分析议会辩论的方法

Max Goplerud
{"title":"分析议会辩论的方法","authors":"Max Goplerud","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849063.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides an overview of popular and recent methods for analyzing the text of legislative debates. It splits commonly used methods into three types: methods that analyze the volume of activity by members, ones that create measures of latent concepts, and ones that analyze the content of speeches. After providing an overview of popular methods as well as guidance to applied researchers, each section concludes by discussing a handful of recent papers that provide some important methodological innovations that may be useful in other domains. It concludes by discussing the small-but-growing literature on making causal inferences when using text.","PeriodicalId":217414,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Legislative Debates","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for Analyzing Parliamentary Debates\",\"authors\":\"Max Goplerud\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198849063.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter provides an overview of popular and recent methods for analyzing the text of legislative debates. It splits commonly used methods into three types: methods that analyze the volume of activity by members, ones that create measures of latent concepts, and ones that analyze the content of speeches. After providing an overview of popular methods as well as guidance to applied researchers, each section concludes by discussing a handful of recent papers that provide some important methodological innovations that may be useful in other domains. It concludes by discussing the small-but-growing literature on making causal inferences when using text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Politics of Legislative Debates\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Politics of Legislative Debates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849063.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Legislative Debates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849063.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章概述了分析立法辩论文本的流行和最新方法。它将常用的方法分为三种:分析成员活动量的方法、创造潜在概念的方法和分析演讲内容的方法。在提供流行方法的概述以及对应用研究人员的指导之后,每个部分都通过讨论一些最近的论文来结束,这些论文提供了一些可能在其他领域有用的重要方法创新。最后,本文讨论了在使用文本时进行因果推理的少量但不断增长的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods for Analyzing Parliamentary Debates
This chapter provides an overview of popular and recent methods for analyzing the text of legislative debates. It splits commonly used methods into three types: methods that analyze the volume of activity by members, ones that create measures of latent concepts, and ones that analyze the content of speeches. After providing an overview of popular methods as well as guidance to applied researchers, each section concludes by discussing a handful of recent papers that provide some important methodological innovations that may be useful in other domains. It concludes by discussing the small-but-growing literature on making causal inferences when using text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信