剖析教师的分析用法:告知教学的两种不同概况

Qiujie Li, Yeonji Jung, Bernice d'Anjou, A. Wise
{"title":"剖析教师的分析用法:告知教学的两种不同概况","authors":"Qiujie Li, Yeonji Jung, Bernice d'Anjou, A. Wise","doi":"10.1145/3506860.3506905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses the gap in knowledge about differences in how instructors use analytics to inform teaching by examining the ways that thirteen college instructors engaged with a set of university-provided analytics. Using multiple walk-through interviews with the instructors and qualitative inductive coding, two profiles of instructor analytics use were identified that were distinct from each other in terms of the goals of analytics use, how instructors made sense of and took actions upon the analytics, and the ways that ethical concerns were conceived. Specifically, one group of instructors used analytics to help students get aligned to and engaged in the course, whereas the other group used analytics to align the course to meet students’ needs. Instructors in both profiles saw ethical questions as central to their learning analytics use, with instructors in one profile focusing on transparency and the other on student privacy and agency. These findings suggest the need to view analytics use as an integrated component of instructor teaching practices and envision complementary sets of technical and pedagogical support that can best facilitate the distinct activities aligned with each profile.","PeriodicalId":185465,"journal":{"name":"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking Instructors’ Analytics Use: Two Distinct Profiles for Informing Teaching\",\"authors\":\"Qiujie Li, Yeonji Jung, Bernice d'Anjou, A. Wise\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3506860.3506905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study addresses the gap in knowledge about differences in how instructors use analytics to inform teaching by examining the ways that thirteen college instructors engaged with a set of university-provided analytics. Using multiple walk-through interviews with the instructors and qualitative inductive coding, two profiles of instructor analytics use were identified that were distinct from each other in terms of the goals of analytics use, how instructors made sense of and took actions upon the analytics, and the ways that ethical concerns were conceived. Specifically, one group of instructors used analytics to help students get aligned to and engaged in the course, whereas the other group used analytics to align the course to meet students’ needs. Instructors in both profiles saw ethical questions as central to their learning analytics use, with instructors in one profile focusing on transparency and the other on student privacy and agency. These findings suggest the need to view analytics use as an integrated component of instructor teaching practices and envision complementary sets of technical and pedagogical support that can best facilitate the distinct activities aligned with each profile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究通过考察13位大学教师使用一套大学提供的分析方法的方式,解决了关于教师如何使用分析来为教学提供信息的差异的知识差距。通过对教师的多次访谈和定性归纳编码,我们确定了教师分析使用的两种概况,这两种概况在分析使用的目标、教师如何理解分析并对分析采取行动以及伦理问题的构思方式方面彼此不同。具体来说,一组教师使用分析来帮助学生与课程保持一致并投入其中,而另一组使用分析来调整课程以满足学生的需求。两种情况下的教师都认为道德问题是他们学习分析使用的核心,一种情况下的教师关注透明度,另一种情况下的教师关注学生的隐私和代理。这些发现表明,有必要将分析的使用视为教师教学实践的一个综合组成部分,并设想互补的技术和教学支持,以最好地促进与每个概况相一致的独特活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unpacking Instructors’ Analytics Use: Two Distinct Profiles for Informing Teaching
This study addresses the gap in knowledge about differences in how instructors use analytics to inform teaching by examining the ways that thirteen college instructors engaged with a set of university-provided analytics. Using multiple walk-through interviews with the instructors and qualitative inductive coding, two profiles of instructor analytics use were identified that were distinct from each other in terms of the goals of analytics use, how instructors made sense of and took actions upon the analytics, and the ways that ethical concerns were conceived. Specifically, one group of instructors used analytics to help students get aligned to and engaged in the course, whereas the other group used analytics to align the course to meet students’ needs. Instructors in both profiles saw ethical questions as central to their learning analytics use, with instructors in one profile focusing on transparency and the other on student privacy and agency. These findings suggest the need to view analytics use as an integrated component of instructor teaching practices and envision complementary sets of technical and pedagogical support that can best facilitate the distinct activities aligned with each profile.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信