国际电气安全准则的概率比较与应用

W. Carman
{"title":"国际电气安全准则的概率比较与应用","authors":"W. Carman","doi":"10.1109/ICPST.2000.898165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigations have been made into the impact of probabilistic aspects of the shock scenario, yet are rarely applied in practice. To provide reliable design criteria it is necessary to link the electrical shock safety criteria with acceptable risk levels applicable for people, in the context of an electrical power system under earth fault conditions. The paper addresses the basis of the various criteria and identifies inconsistencies that have been introduced when transferring laboratory data to published body current criteria. Interference theory and Monte Carlo simulation techniques are used to statistically appraise the actual level of safety afforded by various safety criteria when compared with the benchmark body current criteria. Directions for rationalisation or change are identified to ensure consistency with physiological criteria and to ensure that appropriate economic, as well as defensible levels of safety are applied to power system installations.","PeriodicalId":330989,"journal":{"name":"PowerCon 2000. 2000 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX409)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic comparison and application of international electrical safety criteria\",\"authors\":\"W. Carman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPST.2000.898165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investigations have been made into the impact of probabilistic aspects of the shock scenario, yet are rarely applied in practice. To provide reliable design criteria it is necessary to link the electrical shock safety criteria with acceptable risk levels applicable for people, in the context of an electrical power system under earth fault conditions. The paper addresses the basis of the various criteria and identifies inconsistencies that have been introduced when transferring laboratory data to published body current criteria. Interference theory and Monte Carlo simulation techniques are used to statistically appraise the actual level of safety afforded by various safety criteria when compared with the benchmark body current criteria. Directions for rationalisation or change are identified to ensure consistency with physiological criteria and to ensure that appropriate economic, as well as defensible levels of safety are applied to power system installations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PowerCon 2000. 2000 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX409)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PowerCon 2000. 2000 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX409)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPST.2000.898165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PowerCon 2000. 2000 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX409)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPST.2000.898165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

已经对冲击情景的概率方面的影响进行了调查,但很少在实践中应用。为了提供可靠的设计标准,有必要在接地故障条件下的电力系统中,将电击安全标准与适用于人的可接受风险水平联系起来。本文阐述了各种标准的基础,并确定了在将实验室数据转移到已发布的现行机构标准时引入的不一致之处。利用干扰理论和蒙特卡罗模拟技术,对各种安全准则所提供的实际安全水平进行了统计评价,并与基准体电流准则进行了比较。确定合理化或改变的方向,以确保符合生理标准,并确保适当的经济和可防御的安全水平适用于电力系统装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic comparison and application of international electrical safety criteria
Investigations have been made into the impact of probabilistic aspects of the shock scenario, yet are rarely applied in practice. To provide reliable design criteria it is necessary to link the electrical shock safety criteria with acceptable risk levels applicable for people, in the context of an electrical power system under earth fault conditions. The paper addresses the basis of the various criteria and identifies inconsistencies that have been introduced when transferring laboratory data to published body current criteria. Interference theory and Monte Carlo simulation techniques are used to statistically appraise the actual level of safety afforded by various safety criteria when compared with the benchmark body current criteria. Directions for rationalisation or change are identified to ensure consistency with physiological criteria and to ensure that appropriate economic, as well as defensible levels of safety are applied to power system installations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信