脑电数据在线递归独立分量分析验证

S. Hsu, T. Mullen, T. Jung, G. Cauwenberghs
{"title":"脑电数据在线递归独立分量分析验证","authors":"S. Hsu, T. Mullen, T. Jung, G. Cauwenberghs","doi":"10.1109/NER.2015.7146775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The needs for online Independent Component Analysis (ICA) algorithms arise in a range of fields such as continuous clinical assessment and brain-computer interface (BCI). Among the online ICA methods, online recursive ICA algorithm (ORICA) has attractive properties of fast convergence and low computational complexity. However, there hasn't been a systematic comparison between an online ICA method such as ORICA and other offline (batch-mode) ICA algorithms on real EEG data. This study compared ORICA with ten ICA algorithms in terms of their decomposition quality, validity of source characteristics, and computational complexity on the thirteen experimental 71-ch EEG datasets. Empirical results showed that ORICA achieved higher mutual information reduction (MIR) and extracted more near-dipolar sources than algorithms such as FastICA, JADE, and SOBI did while the performance of ORICA approached that of the best-performed Infomax-based algorithms. Furthermore, ORICA outperforms most of ICA methods in terms of the computational complexity. The properties of fast convergence and low computational complexity of ORICA enable the realization of real-time online ICA process, which has further applications such as real-time functional neuroimaging, artifact reduction, and adaptive BCI.","PeriodicalId":137451,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating online recursive independent component analysis on EEG data\",\"authors\":\"S. Hsu, T. Mullen, T. Jung, G. Cauwenberghs\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NER.2015.7146775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The needs for online Independent Component Analysis (ICA) algorithms arise in a range of fields such as continuous clinical assessment and brain-computer interface (BCI). Among the online ICA methods, online recursive ICA algorithm (ORICA) has attractive properties of fast convergence and low computational complexity. However, there hasn't been a systematic comparison between an online ICA method such as ORICA and other offline (batch-mode) ICA algorithms on real EEG data. This study compared ORICA with ten ICA algorithms in terms of their decomposition quality, validity of source characteristics, and computational complexity on the thirteen experimental 71-ch EEG datasets. Empirical results showed that ORICA achieved higher mutual information reduction (MIR) and extracted more near-dipolar sources than algorithms such as FastICA, JADE, and SOBI did while the performance of ORICA approached that of the best-performed Infomax-based algorithms. Furthermore, ORICA outperforms most of ICA methods in terms of the computational complexity. The properties of fast convergence and low computational complexity of ORICA enable the realization of real-time online ICA process, which has further applications such as real-time functional neuroimaging, artifact reduction, and adaptive BCI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2015.7146775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2015.7146775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对在线独立成分分析(ICA)算法的需求出现在一系列领域,如连续临床评估和脑机接口(BCI)。在线ICA方法中,在线递归ICA算法(ORICA)具有收敛速度快、计算复杂度低等优点。然而,在线ICA方法(如ORICA)与其他离线(批处理模式)ICA算法在真实脑电数据上的对比研究尚未得到系统的比较。本研究在13个71-ch脑电实验数据集上,比较了ORICA与10种ICA算法的分解质量、源特征有效性和计算复杂度。实证结果表明,与FastICA、JADE和SOBI等算法相比,ORICA实现了更高的互信息约简(MIR),提取了更多的近偶极源,而ORICA的性能接近性能最好的基于informax的算法。此外,ORICA在计算复杂度方面优于大多数ICA方法。ORICA快速收敛和低计算复杂度的特性使其能够实现实时在线ICA过程,在实时功能神经成像、伪影还原和自适应脑机接口等方面有进一步的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating online recursive independent component analysis on EEG data
The needs for online Independent Component Analysis (ICA) algorithms arise in a range of fields such as continuous clinical assessment and brain-computer interface (BCI). Among the online ICA methods, online recursive ICA algorithm (ORICA) has attractive properties of fast convergence and low computational complexity. However, there hasn't been a systematic comparison between an online ICA method such as ORICA and other offline (batch-mode) ICA algorithms on real EEG data. This study compared ORICA with ten ICA algorithms in terms of their decomposition quality, validity of source characteristics, and computational complexity on the thirteen experimental 71-ch EEG datasets. Empirical results showed that ORICA achieved higher mutual information reduction (MIR) and extracted more near-dipolar sources than algorithms such as FastICA, JADE, and SOBI did while the performance of ORICA approached that of the best-performed Infomax-based algorithms. Furthermore, ORICA outperforms most of ICA methods in terms of the computational complexity. The properties of fast convergence and low computational complexity of ORICA enable the realization of real-time online ICA process, which has further applications such as real-time functional neuroimaging, artifact reduction, and adaptive BCI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信