在实践中对散热器进行排名的一种方法:散热器性能测试仪

C. Lasance, H. Eggink
{"title":"在实践中对散热器进行排名的一种方法:散热器性能测试仪","authors":"C. Lasance, H. Eggink","doi":"10.1109/STHERM.2005.1412170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One way of cooling electronic devices is through enlarging the surface that is in contact with a fluid (usually air) by attaching a heat sink. Since literally thousands of heat sinks are available many designers are confronted with the question: which one? Very often the designer's choice is based on cost and manufacturer's data. Unfortunately, this data cannot be used with confidence because they are almost exclusively based on measurements in a closed duct, thereby disregarding bypass effects and inflow conditions. CFD modeling is no option unless time, a supercomputer and a calibration laboratory are available. This paper discusses a method to rank heat sinks given a certain application. The measurement is based on the extraction of the average heat transfer coefficient from time-dependent temperature curves as a function of velocity and bypass. Scaling the measured effective heat transfer coefficient by mass, volume, weight or height provides several performance metrics allowing designers a novel way of ranking heat sinks in conditions that resemble the application.","PeriodicalId":256936,"journal":{"name":"Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management IEEE Twenty First Annual IEEE Symposium, 2005.","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method to rank heat sinks in practice: the heat sink performance tester\",\"authors\":\"C. Lasance, H. Eggink\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STHERM.2005.1412170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One way of cooling electronic devices is through enlarging the surface that is in contact with a fluid (usually air) by attaching a heat sink. Since literally thousands of heat sinks are available many designers are confronted with the question: which one? Very often the designer's choice is based on cost and manufacturer's data. Unfortunately, this data cannot be used with confidence because they are almost exclusively based on measurements in a closed duct, thereby disregarding bypass effects and inflow conditions. CFD modeling is no option unless time, a supercomputer and a calibration laboratory are available. This paper discusses a method to rank heat sinks given a certain application. The measurement is based on the extraction of the average heat transfer coefficient from time-dependent temperature curves as a function of velocity and bypass. Scaling the measured effective heat transfer coefficient by mass, volume, weight or height provides several performance metrics allowing designers a novel way of ranking heat sinks in conditions that resemble the application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management IEEE Twenty First Annual IEEE Symposium, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"249 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management IEEE Twenty First Annual IEEE Symposium, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STHERM.2005.1412170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management IEEE Twenty First Annual IEEE Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STHERM.2005.1412170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

冷却电子设备的一种方法是通过附加一个散热器来扩大与流体(通常是空气)接触的表面。由于市面上有成千上万的散热片可供选择,许多设计师都面临着这样一个问题:选择哪一种?通常,设计师的选择是基于成本和制造商的数据。不幸的是,这些数据不能可靠地使用,因为它们几乎完全基于封闭管道中的测量,从而忽略了旁路效应和流入条件。除非有时间、超级计算机和校准实验室,否则CFD建模是不可选的。本文讨论了在实际应用中对散热器进行排序的方法。测量是基于从随时间变化的温度曲线中提取平均传热系数作为速度和旁路的函数。按质量,体积,重量或高度缩放测量的有效传热系数提供了几个性能指标,允许设计人员在类似应用的条件下对散热器进行排名的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A method to rank heat sinks in practice: the heat sink performance tester
One way of cooling electronic devices is through enlarging the surface that is in contact with a fluid (usually air) by attaching a heat sink. Since literally thousands of heat sinks are available many designers are confronted with the question: which one? Very often the designer's choice is based on cost and manufacturer's data. Unfortunately, this data cannot be used with confidence because they are almost exclusively based on measurements in a closed duct, thereby disregarding bypass effects and inflow conditions. CFD modeling is no option unless time, a supercomputer and a calibration laboratory are available. This paper discusses a method to rank heat sinks given a certain application. The measurement is based on the extraction of the average heat transfer coefficient from time-dependent temperature curves as a function of velocity and bypass. Scaling the measured effective heat transfer coefficient by mass, volume, weight or height provides several performance metrics allowing designers a novel way of ranking heat sinks in conditions that resemble the application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信