Harry Ramsey, C. Button, K. Davids, Guillaume Hacques, L. Seifert, M. Dicks
{"title":"专家视觉预期中凝视控制的个体差异研究:一项探索性研究","authors":"Harry Ramsey, C. Button, K. Davids, Guillaume Hacques, L. Seifert, M. Dicks","doi":"10.1051/SM/2020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent perspectives for the study of perceptual-motor expertise have highlighted the importance for considering variability in gaze behaviour. The present paper explores the prevalence of variability in gaze behaviour in an anticipation task through examining goalkeepers gaze behaviours when saving soccer penalty kicks, with a primary focus on offering new considerations for the study of variability in gaze behaviour. A subset of data from five goalkeepers in the previously published article of Dicks et al. (2010) (Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 706–720) were reanalysed, with a focus on ten successful penalty saves for each goalkeeper. As the aim was to conduct exploratory analyses of individual differences in goalkeeping performance, data were not averaged across participants and instead intra- and inter-individual differences are described using descriptive statistics. The main observation was that variation in the goalkeepers’ gaze behaviours existed and were evident both between and within individuals, specifically with regards to quiet eye duration but also for percentage viewing time and visual search patterns. However, QE location appeared to represent the only invariant gaze measure with the location being on the ball for the majority of trials. The current exploratory analysis suggested that experienced goalkeepers did not converge on the same gaze patterns during successful anticipation performance. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to extant gaze behaviour literature before considering implications for future research.","PeriodicalId":121091,"journal":{"name":"Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations for the study of individual differences in gaze control during expert visual anticipation: an exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"Harry Ramsey, C. Button, K. Davids, Guillaume Hacques, L. Seifert, M. Dicks\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/SM/2020006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent perspectives for the study of perceptual-motor expertise have highlighted the importance for considering variability in gaze behaviour. The present paper explores the prevalence of variability in gaze behaviour in an anticipation task through examining goalkeepers gaze behaviours when saving soccer penalty kicks, with a primary focus on offering new considerations for the study of variability in gaze behaviour. A subset of data from five goalkeepers in the previously published article of Dicks et al. (2010) (Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 706–720) were reanalysed, with a focus on ten successful penalty saves for each goalkeeper. As the aim was to conduct exploratory analyses of individual differences in goalkeeping performance, data were not averaged across participants and instead intra- and inter-individual differences are described using descriptive statistics. The main observation was that variation in the goalkeepers’ gaze behaviours existed and were evident both between and within individuals, specifically with regards to quiet eye duration but also for percentage viewing time and visual search patterns. However, QE location appeared to represent the only invariant gaze measure with the location being on the ball for the majority of trials. The current exploratory analysis suggested that experienced goalkeepers did not converge on the same gaze patterns during successful anticipation performance. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to extant gaze behaviour literature before considering implications for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/SM/2020006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/SM/2020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
最近对知觉运动专业知识研究的观点强调了考虑凝视行为可变性的重要性。本文通过研究守门员在扑出足球点球时的凝视行为,探讨了在预期任务中凝视行为变异性的普遍性,主要关注于为凝视行为变异性的研究提供新的考虑。Dicks et al.(2010)先前发表的文章(Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 706-720)中来自五位门将的数据子集被重新分析,重点是每位门将的10次成功点球扑救。由于目的是对守门员表现的个体差异进行探索性分析,数据没有在参与者之间平均,而是使用描述性统计来描述个体内部和个体间的差异。主要观察结果是,守门员凝视行为的差异存在,并且在个体之间和个体内部都很明显,特别是在静眼持续时间、观看时间百分比和视觉搜索模式方面。然而,在大多数试验中,QE位置似乎代表了唯一不变的凝视测量,位置在球上。目前的探索性分析表明,经验丰富的守门员在成功的预期表现中并没有集中在相同的注视模式上。在考虑对未来研究的影响之前,讨论了这些发现与现有凝视行为文献的关系。
Considerations for the study of individual differences in gaze control during expert visual anticipation: an exploratory study
Recent perspectives for the study of perceptual-motor expertise have highlighted the importance for considering variability in gaze behaviour. The present paper explores the prevalence of variability in gaze behaviour in an anticipation task through examining goalkeepers gaze behaviours when saving soccer penalty kicks, with a primary focus on offering new considerations for the study of variability in gaze behaviour. A subset of data from five goalkeepers in the previously published article of Dicks et al. (2010) (Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 706–720) were reanalysed, with a focus on ten successful penalty saves for each goalkeeper. As the aim was to conduct exploratory analyses of individual differences in goalkeeping performance, data were not averaged across participants and instead intra- and inter-individual differences are described using descriptive statistics. The main observation was that variation in the goalkeepers’ gaze behaviours existed and were evident both between and within individuals, specifically with regards to quiet eye duration but also for percentage viewing time and visual search patterns. However, QE location appeared to represent the only invariant gaze measure with the location being on the ball for the majority of trials. The current exploratory analysis suggested that experienced goalkeepers did not converge on the same gaze patterns during successful anticipation performance. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to extant gaze behaviour literature before considering implications for future research.