Ákos Kozák, Budapesti Gazdasági Egyetem
{"title":"A fogyasztói kutatások története","authors":"Ákos Kozák, Budapesti Gazdasági Egyetem","doi":"10.15170/mm.2019.53.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE AIMS OF THE PAPER \nThe objective of the study is to offer an overview of the last fifty years of the history of Hungarian and international consumer research taking the thematic and methodological aspects into consideration. Since consumer culture is basically the territory of sociologists and cultural anthropologists, the study mostly concerns the primary function and semantic field of consumption. Similarly, it does not discuss lifestyle research and the models of the sociology of consumption. The study essentially assesses the topics under the headings marketing and discipline, discussing both academic and business related consumer researches. \nMETHODOLOGY \nAs regards the methodology applied, it was mostly the research of the existing special literature that could come into question since the topic certainly does not lend itself to primary field work. At the same time, in the course of the study of the secondary data sources, several subjects using accurate content analysis and statistical methods emerged. The study intended to explore both international and Hungarian special literature, but in effect was limited to presenting the Anglo-Saxon practice due to the fact that relevant data sources were available in the English language. \nMOST IMORTANT RESULTS \nOne of the most significant findings related to consumption research is that the loss of focus experienced in related social sciences, especially in sociology, is seen here to a lesser extent. On the other hand, the discrepancies between the business (corporate) and academic/university researches can be considered general. A further methodological dilemma of significance is whether consumer research should move towards interdisciplinarity, or should is remain a multidisciplinary topic build on the knowledge base of related social sciences? A further important finding arising from the study of the special literature is that the shift of emphasis towards buyer research in consumer research can be captured in both scientific special literature and business practice. \nPROPOSALS CONCERNING PRACTICE/ECONOMIC POLICY \nIn order to canonize the sociology of consumption, it is necessary that consumer research be positioned in its3 proper place. The dilemma whether it belongs in economy, sociology and/or anthropology is worth clarifying because then the focus becomes stronger and clearer on consumer research.","PeriodicalId":431268,"journal":{"name":"Marketing & Menedzsment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing & Menedzsment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/mm.2019.53.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

论文的目的该研究的目的是提供匈牙利和国际消费者研究的过去五十年的历史概述,考虑到主题和方法方面。由于消费文化基本上是社会学家和文化人类学家的研究领域,因此消费文化的研究主要集中在消费的初级功能和语义场域。同样,它也没有讨论生活方式研究和消费社会学的模型。该研究基本上评估标题下的主题营销和纪律,讨论学术和商业相关的消费者研究。至于所采用的方法,它主要是对现有的特殊文献的研究,这可能会受到质疑,因为这个主题肯定不适合主要的实地工作。同时,在对二级数据源的研究过程中,出现了几个采用准确内容分析和统计方法的课题。这项研究旨在探讨国际和匈牙利的特殊文献,但实际上仅限于介绍盎格鲁-撒克逊人的做法,因为有英文的相关数据来源。最重要的结果与消费研究相关的最重要的发现之一是,在相关的社会科学中,特别是在社会学中,注意力的丧失在较小程度上是可见的。另一方面,商业(公司)和学术/大学研究之间的差异可以被认为是普遍的。另一个重要的方法论困境是,消费者研究是应该走向跨学科,还是应该保持一个建立在相关社会科学知识基础上的多学科主题?从专业文献研究中产生的另一个重要发现是,消费者研究的重点向买家研究的转变可以在科学专业文献和商业实践中得到体现。为了规范消费社会学,有必要将消费者研究定位在适当的位置上。它是否属于经济学、社会学和/或人类学的困境值得澄清,因为这样消费者研究的重点就会变得更强、更清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A fogyasztói kutatások története
THE AIMS OF THE PAPER The objective of the study is to offer an overview of the last fifty years of the history of Hungarian and international consumer research taking the thematic and methodological aspects into consideration. Since consumer culture is basically the territory of sociologists and cultural anthropologists, the study mostly concerns the primary function and semantic field of consumption. Similarly, it does not discuss lifestyle research and the models of the sociology of consumption. The study essentially assesses the topics under the headings marketing and discipline, discussing both academic and business related consumer researches. METHODOLOGY As regards the methodology applied, it was mostly the research of the existing special literature that could come into question since the topic certainly does not lend itself to primary field work. At the same time, in the course of the study of the secondary data sources, several subjects using accurate content analysis and statistical methods emerged. The study intended to explore both international and Hungarian special literature, but in effect was limited to presenting the Anglo-Saxon practice due to the fact that relevant data sources were available in the English language. MOST IMORTANT RESULTS One of the most significant findings related to consumption research is that the loss of focus experienced in related social sciences, especially in sociology, is seen here to a lesser extent. On the other hand, the discrepancies between the business (corporate) and academic/university researches can be considered general. A further methodological dilemma of significance is whether consumer research should move towards interdisciplinarity, or should is remain a multidisciplinary topic build on the knowledge base of related social sciences? A further important finding arising from the study of the special literature is that the shift of emphasis towards buyer research in consumer research can be captured in both scientific special literature and business practice. PROPOSALS CONCERNING PRACTICE/ECONOMIC POLICY In order to canonize the sociology of consumption, it is necessary that consumer research be positioned in its3 proper place. The dilemma whether it belongs in economy, sociology and/or anthropology is worth clarifying because then the focus becomes stronger and clearer on consumer research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信