重新审视证券市场信息操纵犯罪——以刑法修正案十一为视角

Feixiang Fu
{"title":"重新审视证券市场信息操纵犯罪——以刑法修正案十一为视角","authors":"Feixiang Fu","doi":"10.20849/ajsss.v7i8.1262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, the Amendment XI to the Criminal Law and the Latest Judicial Interpretation in 2019 by the Supreme Court and Supreme Procuratorate have made information manipulation a key target of regulation. Information manipulation is a new type of securities manipulation crime in which the perpetrator relies on the abuse of information advantage to induce investors to make decisions in order to indirectly influence the securities market. This behavior has some similarities with traditional trading manipulation, but there are still significant differences in the manipulation methods and the infringement of legal interests, and it is necessary to clarify the rules of its judicial application with typical cases. In addition, it is difficult to judge the subjective intent of information manipulation. Due to the complexity of the act, the previous path of subjective intentional determination has been difficult to apply, so it is necessary to try to establish the judicial presumption path of “objective proof of subjective”. This path is achieved by considering three elements: objective behavior, purposeful intent and complementary factors, which are used to judge the subjective intent of information manipulation.","PeriodicalId":388036,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Manipulation of Securities Market Crimes Revisited: From the Perspective of the Amendment XI to the Criminal Law\",\"authors\":\"Feixiang Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.20849/ajsss.v7i8.1262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2020, the Amendment XI to the Criminal Law and the Latest Judicial Interpretation in 2019 by the Supreme Court and Supreme Procuratorate have made information manipulation a key target of regulation. Information manipulation is a new type of securities manipulation crime in which the perpetrator relies on the abuse of information advantage to induce investors to make decisions in order to indirectly influence the securities market. This behavior has some similarities with traditional trading manipulation, but there are still significant differences in the manipulation methods and the infringement of legal interests, and it is necessary to clarify the rules of its judicial application with typical cases. In addition, it is difficult to judge the subjective intent of information manipulation. Due to the complexity of the act, the previous path of subjective intentional determination has been difficult to apply, so it is necessary to try to establish the judicial presumption path of “objective proof of subjective”. This path is achieved by considering three elements: objective behavior, purposeful intent and complementary factors, which are used to judge the subjective intent of information manipulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v7i8.1262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v7i8.1262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年,最高法院、最高检察院的《刑法修正案(十一)》和2019年最新的《司法解释》都将信息操纵列为重点整治对象。信息操纵是一种新型的证券操纵犯罪,是指行为人利用信息优势诱导投资者做出决策,从而间接影响证券市场。这种行为与传统的交易操纵行为有一定的相似之处,但在操纵方式和对合法权益的侵害方面仍存在显著差异,有必要结合典型案例厘清其司法适用的规则。此外,信息操纵的主观意图也难以判断。由于行为的复杂性,以往主观故意认定的路径已经难以适用,因此有必要尝试建立“客观证明主观”的司法推定路径。这条路径是通过考虑客观行为、目的意图和互补因素三个要素来判断信息操纵的主观意图而实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Manipulation of Securities Market Crimes Revisited: From the Perspective of the Amendment XI to the Criminal Law
In 2020, the Amendment XI to the Criminal Law and the Latest Judicial Interpretation in 2019 by the Supreme Court and Supreme Procuratorate have made information manipulation a key target of regulation. Information manipulation is a new type of securities manipulation crime in which the perpetrator relies on the abuse of information advantage to induce investors to make decisions in order to indirectly influence the securities market. This behavior has some similarities with traditional trading manipulation, but there are still significant differences in the manipulation methods and the infringement of legal interests, and it is necessary to clarify the rules of its judicial application with typical cases. In addition, it is difficult to judge the subjective intent of information manipulation. Due to the complexity of the act, the previous path of subjective intentional determination has been difficult to apply, so it is necessary to try to establish the judicial presumption path of “objective proof of subjective”. This path is achieved by considering three elements: objective behavior, purposeful intent and complementary factors, which are used to judge the subjective intent of information manipulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信