中国民事执行规则与机制:过去、现在与未来

Zhixun Cao
{"title":"中国民事执行规则与机制:过去、现在与未来","authors":"Zhixun Cao","doi":"10.1080/20517483.2021.1978677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A well-functioning enforcement court is the most crucial safeguard for the success of enforcement, which attracts the attention both internationally and domestically. Civil procedure law statute and its related judicial interpretations, which are experiencing rapid changes and still to be improved, consist of valid rules in the area of enforcement law. After enforcement proceedings are implemented in fact, the difficulty in enforcement began to be taken as a key issue in practice and therefore, led to reform efforts both politically and legally. The ordinary operation of enforcement proceedings could be divided into three parts: commencement and termination of the proceedings and the main part of the procedure. Besides the comparatively well-accepted enforcement rules, the special emphasis in China on the enforcement notice, the Internet-based control and sale of the debtor’s assets and the special possibility of terminating proceedings while admitting failure in enforcement deserve more careful observation. As a general rule, the enforcement court is responsible for the discovery of debtor’s assets, though the current reform plan intends to mitigate the investigative burden of the court. The Chinese judiciary has already announced some general framework in its reform plan. Despite we are undoubtedly concentrating on the developing solution of Chinese problems at national level, there is a strong need to take comparative experience more seriously. Only in this way could Chinese outstanding system of academic discourse be constructed firmly and eventually.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil enforcement rules and mechanism in China: the past, present and the future\",\"authors\":\"Zhixun Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20517483.2021.1978677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A well-functioning enforcement court is the most crucial safeguard for the success of enforcement, which attracts the attention both internationally and domestically. Civil procedure law statute and its related judicial interpretations, which are experiencing rapid changes and still to be improved, consist of valid rules in the area of enforcement law. After enforcement proceedings are implemented in fact, the difficulty in enforcement began to be taken as a key issue in practice and therefore, led to reform efforts both politically and legally. The ordinary operation of enforcement proceedings could be divided into three parts: commencement and termination of the proceedings and the main part of the procedure. Besides the comparatively well-accepted enforcement rules, the special emphasis in China on the enforcement notice, the Internet-based control and sale of the debtor’s assets and the special possibility of terminating proceedings while admitting failure in enforcement deserve more careful observation. As a general rule, the enforcement court is responsible for the discovery of debtor’s assets, though the current reform plan intends to mitigate the investigative burden of the court. The Chinese judiciary has already announced some general framework in its reform plan. Despite we are undoubtedly concentrating on the developing solution of Chinese problems at national level, there is a strong need to take comparative experience more seriously. Only in this way could Chinese outstanding system of academic discourse be constructed firmly and eventually.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2021.1978677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20517483.2021.1978677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个功能完善的执行法院是执行成功的最重要保障,受到国际和国内的广泛关注。民事诉讼法法规及其相关司法解释是在执行法律领域的有效规则,正在经历快速的变化和有待完善的过程。事实上,执行程序实施后,执行困难问题开始成为实践中的一个关键问题,从而引发了政治和法律上的改革努力。执行程序的一般运作可分为程序的开始与终止和程序的主体部分三个部分。除了较为普遍接受的执行规则外,中国特别强调执行通知、基于互联网的债务人资产控制和出售以及承认执行失败时终止诉讼的特殊可能性,都值得我们仔细观察。作为一般规则,执行法院负责发现债务人的资产,尽管目前的改革计划打算减轻法院的调查负担。中国司法机构已经在改革方案中公布了一些总体框架。尽管我们无疑是在集中精力在国家层面上发展中国问题的解决方案,但我们强烈需要更认真地对待比较经验。只有这样,中国优秀的学术话语体系才能最终牢固地构建起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Civil enforcement rules and mechanism in China: the past, present and the future
ABSTRACT A well-functioning enforcement court is the most crucial safeguard for the success of enforcement, which attracts the attention both internationally and domestically. Civil procedure law statute and its related judicial interpretations, which are experiencing rapid changes and still to be improved, consist of valid rules in the area of enforcement law. After enforcement proceedings are implemented in fact, the difficulty in enforcement began to be taken as a key issue in practice and therefore, led to reform efforts both politically and legally. The ordinary operation of enforcement proceedings could be divided into three parts: commencement and termination of the proceedings and the main part of the procedure. Besides the comparatively well-accepted enforcement rules, the special emphasis in China on the enforcement notice, the Internet-based control and sale of the debtor’s assets and the special possibility of terminating proceedings while admitting failure in enforcement deserve more careful observation. As a general rule, the enforcement court is responsible for the discovery of debtor’s assets, though the current reform plan intends to mitigate the investigative burden of the court. The Chinese judiciary has already announced some general framework in its reform plan. Despite we are undoubtedly concentrating on the developing solution of Chinese problems at national level, there is a strong need to take comparative experience more seriously. Only in this way could Chinese outstanding system of academic discourse be constructed firmly and eventually.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信