开发虚拟课程电子内容评价概念框架:伊朗大学电子学习中心案例研究。

Peyman Akhavan, M. Arefi
{"title":"开发虚拟课程电子内容评价概念框架:伊朗大学电子学习中心案例研究。","authors":"Peyman Akhavan, M. Arefi","doi":"10.28945/2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to obtain suitable quality criteria for evaluation of electronic content for virtual courses. We attempt to find the aspects which are important in developing e-content for virtual courses and to determine the criteria we need to judge for the quality and efficiency of learning objects and e-content. So we can classify the criteria and formulate conceptual framework for evaluation of e-content. Considering the literature, we identify suitable quality criteria and then apply Delphi for polling the experts’ opinions. By developing the suggested conceptual framework, the contents of two courses which have been developed in an e-learning center of an Iranian University are evaluated by the related experts by using questionnaire and surveying. After reviewing the literature, frameworks and various models for evaluation of electronic content and polling the professors and experts’ opinions in different fields including virtual learning, information technology, instructional technology and system engineering, 22 criteria were identified and they were classified in 4 groups as the following: quality of content and information, appropriateness of content with strategy, appropriateness of content with standard, appropriateness of content with instructional design. Network Security Essentials and Human Resource Management courses in an Iranian University were evaluated using the framework, and the findings indicated areas in design that were weak. The suggested framework in this study is shown to be a suitable tool for evaluating the virtual courses content in virtual universities and institutes. This framework can evaluate any virtual course content in 4 aspects: quality, strategy, standard and instructional design. This study helps virtual Learning service providers and electronic content developers in identifying the drawbacks and strengths in content development and in improving the content quality.","PeriodicalId":104467,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Conceptual Framework for Evaluation of E-Content of Virtual Courses: E-Learning Center of an Iranian University Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Peyman Akhavan, M. Arefi\",\"doi\":\"10.28945/2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to obtain suitable quality criteria for evaluation of electronic content for virtual courses. We attempt to find the aspects which are important in developing e-content for virtual courses and to determine the criteria we need to judge for the quality and efficiency of learning objects and e-content. So we can classify the criteria and formulate conceptual framework for evaluation of e-content. Considering the literature, we identify suitable quality criteria and then apply Delphi for polling the experts’ opinions. By developing the suggested conceptual framework, the contents of two courses which have been developed in an e-learning center of an Iranian University are evaluated by the related experts by using questionnaire and surveying. After reviewing the literature, frameworks and various models for evaluation of electronic content and polling the professors and experts’ opinions in different fields including virtual learning, information technology, instructional technology and system engineering, 22 criteria were identified and they were classified in 4 groups as the following: quality of content and information, appropriateness of content with strategy, appropriateness of content with standard, appropriateness of content with instructional design. Network Security Essentials and Human Resource Management courses in an Iranian University were evaluated using the framework, and the findings indicated areas in design that were weak. The suggested framework in this study is shown to be a suitable tool for evaluating the virtual courses content in virtual universities and institutes. This framework can evaluate any virtual course content in 4 aspects: quality, strategy, standard and instructional design. This study helps virtual Learning service providers and electronic content developers in identifying the drawbacks and strengths in content development and in improving the content quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28945/2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究的目的是为评估虚拟课程的电子内容获得合适的质量标准。我们试图找到开发虚拟课程电子内容的重要方面,并确定判断学习对象和电子内容的质量和效率所需的标准。这样,我们就可以对这些标准进行分类,并制定出评估电子内容的概念框架。根据文献,我们确定了合适的质量标准,然后采用德尔菲法对专家的意见进行投票。通过制定建议的概念框架,相关专家采用问卷和调查的方式对伊朗某大学电子学习中心开发的两门课程的内容进行了评估。在查阅了有关电子内容评价的文献、框架和各种模型,并调查了虚拟学习、信息技术、教学技术和系统工程等不同领域的教授和专家的意见之后,确定了 22 项标准,并将其分为以下 4 组:内容和信息的质量、内容与战略的适当性、内容与标准的适当性、内容与教学设计的适当性。使用该框架对伊朗一所大学的网络安全基础课程和人力资源管理课程进行了评估,评估结果显示了设计薄弱的领域。本研究建议的框架被证明是评估虚拟大学和学院虚拟课程内容的合适工具。该框架可以从质量、策略、标准和教学设计四个方面对任何虚拟课程内容进行评估。这项研究有助于虚拟学习服务提供商和电子内容开发人员找出内容开发的缺点和优点,提高内容质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Conceptual Framework for Evaluation of E-Content of Virtual Courses: E-Learning Center of an Iranian University Case Study.
The purpose of this study is to obtain suitable quality criteria for evaluation of electronic content for virtual courses. We attempt to find the aspects which are important in developing e-content for virtual courses and to determine the criteria we need to judge for the quality and efficiency of learning objects and e-content. So we can classify the criteria and formulate conceptual framework for evaluation of e-content. Considering the literature, we identify suitable quality criteria and then apply Delphi for polling the experts’ opinions. By developing the suggested conceptual framework, the contents of two courses which have been developed in an e-learning center of an Iranian University are evaluated by the related experts by using questionnaire and surveying. After reviewing the literature, frameworks and various models for evaluation of electronic content and polling the professors and experts’ opinions in different fields including virtual learning, information technology, instructional technology and system engineering, 22 criteria were identified and they were classified in 4 groups as the following: quality of content and information, appropriateness of content with strategy, appropriateness of content with standard, appropriateness of content with instructional design. Network Security Essentials and Human Resource Management courses in an Iranian University were evaluated using the framework, and the findings indicated areas in design that were weak. The suggested framework in this study is shown to be a suitable tool for evaluating the virtual courses content in virtual universities and institutes. This framework can evaluate any virtual course content in 4 aspects: quality, strategy, standard and instructional design. This study helps virtual Learning service providers and electronic content developers in identifying the drawbacks and strengths in content development and in improving the content quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信