手法与针刺治疗膝关节骨性关节炎临床疗效的比较研究

Zhang Da-f
{"title":"手法与针刺治疗膝关节骨性关节炎临床疗效的比较研究","authors":"Zhang Da-f","doi":"10.25236/fmsr.2023.050608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of manipulation and acupuncture therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, and to provide reference for the optimization of the non-drug treatment scheme of the disease. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with knee osteoarthritis were selected and randomly divided into acupuncture group and manipulation group, with 60 cases in each group. The acupuncture group was treated by acupuncture therapy, and the manipulation group was treated by manipulation. WOMAC scale was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups before treatment, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment. Results After 2 weeks' treatment, in the acupuncture group, the pain score was(71.52±36.81), the stiff score was(32.94±31.06), and the joint function score was(286.33±208.92). In the manipulation group, the pain score was(83.39±42.73), the stiff score was(21.17±36.54), and the joint function score was(292.46±213.48). The pain score and joint function score of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P0.05). The difference of the stiff score in the acupuncture group before and after treatment was not statistically significant(P0.05). The stiff score of the manipulation group was significantly lower than that before treatment(P0.05). Two weeks after treatment, the pain score and joint function score showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), but the stiff score of the manipulation group was significantly lower than the acupuncture group(P0.05). Four weeks after treatment, the pain score, stiff score, the joint function score were(43.86 ± 35.31),(13.69 ± 12.32),(179.41 ± 165.18) in the acupuncture group, and(51.79±42.68),(11.52±10.74),(195.39±158.92) in the manipulation group, respectively, which were significantly less than the scores 2 weeks after treatment(P0.05). But the differences between the two groups 4 weeks after treatment were not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with the therapy of acupuncture, manipulation treatment for joint stiffness results in faster onset. Two kinds of therapies are all effective for patients with knee osteoarthritis, which are ideal non-drug therapies for the disease.","PeriodicalId":129141,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Science Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of the Clinical Efficacy of Manipulation and Acupuncture in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"Zhang Da-f\",\"doi\":\"10.25236/fmsr.2023.050608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of manipulation and acupuncture therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, and to provide reference for the optimization of the non-drug treatment scheme of the disease. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with knee osteoarthritis were selected and randomly divided into acupuncture group and manipulation group, with 60 cases in each group. The acupuncture group was treated by acupuncture therapy, and the manipulation group was treated by manipulation. WOMAC scale was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups before treatment, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment. Results After 2 weeks' treatment, in the acupuncture group, the pain score was(71.52±36.81), the stiff score was(32.94±31.06), and the joint function score was(286.33±208.92). In the manipulation group, the pain score was(83.39±42.73), the stiff score was(21.17±36.54), and the joint function score was(292.46±213.48). The pain score and joint function score of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P0.05). The difference of the stiff score in the acupuncture group before and after treatment was not statistically significant(P0.05). The stiff score of the manipulation group was significantly lower than that before treatment(P0.05). Two weeks after treatment, the pain score and joint function score showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), but the stiff score of the manipulation group was significantly lower than the acupuncture group(P0.05). Four weeks after treatment, the pain score, stiff score, the joint function score were(43.86 ± 35.31),(13.69 ± 12.32),(179.41 ± 165.18) in the acupuncture group, and(51.79±42.68),(11.52±10.74),(195.39±158.92) in the manipulation group, respectively, which were significantly less than the scores 2 weeks after treatment(P0.05). But the differences between the two groups 4 weeks after treatment were not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with the therapy of acupuncture, manipulation treatment for joint stiffness results in faster onset. Two kinds of therapies are all effective for patients with knee osteoarthritis, which are ideal non-drug therapies for the disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medical Science Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medical Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25236/fmsr.2023.050608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25236/fmsr.2023.050608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较手法与针刺治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效,为优化该疾病的非药物治疗方案提供参考。方法选取120例膝关节骨性关节炎患者,随机分为针刺组和手法组,每组60例。针刺组采用针刺疗法治疗,手法组采用手法治疗。采用WOMAC量表评价两组患者治疗前、治疗后2周、治疗后4周的临床疗效。结果治疗2周后,针刺组疼痛评分为(71.52±36.81)分,僵硬评分为(32.94±31.06)分,关节功能评分为(286.33±208.92)分。手法组疼痛评分为(83.39±42.73)分,僵硬评分为(21.17±36.54)分,关节功能评分为(292.46±213.48)分。两组患者疼痛评分、关节功能评分均显著低于治疗前(P0.05)。针刺组治疗前后僵硬评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。手法组僵硬评分明显低于治疗前(P0.05)。治疗2周后,两组患者疼痛评分、关节功能评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05),手法组僵硬评分明显低于针刺组(P0.05)。治疗后4周,针刺组疼痛评分、僵硬评分、关节功能评分分别为(43.86±35.31)分、(13.69±12.32)分、(179.41±165.18)分,手法组分别为(51.79±42.68)分、(11.52±10.74)分、(195.39±158.92)分,均显著低于治疗后2周(P0.05)。治疗4周后两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论手法治疗关节僵硬较针刺治疗起效快。两种治疗方法对膝关节骨性关节炎患者均有效,是理想的非药物治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of the Clinical Efficacy of Manipulation and Acupuncture in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of manipulation and acupuncture therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, and to provide reference for the optimization of the non-drug treatment scheme of the disease. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with knee osteoarthritis were selected and randomly divided into acupuncture group and manipulation group, with 60 cases in each group. The acupuncture group was treated by acupuncture therapy, and the manipulation group was treated by manipulation. WOMAC scale was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the two groups before treatment, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment. Results After 2 weeks' treatment, in the acupuncture group, the pain score was(71.52±36.81), the stiff score was(32.94±31.06), and the joint function score was(286.33±208.92). In the manipulation group, the pain score was(83.39±42.73), the stiff score was(21.17±36.54), and the joint function score was(292.46±213.48). The pain score and joint function score of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P0.05). The difference of the stiff score in the acupuncture group before and after treatment was not statistically significant(P0.05). The stiff score of the manipulation group was significantly lower than that before treatment(P0.05). Two weeks after treatment, the pain score and joint function score showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), but the stiff score of the manipulation group was significantly lower than the acupuncture group(P0.05). Four weeks after treatment, the pain score, stiff score, the joint function score were(43.86 ± 35.31),(13.69 ± 12.32),(179.41 ± 165.18) in the acupuncture group, and(51.79±42.68),(11.52±10.74),(195.39±158.92) in the manipulation group, respectively, which were significantly less than the scores 2 weeks after treatment(P0.05). But the differences between the two groups 4 weeks after treatment were not statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with the therapy of acupuncture, manipulation treatment for joint stiffness results in faster onset. Two kinds of therapies are all effective for patients with knee osteoarthritis, which are ideal non-drug therapies for the disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信