肺部超声与胸部CT对新冠肺炎的诊断价值

Л. В. Шогенова, Сергей Дмитриевич Варфоломеев, В. И. Быков, С. Б. Цыбенова, А. М. Рябоконь, С. В. Журавель, И. И. Уткина, П. В. Гаврилов, С. Петриков, Александр Григорьевич Чучалин, А. А. Панин
{"title":"肺部超声与胸部CT对新冠肺炎的诊断价值","authors":"Л. В. Шогенова, Сергей Дмитриевич Варфоломеев, В. И. Быков, С. Б. Цыбенова, А. М. Рябоконь, С. В. Журавель, И. И. Уткина, П. В. Гаврилов, С. Петриков, Александр Григорьевич Чучалин, А. А. Панин","doi":"10.47093/2218-7332.2020.11.2.5-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lung ultrasound demonstrates a high diagnostic value in the assessment of lung diseases.Aim.To determine the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of lung changes in COVID-19.Materials and methods.The retrospective study included 45 patients (28 men) aged 37 to 90 years who underwent polypositional lung ultrasound with an assessment of 14 zones. The study compared lung echograms with chest CT data in assessing the prevalence of the process and the nature of structural changes. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of lung ultrasound in comparison with CT scans were determined, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results.In 44 patients (98%), CT revealed pathological changes with subpleural localization in both lungs. Of these, in 30 cases, the inflammation was limited only to the subpleural parts, and in 14 cases, the changes spread to the basal parts of the lungs, while ultrasound revealed changes at the depth of the lesion no more than 4 cm. The lesion of 10–11 zones according to lung ultrasound corresponds to CT 1–2 degrees, the lesion of 13–14 zones — CT 3–4 degrees. The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes of various types was ≥ 92%. The highest sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI: 92.8–99.8%) was determined for small consolidations on the background of interstitial changes (degree 1A+, 1B+), which corresponded to “crazy-paving” pattern on CT. The specificity depended on the nature of the changes and varied from 46.7 to 70.0%. Diagnostic accuracy was ≥ 81%, the maximum values of 90.6% (95% CI: 85.6–94.2%) were obtained for moderate interstitial changes (grade 1A) corresponding to ground-glass opacity (type one) according to CT data.Conclusion.The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes in COVID-19 is more than 90%. Lung ultrasound has some limitations: inability to determine the prevalence of the process clearly and identify centrally located areas of changes in the lung tissue.","PeriodicalId":129151,"journal":{"name":"Sechenov Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of lung ultrasound versus chest CT in COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Л. В. Шогенова, Сергей Дмитриевич Варфоломеев, В. И. Быков, С. Б. Цыбенова, А. М. Рябоконь, С. В. Журавель, И. И. Уткина, П. В. Гаврилов, С. Петриков, Александр Григорьевич Чучалин, А. А. Панин\",\"doi\":\"10.47093/2218-7332.2020.11.2.5-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lung ultrasound demonstrates a high diagnostic value in the assessment of lung diseases.Aim.To determine the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of lung changes in COVID-19.Materials and methods.The retrospective study included 45 patients (28 men) aged 37 to 90 years who underwent polypositional lung ultrasound with an assessment of 14 zones. The study compared lung echograms with chest CT data in assessing the prevalence of the process and the nature of structural changes. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of lung ultrasound in comparison with CT scans were determined, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results.In 44 patients (98%), CT revealed pathological changes with subpleural localization in both lungs. Of these, in 30 cases, the inflammation was limited only to the subpleural parts, and in 14 cases, the changes spread to the basal parts of the lungs, while ultrasound revealed changes at the depth of the lesion no more than 4 cm. The lesion of 10–11 zones according to lung ultrasound corresponds to CT 1–2 degrees, the lesion of 13–14 zones — CT 3–4 degrees. The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes of various types was ≥ 92%. The highest sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI: 92.8–99.8%) was determined for small consolidations on the background of interstitial changes (degree 1A+, 1B+), which corresponded to “crazy-paving” pattern on CT. The specificity depended on the nature of the changes and varied from 46.7 to 70.0%. Diagnostic accuracy was ≥ 81%, the maximum values of 90.6% (95% CI: 85.6–94.2%) were obtained for moderate interstitial changes (grade 1A) corresponding to ground-glass opacity (type one) according to CT data.Conclusion.The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes in COVID-19 is more than 90%. Lung ultrasound has some limitations: inability to determine the prevalence of the process clearly and identify centrally located areas of changes in the lung tissue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sechenov Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sechenov Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47093/2218-7332.2020.11.2.5-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sechenov Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47093/2218-7332.2020.11.2.5-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较肺部超声与胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)对COVID-19肺部病变的诊断准确性。材料和方法。回顾性研究包括45例患者(28名男性),年龄在37至90岁之间,他们接受了肺多位置超声检查,评估了14个区。该研究将肺部超声图与胸部CT数据进行比较,以评估结构改变的过程和性质的患病率。结果:44例(98%)患者的CT表现为双肺胸膜下定位病变。其中,30例炎症仅局限于胸膜下部位,14例病变扩散至肺基底部,而超声显示病变深度不超过4厘米。肺超声示10-11区病变对应CT 1-2度,13-14区病变对应CT 3-4度。超声对各类肺部病变的检测灵敏度≥92%。对间质改变背景下的小实变(1A+, 1B+度)的灵敏度最高,为97.9% (95% CI: 92.8-99.8%),对应于CT上的“疯狂铺路”模式。特异性取决于病变的性质,从46.7%到70.0%不等。CT资料显示,与磨玻璃混浊(1型)相对应的中度间质改变(1A级)的诊断准确率最高为90.6% (95% CI: 856 - 94.2%)。结论超声对COVID-19肺部病变的检测灵敏度大于90%。肺部超声有一些局限性:不能清楚地确定该过程的患病率,也不能识别肺组织中位于中心的变化区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of lung ultrasound versus chest CT in COVID-19
Lung ultrasound demonstrates a high diagnostic value in the assessment of lung diseases.Aim.To determine the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of lung changes in COVID-19.Materials and methods.The retrospective study included 45 patients (28 men) aged 37 to 90 years who underwent polypositional lung ultrasound with an assessment of 14 zones. The study compared lung echograms with chest CT data in assessing the prevalence of the process and the nature of structural changes. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of lung ultrasound in comparison with CT scans were determined, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results.In 44 patients (98%), CT revealed pathological changes with subpleural localization in both lungs. Of these, in 30 cases, the inflammation was limited only to the subpleural parts, and in 14 cases, the changes spread to the basal parts of the lungs, while ultrasound revealed changes at the depth of the lesion no more than 4 cm. The lesion of 10–11 zones according to lung ultrasound corresponds to CT 1–2 degrees, the lesion of 13–14 zones — CT 3–4 degrees. The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes of various types was ≥ 92%. The highest sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI: 92.8–99.8%) was determined for small consolidations on the background of interstitial changes (degree 1A+, 1B+), which corresponded to “crazy-paving” pattern on CT. The specificity depended on the nature of the changes and varied from 46.7 to 70.0%. Diagnostic accuracy was ≥ 81%, the maximum values of 90.6% (95% CI: 85.6–94.2%) were obtained for moderate interstitial changes (grade 1A) corresponding to ground-glass opacity (type one) according to CT data.Conclusion.The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes in COVID-19 is more than 90%. Lung ultrasound has some limitations: inability to determine the prevalence of the process clearly and identify centrally located areas of changes in the lung tissue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信