{"title":"普通教育学和特殊教育Űberlegungen关系包容和角度Exklusion Dreiser Kausalitäten在及自满Bildungsprozessen","authors":"D. Benner","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.0280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author considers the relationship between exclusion and inclusion from the perspective of three kinds of causality in educational processes. His considerations are divided into four parts. The first one indicates the place occupied by special education as part of general science of education. The second part explains the difference between education as extrinsic pedagogical interaction and intrinsic self-educative process. On this basis, the third part discusses three types of causes characterizing the processes of teaching and learning and refers them to special education’s field. The fourth and last part contains guidelines for such an understanding of special education, in which the opposition between inclusion and exclusion is avoided.\n\n","PeriodicalId":165431,"journal":{"name":"Men Disability Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allgemeine Pädagogik und Sonderpädagogik. Űberlegungen zum Verhältnis von Inklusion und Exklusion aus der Sicht Dreiser Kausalitäten in Erziehungs- und Bildungsprozessen\",\"authors\":\"D. Benner\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0013.0280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author considers the relationship between exclusion and inclusion from the perspective of three kinds of causality in educational processes. His considerations are divided into four parts. The first one indicates the place occupied by special education as part of general science of education. The second part explains the difference between education as extrinsic pedagogical interaction and intrinsic self-educative process. On this basis, the third part discusses three types of causes characterizing the processes of teaching and learning and refers them to special education’s field. The fourth and last part contains guidelines for such an understanding of special education, in which the opposition between inclusion and exclusion is avoided.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":165431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Men Disability Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Men Disability Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Men Disability Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Allgemeine Pädagogik und Sonderpädagogik. Űberlegungen zum Verhältnis von Inklusion und Exklusion aus der Sicht Dreiser Kausalitäten in Erziehungs- und Bildungsprozessen
The author considers the relationship between exclusion and inclusion from the perspective of three kinds of causality in educational processes. His considerations are divided into four parts. The first one indicates the place occupied by special education as part of general science of education. The second part explains the difference between education as extrinsic pedagogical interaction and intrinsic self-educative process. On this basis, the third part discusses three types of causes characterizing the processes of teaching and learning and refers them to special education’s field. The fourth and last part contains guidelines for such an understanding of special education, in which the opposition between inclusion and exclusion is avoided.