信仰与信赖:荣誉与尊严二元对立的神话基础

C. Herrman
{"title":"信仰与信赖:荣誉与尊严二元对立的神话基础","authors":"C. Herrman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2748337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A structuralist definition might well treat of religion in this way: A system of myth incorporating explanations of reality that grounds normative metaphysical outlooks as well as affirming conduct in conformity with social integrity, and which is maintained as authoritative both because of and by means of sacrality. This paper argues that myth directs the social weltanschauung with a stress variously upon honor and dignity. These two terms thus form a parent analytical binary supporting subsidiary cognate pairs termed ‘dimensions’ that describe the means by which social institutions apply mythic content toward (on behalf of) honor or dignity. It argues further that certain social structures express mythic-derived norms from biosocial substrates manifesting via drift potentials that in turn express as dimensional sub-traits of honor or dignity. This is what we refer to as a ‘belief-reliance system’. Belief in myth generates reliance in/upon the institutions translating myth into norms. A sufficient understanding of these elements should enable a vastly improved understanding of local and international culture. The paper is divided between an explanation of core concepts (Foundation) and the conclusions (Analysands), which include applications of the concepts in the description of culture, as well as the use of the concepts to engage cultures in conflict resolution.","PeriodicalId":189708,"journal":{"name":"Metaphysics eJournal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belief & Reliance: Mythic Ground for an Honor-Dignity Binary\",\"authors\":\"C. Herrman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2748337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A structuralist definition might well treat of religion in this way: A system of myth incorporating explanations of reality that grounds normative metaphysical outlooks as well as affirming conduct in conformity with social integrity, and which is maintained as authoritative both because of and by means of sacrality. This paper argues that myth directs the social weltanschauung with a stress variously upon honor and dignity. These two terms thus form a parent analytical binary supporting subsidiary cognate pairs termed ‘dimensions’ that describe the means by which social institutions apply mythic content toward (on behalf of) honor or dignity. It argues further that certain social structures express mythic-derived norms from biosocial substrates manifesting via drift potentials that in turn express as dimensional sub-traits of honor or dignity. This is what we refer to as a ‘belief-reliance system’. Belief in myth generates reliance in/upon the institutions translating myth into norms. A sufficient understanding of these elements should enable a vastly improved understanding of local and international culture. The paper is divided between an explanation of core concepts (Foundation) and the conclusions (Analysands), which include applications of the concepts in the description of culture, as well as the use of the concepts to engage cultures in conflict resolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metaphysics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metaphysics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2748337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metaphysics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2748337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一个结构主义的定义可以很好地以这种方式对待宗教:一个神话体系,包含了对现实的解释,以规范的形而上学观点为基础,并肯定了符合社会完整性的行为,并且由于神圣性和通过神圣性而保持权威。本文认为,神话以对荣誉和尊严的不同强调引导着社会生活。因此,这两个术语形成了一个父分析二元,支持被称为“维度”的附属同源对,描述了社会机构将神话内容应用于(代表)荣誉或尊严的手段。它进一步认为,某些社会结构表达了来自生物社会基础的神话衍生规范,并通过漂移潜力表现出来,进而表达为荣誉或尊严的维度子特征。这就是我们所说的“信念-依赖系统”。对神话的信仰产生了对将神话转化为规范的制度的依赖。充分了解这些因素,就能大大提高对当地和国际文化的了解。本文分为对核心概念的解释(基础)和结论(分析),其中包括概念在文化描述中的应用,以及概念在解决冲突中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Belief & Reliance: Mythic Ground for an Honor-Dignity Binary
A structuralist definition might well treat of religion in this way: A system of myth incorporating explanations of reality that grounds normative metaphysical outlooks as well as affirming conduct in conformity with social integrity, and which is maintained as authoritative both because of and by means of sacrality. This paper argues that myth directs the social weltanschauung with a stress variously upon honor and dignity. These two terms thus form a parent analytical binary supporting subsidiary cognate pairs termed ‘dimensions’ that describe the means by which social institutions apply mythic content toward (on behalf of) honor or dignity. It argues further that certain social structures express mythic-derived norms from biosocial substrates manifesting via drift potentials that in turn express as dimensional sub-traits of honor or dignity. This is what we refer to as a ‘belief-reliance system’. Belief in myth generates reliance in/upon the institutions translating myth into norms. A sufficient understanding of these elements should enable a vastly improved understanding of local and international culture. The paper is divided between an explanation of core concepts (Foundation) and the conclusions (Analysands), which include applications of the concepts in the description of culture, as well as the use of the concepts to engage cultures in conflict resolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信