{"title":"冰岛情态动词重访","authors":"Höskuldur Thráinsson","doi":"10.7146/aul.348.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The syntactic differences between epistemic modals and root modals have often been described in terms of raising vs. control: Epistemic modal verbs are then said to be like raising verbs in not assigning a thematic role to their subject and hence allowing raising of embedded arguments to their subject position, whereas root modals are like control verbs, assigning a thematic role to their subject and hence disallowing raising of embedded arguments. This is, for instance, the analysis proposed for Icelandic modals by Thráinsson & Vikner (1995). In this paper it is argued that the control analysis of root modals is appropriate for the so-called subject-oriented readings of root modals but probably not for non-subject-oriented readings.","PeriodicalId":347827,"journal":{"name":"The Sign of the V: Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Icelandic Modal Verbs Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Höskuldur Thráinsson\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/aul.348.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The syntactic differences between epistemic modals and root modals have often been described in terms of raising vs. control: Epistemic modal verbs are then said to be like raising verbs in not assigning a thematic role to their subject and hence allowing raising of embedded arguments to their subject position, whereas root modals are like control verbs, assigning a thematic role to their subject and hence disallowing raising of embedded arguments. This is, for instance, the analysis proposed for Icelandic modals by Thráinsson & Vikner (1995). In this paper it is argued that the control analysis of root modals is appropriate for the so-called subject-oriented readings of root modals but probably not for non-subject-oriented readings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Sign of the V: Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Sign of the V: Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.348.117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Sign of the V: Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.348.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The syntactic differences between epistemic modals and root modals have often been described in terms of raising vs. control: Epistemic modal verbs are then said to be like raising verbs in not assigning a thematic role to their subject and hence allowing raising of embedded arguments to their subject position, whereas root modals are like control verbs, assigning a thematic role to their subject and hence disallowing raising of embedded arguments. This is, for instance, the analysis proposed for Icelandic modals by Thráinsson & Vikner (1995). In this paper it is argued that the control analysis of root modals is appropriate for the so-called subject-oriented readings of root modals but probably not for non-subject-oriented readings.