科学知识中的问题情境、问题及其表达的语言形式

B. Yashin
{"title":"科学知识中的问题情境、问题及其表达的语言形式","authors":"B. Yashin","doi":"10.31618/2658-7556-2019-38-11-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on problems and problematic situations arising in scientific knowledge, as well as related antinomies and paradoxes, their interpretation and understanding of the role of these phenomena in the development of science. Their study is now considered by many scientists and philosophers to be one of the promising directions in the field of philosophy and methodology of science. \nThe work showed that the problem situation as an objective error of inconsistency, incomplete or contradictory knowledge was found in a problem formulated in the language of a given science, where a certain contradiction was recorded, the nature of which determined a particular type of problem situation. The author therefore draws particular attention to contradictions called paradoxes or antinomias. As a result of the comparison of their interpretations by foreign and domestic researchers, the most important characteristics of paradoxes and antinomies are identified, as well as their differences from each other are revealed by their nature, their origin and methods of resolution. \nThe article reveals the essence (mechanism) of the transition from the problem situation as an objective difficulty to its formal (language) expression - antinomia, paradox or logical policy and further - to the formulation of the problem. And it is also justified that the problem itself, by determining the subject 's choice of options to find a solution to it, that is, a strategy to resolve antinomies or paradoxes and eliminate logical contradictions, actually becomes the beginning of further research","PeriodicalId":285521,"journal":{"name":"Chronos Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROBLEM SITUATION, PROBLEM AND LANGUAGE FORMS OF THEIR EXPRESSION IN SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE\",\"authors\":\"B. Yashin\",\"doi\":\"10.31618/2658-7556-2019-38-11-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article focuses on problems and problematic situations arising in scientific knowledge, as well as related antinomies and paradoxes, their interpretation and understanding of the role of these phenomena in the development of science. Their study is now considered by many scientists and philosophers to be one of the promising directions in the field of philosophy and methodology of science. \\nThe work showed that the problem situation as an objective error of inconsistency, incomplete or contradictory knowledge was found in a problem formulated in the language of a given science, where a certain contradiction was recorded, the nature of which determined a particular type of problem situation. The author therefore draws particular attention to contradictions called paradoxes or antinomias. As a result of the comparison of their interpretations by foreign and domestic researchers, the most important characteristics of paradoxes and antinomies are identified, as well as their differences from each other are revealed by their nature, their origin and methods of resolution. \\nThe article reveals the essence (mechanism) of the transition from the problem situation as an objective difficulty to its formal (language) expression - antinomia, paradox or logical policy and further - to the formulation of the problem. And it is also justified that the problem itself, by determining the subject 's choice of options to find a solution to it, that is, a strategy to resolve antinomies or paradoxes and eliminate logical contradictions, actually becomes the beginning of further research\",\"PeriodicalId\":285521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronos Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronos Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31618/2658-7556-2019-38-11-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronos Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31618/2658-7556-2019-38-11-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文着重讨论科学知识中出现的问题和问题情境,以及相关的二律背反和悖论,以及对这些现象在科学发展中的作用的解释和认识。它们的研究现在被许多科学家和哲学家认为是哲学和科学方法论领域的一个有前途的方向。这项工作表明,作为不一致、不完整或矛盾知识的客观错误的问题情况是在用特定科学的语言表述的问题中发现的,其中记录了某种矛盾,其性质决定了特定类型的问题情况。因此,作者提请特别注意被称为悖论或反律法的矛盾。通过对国内外学者对矛盾和二律背反的解释进行比较,找出了矛盾和二律背反最重要的特征,并揭示了它们在性质、起源和解决方法上的差异。本文揭示了从作为客观困难的问题情境到其形式(语言)表达——反律法、悖论或逻辑策略,进而到问题公式化的本质(机制)。问题本身,通过确定主体的选项选择来找到解决问题的方法,即解决二律背反或悖论并消除逻辑矛盾的策略,实际上成为进一步研究的开始,这也是合理的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROBLEM SITUATION, PROBLEM AND LANGUAGE FORMS OF THEIR EXPRESSION IN SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
The article focuses on problems and problematic situations arising in scientific knowledge, as well as related antinomies and paradoxes, their interpretation and understanding of the role of these phenomena in the development of science. Their study is now considered by many scientists and philosophers to be one of the promising directions in the field of philosophy and methodology of science. The work showed that the problem situation as an objective error of inconsistency, incomplete or contradictory knowledge was found in a problem formulated in the language of a given science, where a certain contradiction was recorded, the nature of which determined a particular type of problem situation. The author therefore draws particular attention to contradictions called paradoxes or antinomias. As a result of the comparison of their interpretations by foreign and domestic researchers, the most important characteristics of paradoxes and antinomies are identified, as well as their differences from each other are revealed by their nature, their origin and methods of resolution. The article reveals the essence (mechanism) of the transition from the problem situation as an objective difficulty to its formal (language) expression - antinomia, paradox or logical policy and further - to the formulation of the problem. And it is also justified that the problem itself, by determining the subject 's choice of options to find a solution to it, that is, a strategy to resolve antinomies or paradoxes and eliminate logical contradictions, actually becomes the beginning of further research
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信