光子元件技术的鉴定和可靠性标准

A. Bensoussan
{"title":"光子元件技术的鉴定和可靠性标准","authors":"A. Bensoussan","doi":"10.1109/MEPHOCO.2014.6866465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From optoelectronics commercial systems through aerospace applications, new technologies based equipment must be designed taking into account reliability risks. Existing qualification standards and processes have been developed from field return “lessons learned”. The qualification methods have been built-up to take into account questions and concerns observed on previous well established processes. Is this approach applicable to new products and materials? How will new optoelectronic technologies, nanotechnologies, and new packaging techniques perform when tested under conditions defined in existing standards? Are the Aerospace and Military standards adequate to validate long term application and proof of reliability for the new devices? What is missing, and what is needed? Should we modify the methodology for qualifying new parts based on these innovative technologies? What is needed for implementing efficiently and just in time High Reliability application processes? Evolving methodology may be one solution but must be constructed based on results of experiments from FOAT (Failure Oriented Accelerated Testing) and QT (Qualification Testing) for new technologies. This presentation gives an overview of general issues of microelectronics when employed in harsh environments (electrical, optical, thermal, mechanical, radiation). Understanding the need, defining goals, accumulating field failure data, developing reliability models and educating our customers is a recommended approach to develop comprehensive FOAT and QT programs.","PeriodicalId":219746,"journal":{"name":"2014 Third Mediterranean Photonics Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualification and reliability standards for photonic component technologies\",\"authors\":\"A. Bensoussan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MEPHOCO.2014.6866465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From optoelectronics commercial systems through aerospace applications, new technologies based equipment must be designed taking into account reliability risks. Existing qualification standards and processes have been developed from field return “lessons learned”. The qualification methods have been built-up to take into account questions and concerns observed on previous well established processes. Is this approach applicable to new products and materials? How will new optoelectronic technologies, nanotechnologies, and new packaging techniques perform when tested under conditions defined in existing standards? Are the Aerospace and Military standards adequate to validate long term application and proof of reliability for the new devices? What is missing, and what is needed? Should we modify the methodology for qualifying new parts based on these innovative technologies? What is needed for implementing efficiently and just in time High Reliability application processes? Evolving methodology may be one solution but must be constructed based on results of experiments from FOAT (Failure Oriented Accelerated Testing) and QT (Qualification Testing) for new technologies. This presentation gives an overview of general issues of microelectronics when employed in harsh environments (electrical, optical, thermal, mechanical, radiation). Understanding the need, defining goals, accumulating field failure data, developing reliability models and educating our customers is a recommended approach to develop comprehensive FOAT and QT programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Third Mediterranean Photonics Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Third Mediterranean Photonics Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPHOCO.2014.6866465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Third Mediterranean Photonics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPHOCO.2014.6866465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从光电商业系统到航空航天应用,基于新技术的设备必须在设计时考虑可靠性风险。现有的资格标准和程序是根据实地返回的“经验教训”制定的。鉴定方法的建立是为了考虑到在以前建立良好的过程中观察到的问题和关注。这种方法是否适用于新产品和新材料?在现有标准规定的条件下进行测试时,新的光电技术、纳米技术和新的封装技术将如何表现?航空航天和军事标准是否足以验证新设备的长期应用和可靠性证明?缺少什么,又需要什么?我们是否应该修改基于这些创新技术的新零件鉴定方法?为了高效且及时地实现高可靠性应用程序流程,需要什么?不断发展的方法论可能是一种解决方案,但必须基于FOAT(面向失败的加速测试)和QT(资格测试)对新技术的实验结果来构建。本报告概述了在恶劣环境(电、光、热、机械、辐射)中使用的微电子技术的一般问题。了解需求,确定目标,积累现场故障数据,开发可靠性模型和教育我们的客户是开发全面的FOAT和QT程序的推荐方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualification and reliability standards for photonic component technologies
From optoelectronics commercial systems through aerospace applications, new technologies based equipment must be designed taking into account reliability risks. Existing qualification standards and processes have been developed from field return “lessons learned”. The qualification methods have been built-up to take into account questions and concerns observed on previous well established processes. Is this approach applicable to new products and materials? How will new optoelectronic technologies, nanotechnologies, and new packaging techniques perform when tested under conditions defined in existing standards? Are the Aerospace and Military standards adequate to validate long term application and proof of reliability for the new devices? What is missing, and what is needed? Should we modify the methodology for qualifying new parts based on these innovative technologies? What is needed for implementing efficiently and just in time High Reliability application processes? Evolving methodology may be one solution but must be constructed based on results of experiments from FOAT (Failure Oriented Accelerated Testing) and QT (Qualification Testing) for new technologies. This presentation gives an overview of general issues of microelectronics when employed in harsh environments (electrical, optical, thermal, mechanical, radiation). Understanding the need, defining goals, accumulating field failure data, developing reliability models and educating our customers is a recommended approach to develop comprehensive FOAT and QT programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信