皮肤和粘膜黑色素瘤中DNA损伤和DNA修复基因表达诱导的意义

Tyler Kloweit, L. Buckingham, Nicholas Gattuso, B. Tajudeen, P. Batra, V. Reddy, P. Gattuso
{"title":"皮肤和粘膜黑色素瘤中DNA损伤和DNA修复基因表达诱导的意义","authors":"Tyler Kloweit, L. Buckingham, Nicholas Gattuso, B. Tajudeen, P. Batra, V. Reddy, P. Gattuso","doi":"10.18314/gjct.v4i1.1418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study addressed implications of DNA damage and repair in radiation induced cutaneous melanoma (CM) compared to de novo arising mucosal melanoma (MM). The role of DNA repair was assessed through two DNA repair genes: the human DNA repair genes XRCC3 and RAD5. These genes were selected based on significant homology to the radio-resistant Deinococcus radiodurans RecA (46.8% and 42.9% homology, respectively).Methods: DNA damage in melanoma was assessed and quantified by immunoassay for a marker of DNA damage, 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). Gene expression analysis was measured by RT-qPCR.Results: In cutaneous melanoma, DNA damage was significantly higher in tumor than adjacent non-malignant tissue (p = 0.001 < 0.05). In contrast, for MM, DNA damage was similar in the non-malignant tissue and tumor (p = 0.965 > 0.05). Alcohol use was correlated with higher DNA damage in the MM (p = 0.036 < 0.05) than in the cutaneous melanoma patients (p = 0.104 > 0.05). The high DNA damage in mucosal tissue was not accompanied by induction of XRCC3 and RAD51 expression, compared to non-malignant tissue adjacent to CM.Conclusions: These observations are consistent with a pre-cancerous condition in MM, one in which repair functions are not induced and DNA damage is allowed to accumulate. Defects in repair functions may increase susceptibility to therapy with DNA damaging agents.","PeriodicalId":140922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of DNA Damage and Induction of DNA Repair Gene Expression in Cutaneous vs Mucosal Melanoma\",\"authors\":\"Tyler Kloweit, L. Buckingham, Nicholas Gattuso, B. Tajudeen, P. Batra, V. Reddy, P. Gattuso\",\"doi\":\"10.18314/gjct.v4i1.1418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study addressed implications of DNA damage and repair in radiation induced cutaneous melanoma (CM) compared to de novo arising mucosal melanoma (MM). The role of DNA repair was assessed through two DNA repair genes: the human DNA repair genes XRCC3 and RAD5. These genes were selected based on significant homology to the radio-resistant Deinococcus radiodurans RecA (46.8% and 42.9% homology, respectively).Methods: DNA damage in melanoma was assessed and quantified by immunoassay for a marker of DNA damage, 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). Gene expression analysis was measured by RT-qPCR.Results: In cutaneous melanoma, DNA damage was significantly higher in tumor than adjacent non-malignant tissue (p = 0.001 < 0.05). In contrast, for MM, DNA damage was similar in the non-malignant tissue and tumor (p = 0.965 > 0.05). Alcohol use was correlated with higher DNA damage in the MM (p = 0.036 < 0.05) than in the cutaneous melanoma patients (p = 0.104 > 0.05). The high DNA damage in mucosal tissue was not accompanied by induction of XRCC3 and RAD51 expression, compared to non-malignant tissue adjacent to CM.Conclusions: These observations are consistent with a pre-cancerous condition in MM, one in which repair functions are not induced and DNA damage is allowed to accumulate. Defects in repair functions may increase susceptibility to therapy with DNA damaging agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18314/gjct.v4i1.1418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18314/gjct.v4i1.1418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究探讨了辐射诱发的皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)与新生粘膜黑色素瘤(MM) DNA损伤和修复的意义。通过两个DNA修复基因:人类DNA修复基因XRCC3和RAD5来评估DNA修复的作用。这些基因与耐辐射耐药耐辐射球菌RecA具有显著的同源性(同源性分别为46.8%和42.9%)。方法:采用DNA损伤标志物8-羟基-2′-脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)的免疫测定法对黑色素瘤的DNA损伤进行评估和定量。RT-qPCR检测基因表达。结果:在皮肤黑色素瘤中,肿瘤DNA损伤明显高于邻近非恶性组织(p = 0.001 < 0.05)。MM非恶性组织与肿瘤组织DNA损伤相似(p = 0.965 > 0.05)。与皮肤黑色素瘤患者(p = 0.104 > 0.05)相比,MM患者饮酒与更高的DNA损伤相关(p = 0.036 < 0.05)。与CM附近的非恶性组织相比,粘膜组织的高DNA损伤不伴有XRCC3和RAD51的诱导表达。结论:这些观察结果与MM的癌前状态一致,其中修复功能不被诱导,DNA损伤被允许积累。修复功能缺陷可能增加对DNA损伤剂治疗的易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implications of DNA Damage and Induction of DNA Repair Gene Expression in Cutaneous vs Mucosal Melanoma
Background: This study addressed implications of DNA damage and repair in radiation induced cutaneous melanoma (CM) compared to de novo arising mucosal melanoma (MM). The role of DNA repair was assessed through two DNA repair genes: the human DNA repair genes XRCC3 and RAD5. These genes were selected based on significant homology to the radio-resistant Deinococcus radiodurans RecA (46.8% and 42.9% homology, respectively).Methods: DNA damage in melanoma was assessed and quantified by immunoassay for a marker of DNA damage, 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). Gene expression analysis was measured by RT-qPCR.Results: In cutaneous melanoma, DNA damage was significantly higher in tumor than adjacent non-malignant tissue (p = 0.001 < 0.05). In contrast, for MM, DNA damage was similar in the non-malignant tissue and tumor (p = 0.965 > 0.05). Alcohol use was correlated with higher DNA damage in the MM (p = 0.036 < 0.05) than in the cutaneous melanoma patients (p = 0.104 > 0.05). The high DNA damage in mucosal tissue was not accompanied by induction of XRCC3 and RAD51 expression, compared to non-malignant tissue adjacent to CM.Conclusions: These observations are consistent with a pre-cancerous condition in MM, one in which repair functions are not induced and DNA damage is allowed to accumulate. Defects in repair functions may increase susceptibility to therapy with DNA damaging agents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信