协同写作中网络办公应用的可用性评估

M. A. Khan, N. Israr, Sher Hassan
{"title":"协同写作中网络办公应用的可用性评估","authors":"M. A. Khan, N. Israr, Sher Hassan","doi":"10.1109/isms.2010.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability evaluation of collaborative writing system for education usage is essential to improve its functionality. In this paper, the usability of web office (ThinkFree doc) is tested using mix research approach. Usability evaluation is performed via the think aloud protocol. A questionnaire was designed for quantitative survey. The questionnaire was completed by users who have been using Thinkfree doc for educational collaborative work. Interviews were conducted with the selected participants for results validation. During usability evaluation process, positive and negative effects regarding software’s usage were recorded. The results revealed that the overall systems response is very slow. The software needs to improve its processing speed in order to make it more efficient for future use. The system also needs to improve overall functionality (for example collaborative work, synchronization, uploading and track changes) to provide accurate and complete results","PeriodicalId":434315,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation","volume":"2007 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability Evaluation of Web Office Applications in Collaborative Writing\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Khan, N. Israr, Sher Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/isms.2010.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usability evaluation of collaborative writing system for education usage is essential to improve its functionality. In this paper, the usability of web office (ThinkFree doc) is tested using mix research approach. Usability evaluation is performed via the think aloud protocol. A questionnaire was designed for quantitative survey. The questionnaire was completed by users who have been using Thinkfree doc for educational collaborative work. Interviews were conducted with the selected participants for results validation. During usability evaluation process, positive and negative effects regarding software’s usage were recorded. The results revealed that the overall systems response is very slow. The software needs to improve its processing speed in order to make it more efficient for future use. The system also needs to improve overall functionality (for example collaborative work, synchronization, uploading and track changes) to provide accurate and complete results\",\"PeriodicalId\":434315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation\",\"volume\":\"2007 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/isms.2010.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/isms.2010.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

对教学协作写作系统进行可用性评估是提高系统功能的必要条件。本文采用混合研究的方法对网络办公软件(ThinkFree doc)的可用性进行了测试。可用性评估是通过think aloud协议执行的。设计问卷进行定量调查。问卷由使用Thinkfree文档进行教育协作工作的用户完成。与选定的参与者进行访谈以验证结果。在可用性评估过程中,记录了软件使用的积极和消极影响。结果表明,整个系统的响应速度非常慢。该软件需要提高其处理速度,以使其在未来的使用中更有效。系统还需要改进整体功能(例如协同工作、同步、上传和跟踪更改),以提供准确和完整的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability Evaluation of Web Office Applications in Collaborative Writing
Usability evaluation of collaborative writing system for education usage is essential to improve its functionality. In this paper, the usability of web office (ThinkFree doc) is tested using mix research approach. Usability evaluation is performed via the think aloud protocol. A questionnaire was designed for quantitative survey. The questionnaire was completed by users who have been using Thinkfree doc for educational collaborative work. Interviews were conducted with the selected participants for results validation. During usability evaluation process, positive and negative effects regarding software’s usage were recorded. The results revealed that the overall systems response is very slow. The software needs to improve its processing speed in order to make it more efficient for future use. The system also needs to improve overall functionality (for example collaborative work, synchronization, uploading and track changes) to provide accurate and complete results
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信