{"title":"双重固定治疗喙突骨折合并急性肩锁关节断裂:一个病例系列","authors":"","doi":"10.37515/ortho.8231.5301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Management of concomitant coracoid fracture with acute acromioclavicular joint disruption has been a matter of debate. The coracoid component is not always radiographically recognized; thus, this combined orthopedic injury is not often common. Management options varied from conservative to surgical management with single or dual fixation strategy. This study aimed at outcome evaluation of clavicular hook plate with coracoid screw fixation in athletics and patients with high-demand activities for at least one year follow-up. Material and methods: Included patients underwent fixation through clavicular hook plate and coracoid screw. The hook plate was removed after an average period of 16.1 weeks, rehabilitation program was followed. Patients were subjected at final follow-up visit to clinical assessment via ROMs, constant, and ASES scores. Besides, radiological judgement of acromioclavicular joint reduction as per CCD and CCD ratio. Results: The average ASES Scores were 39.1±14.6, 67.4±11.5, and 86.7±5.7 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively with a statistically significant improvement in between (P-value <0.001). The mean active shoulder abduction and forward elevation ROMs were 156.4°±12.8° and 171.4°±6.3°. The average CCD was 9.04±0.9 mm (7.6-10.2 mm), and the mean CCD ratio was 1.07±0.03% (1.01-1.11%). Conclusion: Dual fixation via hook plate and coracoid screw without CCL reconstruction provides a stable fixation construct with considerable functional and radiological outcome in high demand patients with acute traumatic ACJ disruption combined with coracoid fracture. Study Design: Case series study.","PeriodicalId":252930,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual fixation for coracoid fracture with acute acromioclavicular joint disruption: A case series\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.37515/ortho.8231.5301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Management of concomitant coracoid fracture with acute acromioclavicular joint disruption has been a matter of debate. The coracoid component is not always radiographically recognized; thus, this combined orthopedic injury is not often common. Management options varied from conservative to surgical management with single or dual fixation strategy. This study aimed at outcome evaluation of clavicular hook plate with coracoid screw fixation in athletics and patients with high-demand activities for at least one year follow-up. Material and methods: Included patients underwent fixation through clavicular hook plate and coracoid screw. The hook plate was removed after an average period of 16.1 weeks, rehabilitation program was followed. Patients were subjected at final follow-up visit to clinical assessment via ROMs, constant, and ASES scores. Besides, radiological judgement of acromioclavicular joint reduction as per CCD and CCD ratio. Results: The average ASES Scores were 39.1±14.6, 67.4±11.5, and 86.7±5.7 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively with a statistically significant improvement in between (P-value <0.001). The mean active shoulder abduction and forward elevation ROMs were 156.4°±12.8° and 171.4°±6.3°. The average CCD was 9.04±0.9 mm (7.6-10.2 mm), and the mean CCD ratio was 1.07±0.03% (1.01-1.11%). Conclusion: Dual fixation via hook plate and coracoid screw without CCL reconstruction provides a stable fixation construct with considerable functional and radiological outcome in high demand patients with acute traumatic ACJ disruption combined with coracoid fracture. Study Design: Case series study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.5301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.5301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:喙突骨折合并急性肩锁关节断裂的处理一直是一个有争议的问题。喙部并不总是在放射学上被识别;因此,这种合并的骨科损伤并不常见。治疗选择从保守治疗到单或双固定策略的手术治疗。本研究旨在评估锁骨钩钢板与喙突螺钉固定在运动和高要求活动患者中至少一年的随访结果。材料和方法:采用锁骨钩钢板和喙骨螺钉固定。平均16.1周后取下钩钢板,进行康复治疗。患者在最后随访时通过ROMs、constant和ASES评分进行临床评估。根据CCD及CCD比值对肩锁关节复位进行影像学判断。结果:3个月、6个月、12个月患者的平均as评分分别为39.1±14.6分、67.4±11.5分、86.7±5.7分,差异有统计学意义(p值<0.001)。平均主动肩外展和前抬ROMs分别为156.4°±12.8°和171.4°±6.3°。平均CCD为9.04±0.9 mm (7.6 ~ 10.2 mm),平均CCD比值为1.07±0.03%(1.01 ~ 1.11%)。结论:钩钢板+喙突螺钉双固定不重建CCL,为急性外伤性ACJ断裂合并喙突骨折的高需求患者提供了一种稳定的固定结构,具有良好的功能和放射学效果。研究设计:案例系列研究。
Dual fixation for coracoid fracture with acute acromioclavicular joint disruption: A case series
Introduction: Management of concomitant coracoid fracture with acute acromioclavicular joint disruption has been a matter of debate. The coracoid component is not always radiographically recognized; thus, this combined orthopedic injury is not often common. Management options varied from conservative to surgical management with single or dual fixation strategy. This study aimed at outcome evaluation of clavicular hook plate with coracoid screw fixation in athletics and patients with high-demand activities for at least one year follow-up. Material and methods: Included patients underwent fixation through clavicular hook plate and coracoid screw. The hook plate was removed after an average period of 16.1 weeks, rehabilitation program was followed. Patients were subjected at final follow-up visit to clinical assessment via ROMs, constant, and ASES scores. Besides, radiological judgement of acromioclavicular joint reduction as per CCD and CCD ratio. Results: The average ASES Scores were 39.1±14.6, 67.4±11.5, and 86.7±5.7 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively with a statistically significant improvement in between (P-value <0.001). The mean active shoulder abduction and forward elevation ROMs were 156.4°±12.8° and 171.4°±6.3°. The average CCD was 9.04±0.9 mm (7.6-10.2 mm), and the mean CCD ratio was 1.07±0.03% (1.01-1.11%). Conclusion: Dual fixation via hook plate and coracoid screw without CCL reconstruction provides a stable fixation construct with considerable functional and radiological outcome in high demand patients with acute traumatic ACJ disruption combined with coracoid fracture. Study Design: Case series study.