加纳大学无障碍建筑环境:一种包容性评估方法

Eric Paul Tudzi, J. Bugri, A. K. Danso
{"title":"加纳大学无障碍建筑环境:一种包容性评估方法","authors":"Eric Paul Tudzi, J. Bugri, A. K. Danso","doi":"10.5463/DCID.V28I1.592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : The study aimed to objectively assess the level of inclusiveness of buildings in selected Universities on the basis of international protocols and local legislation that require that buildings should be made accessible to persons with disabilities. Method : A building inclusiveness model, the Composite Disability Design Inclusiveness Score (CDDIS), was used to assess the levels of inclusiveness of 110 buildings in 6 purposively selected Universities in Ghana, using maximal variation sampling. Results : It was found that the buildings of the sampled Universities were not inclusive to a large extent. With one exception, there were variations in the levels of inclusiveness of the buildings in each institution. Conclusions : Irrespective of international protocols and local legislation, the built environments in Universities are not as accessible as they ought to be. Limitation : The CDDIS is a simple quantitative means of assessing the inclusiveness of buildings and allows for objective comparisons. However, it is expected that for purposes of comparison, identical buildings should be used. Any intended use of the CDDIS will require the use of a checklist that is appropriately designed to meet the peculiarities of the particular study. Implications: There is the need for expedited effort to ensure inclusiveness in University built environments. This will help greatly towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.","PeriodicalId":179630,"journal":{"name":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Accessible Built Environments in Universities in Ghana: An Approach to Inclusiveness Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Eric Paul Tudzi, J. Bugri, A. K. Danso\",\"doi\":\"10.5463/DCID.V28I1.592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose : The study aimed to objectively assess the level of inclusiveness of buildings in selected Universities on the basis of international protocols and local legislation that require that buildings should be made accessible to persons with disabilities. Method : A building inclusiveness model, the Composite Disability Design Inclusiveness Score (CDDIS), was used to assess the levels of inclusiveness of 110 buildings in 6 purposively selected Universities in Ghana, using maximal variation sampling. Results : It was found that the buildings of the sampled Universities were not inclusive to a large extent. With one exception, there were variations in the levels of inclusiveness of the buildings in each institution. Conclusions : Irrespective of international protocols and local legislation, the built environments in Universities are not as accessible as they ought to be. Limitation : The CDDIS is a simple quantitative means of assessing the inclusiveness of buildings and allows for objective comparisons. However, it is expected that for purposes of comparison, identical buildings should be used. Any intended use of the CDDIS will require the use of a checklist that is appropriately designed to meet the peculiarities of the particular study. Implications: There is the need for expedited effort to ensure inclusiveness in University built environments. This will help greatly towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.V28I1.592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.V28I1.592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:本研究旨在根据国际议定书和地方立法的要求,客观评估选定大学建筑物的包容性水平,这些规定要求建筑物应使残疾人无障碍。方法:采用建筑包容性模型,即综合残疾设计包容性评分(CDDIS),采用最大变异抽样方法,对加纳6所大学的110栋建筑的包容性水平进行评估。结果:抽样高校的建筑在很大程度上不具有包容性。除了一个例外,每个机构的建筑物的包容性水平各不相同。结论:无论国际协议和地方立法如何,大学的建筑环境都没有达到应有的无障碍水平。限制:市区发展指标是一种简单的定量方法,用以评估建筑物的包容性,并可进行客观比较。不过,预期为了比较起见,应使用相同的建筑物。CDDIS的任何预期用途都需要使用一份清单,该清单应经过适当设计,以满足特定研究的特点。启示:有必要加快努力,确保大学建筑环境的包容性。这将大大有助于实现可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Accessible Built Environments in Universities in Ghana: An Approach to Inclusiveness Assessment
Purpose : The study aimed to objectively assess the level of inclusiveness of buildings in selected Universities on the basis of international protocols and local legislation that require that buildings should be made accessible to persons with disabilities. Method : A building inclusiveness model, the Composite Disability Design Inclusiveness Score (CDDIS), was used to assess the levels of inclusiveness of 110 buildings in 6 purposively selected Universities in Ghana, using maximal variation sampling. Results : It was found that the buildings of the sampled Universities were not inclusive to a large extent. With one exception, there were variations in the levels of inclusiveness of the buildings in each institution. Conclusions : Irrespective of international protocols and local legislation, the built environments in Universities are not as accessible as they ought to be. Limitation : The CDDIS is a simple quantitative means of assessing the inclusiveness of buildings and allows for objective comparisons. However, it is expected that for purposes of comparison, identical buildings should be used. Any intended use of the CDDIS will require the use of a checklist that is appropriately designed to meet the peculiarities of the particular study. Implications: There is the need for expedited effort to ensure inclusiveness in University built environments. This will help greatly towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信