繁荣社会中的危机:不可避免吗?

Y. Kirsh
{"title":"繁荣社会中的危机:不可避免吗?","authors":"Y. Kirsh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3632403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crises are integral part of economic history. Analysis of economic crises, from the tulip mania in the 17th century to the 2008 crisis, reveals that in prosperous societies most of the crises are associated not with a shortage of resources but rather with abundance. These crises are instigated by processes inherent to the free market, which allows phenomena such as hazardous investments, reckless bank lending policies and the formation of speculative bubbles. The 2008 crisis, for example, involved irresponsible behavior of major financial institutions as well as failure of the regulators to prevent this behavior by confronting the institutions they were entrusted to oversee. The debate between fiscalists and monetarists is less relevant today, while the cooperation between the government, the central bank, and the financial sector becomes a key factor. In countries where this cooperation was successful, the 2008 crisis was less harmful. E.g., in Australia, where the banks had accumulated fewer bad debts than in other countries and the government and the Reserve Bank were quick to act, the crisis was hardly noticed. Another class of economic crises are those triggered by an external cause, such as a natural disaster or an epidemic. In the COVID-19 event, where handling the crisis demanded a combination of health and economic measures, the importance of the private sectors was proven as well. For example, in South Korea, where the government acted quickly and private companies were summoned to participate in developing tests for the virus, the epidemic was blocked earlier and with fewer deaths than in other countries. <br><br>","PeriodicalId":105736,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crises in Prosperous Societies: Are they Inevitable?\",\"authors\":\"Y. Kirsh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3632403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crises are integral part of economic history. Analysis of economic crises, from the tulip mania in the 17th century to the 2008 crisis, reveals that in prosperous societies most of the crises are associated not with a shortage of resources but rather with abundance. These crises are instigated by processes inherent to the free market, which allows phenomena such as hazardous investments, reckless bank lending policies and the formation of speculative bubbles. The 2008 crisis, for example, involved irresponsible behavior of major financial institutions as well as failure of the regulators to prevent this behavior by confronting the institutions they were entrusted to oversee. The debate between fiscalists and monetarists is less relevant today, while the cooperation between the government, the central bank, and the financial sector becomes a key factor. In countries where this cooperation was successful, the 2008 crisis was less harmful. E.g., in Australia, where the banks had accumulated fewer bad debts than in other countries and the government and the Reserve Bank were quick to act, the crisis was hardly noticed. Another class of economic crises are those triggered by an external cause, such as a natural disaster or an epidemic. In the COVID-19 event, where handling the crisis demanded a combination of health and economic measures, the importance of the private sectors was proven as well. For example, in South Korea, where the government acted quickly and private companies were summoned to participate in developing tests for the virus, the epidemic was blocked earlier and with fewer deaths than in other countries. <br><br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":105736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3632403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3632403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

危机是经济史上不可分割的一部分。对经济危机(从17世纪的郁金香狂热到2008年的危机)的分析表明,在繁荣的社会中,大多数危机与资源短缺无关,而是与资源丰富有关。这些危机是由自由市场固有的过程引发的,这种过程允许出现危险投资、鲁莽的银行贷款政策和形成投机泡沫等现象。例如,2008年的危机涉及主要金融机构不负责任的行为,以及监管机构未能通过对抗他们受托监管的机构来防止这种行为。财政主义者和货币主义者之间的争论在今天已经不那么重要了,而政府、央行和金融部门之间的合作成为了一个关键因素。在这种合作取得成功的国家,2008年危机的危害较小。例如,在澳大利亚,银行积累的坏账比其他国家少,政府和储备银行迅速采取行动,危机几乎没有被注意到。另一类经济危机是由外部原因引发的,如自然灾害或流行病。在应对新冠肺炎危机时,需要结合卫生和经济措施,这也证明了私营部门的重要性。例如,在韩国,政府迅速采取行动,并召集私营公司参与开发该病毒的检测方法,因此疫情得到了更早的遏制,死亡人数也比其他国家少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crises in Prosperous Societies: Are they Inevitable?
Crises are integral part of economic history. Analysis of economic crises, from the tulip mania in the 17th century to the 2008 crisis, reveals that in prosperous societies most of the crises are associated not with a shortage of resources but rather with abundance. These crises are instigated by processes inherent to the free market, which allows phenomena such as hazardous investments, reckless bank lending policies and the formation of speculative bubbles. The 2008 crisis, for example, involved irresponsible behavior of major financial institutions as well as failure of the regulators to prevent this behavior by confronting the institutions they were entrusted to oversee. The debate between fiscalists and monetarists is less relevant today, while the cooperation between the government, the central bank, and the financial sector becomes a key factor. In countries where this cooperation was successful, the 2008 crisis was less harmful. E.g., in Australia, where the banks had accumulated fewer bad debts than in other countries and the government and the Reserve Bank were quick to act, the crisis was hardly noticed. Another class of economic crises are those triggered by an external cause, such as a natural disaster or an epidemic. In the COVID-19 event, where handling the crisis demanded a combination of health and economic measures, the importance of the private sectors was proven as well. For example, in South Korea, where the government acted quickly and private companies were summoned to participate in developing tests for the virus, the epidemic was blocked earlier and with fewer deaths than in other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信