产β -内酰胺酶肠杆菌科重症患者的分子特征

Richa Gupta, A. Malik, M. Rizvi, S. Ahmed
{"title":"产β -内酰胺酶肠杆菌科重症患者的分子特征","authors":"Richa Gupta, A. Malik, M. Rizvi, S. Ahmed","doi":"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_20_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was done to assess the prevalence of beta-lactamases and biofilm production in general and blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV and blaAmpC in particular amongst Enterobacteriaceae members in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: Samples were collected aseptically from 210 ICU patients from February 2012 to December 2015. Culture, identification, antimicrobial susceptibility, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC, metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) and biofilm detection were done according to the standard protocol. Polymerase chain reaction analysis for beta-lactamase genes of the family CTX-M, TEM, SHV and AmpC was carried out. Results: Amongst 200 pathogens, most commonly isolated Enterobacteriaceae member was Escherichia coli (2 [26%]), Klebsiella pneumonia (37 [18.5%]), Klebsiella oxytoca (12 [6%]), followed by Citrobacter species (33 [16.5%]) and Serratia species (15 [8%]). E. coli (29 [55.7%]) was most commonly associated with urinary tract infection; however, the frequency of K. pneumoniae (18 [48.6%]), K. oxytoca (5 [41.6%]) and Citrobacter koseri (20 [33%]) was higher in lower respiratory tract, bloodstream and surgical site infections, respectively. Phenotypically, prevalence of ESBL, AmpC and MBL amongst Enterobacteriaceae members was 50.2%, 36.6% and 12.3%, respectively. However, blaCTX-M and blaAmpC genes were detected in 48% and 32.4% of members, respectively. BlaTEM and blaSHV were not detected in any of the isolates. The average hospital stay of ICU patients was 21 days and was associated with 48.5% mortality. Conclusion: There is a great need for informed antibiotic treatment guided by not only routine antimicrobial susceptibility but also by knowledge of ESBL, AmpC and MBL status of the isolate.","PeriodicalId":310565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular characterisation of beta-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae members from critical care patients\",\"authors\":\"Richa Gupta, A. Malik, M. Rizvi, S. Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_20_17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study was done to assess the prevalence of beta-lactamases and biofilm production in general and blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV and blaAmpC in particular amongst Enterobacteriaceae members in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: Samples were collected aseptically from 210 ICU patients from February 2012 to December 2015. Culture, identification, antimicrobial susceptibility, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC, metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) and biofilm detection were done according to the standard protocol. Polymerase chain reaction analysis for beta-lactamase genes of the family CTX-M, TEM, SHV and AmpC was carried out. Results: Amongst 200 pathogens, most commonly isolated Enterobacteriaceae member was Escherichia coli (2 [26%]), Klebsiella pneumonia (37 [18.5%]), Klebsiella oxytoca (12 [6%]), followed by Citrobacter species (33 [16.5%]) and Serratia species (15 [8%]). E. coli (29 [55.7%]) was most commonly associated with urinary tract infection; however, the frequency of K. pneumoniae (18 [48.6%]), K. oxytoca (5 [41.6%]) and Citrobacter koseri (20 [33%]) was higher in lower respiratory tract, bloodstream and surgical site infections, respectively. Phenotypically, prevalence of ESBL, AmpC and MBL amongst Enterobacteriaceae members was 50.2%, 36.6% and 12.3%, respectively. However, blaCTX-M and blaAmpC genes were detected in 48% and 32.4% of members, respectively. BlaTEM and blaSHV were not detected in any of the isolates. The average hospital stay of ICU patients was 21 days and was associated with 48.5% mortality. Conclusion: There is a great need for informed antibiotic treatment guided by not only routine antimicrobial susceptibility but also by knowledge of ESBL, AmpC and MBL status of the isolate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_20_17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_20_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估重症监护病房(ICU)患者肠杆菌科成员中β -内酰胺酶和生物膜生成的总体患病率,以及blaCTX-M、blactem、blaSHV和blaAmpC的患病率。材料与方法:对2012年2月至2015年12月210例ICU患者进行无菌采集。按照标准方案进行培养、鉴定、药敏、广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBLs)、AmpC、金属β -内酰胺酶(MBL)和生物膜检测。对CTX-M、TEM、SHV和AmpC家族β -内酰胺酶基因进行聚合酶链反应分析。结果:200种病原菌中,分离最多的肠杆菌科病原菌为大肠埃希菌2种(26%)、肺炎克雷伯菌37种(18.5%)、氧化克雷伯菌12种(6%),其次为柠檬酸杆菌33种(16.5%)、沙雷菌15种(8%)。大肠杆菌(29例[55.7%])最常与尿路感染相关;肺炎克雷伯菌(18例[48.6%])、氧化克雷伯菌(5例[41.6%])和克塞利柠檬酸杆菌(20例[33%])在下呼吸道感染、血流感染和手术部位感染中分别较高。表型上,肠杆菌科成员中ESBL、AmpC和MBL的患病率分别为50.2%、36.6%和12.3%。而blaCTX-M和blaAmpC基因分别在48%和32.4%的成员中检测到。所有分离株均未检出BlaTEM和blaSHV。ICU患者平均住院时间为21天,死亡率为48.5%。结论:除了常规药敏外,还需要了解分离株的ESBL、AmpC和MBL状态,以指导知情的抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular characterisation of beta-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae members from critical care patients
Background: This study was done to assess the prevalence of beta-lactamases and biofilm production in general and blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV and blaAmpC in particular amongst Enterobacteriaceae members in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. Materials and Methods: Samples were collected aseptically from 210 ICU patients from February 2012 to December 2015. Culture, identification, antimicrobial susceptibility, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC, metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) and biofilm detection were done according to the standard protocol. Polymerase chain reaction analysis for beta-lactamase genes of the family CTX-M, TEM, SHV and AmpC was carried out. Results: Amongst 200 pathogens, most commonly isolated Enterobacteriaceae member was Escherichia coli (2 [26%]), Klebsiella pneumonia (37 [18.5%]), Klebsiella oxytoca (12 [6%]), followed by Citrobacter species (33 [16.5%]) and Serratia species (15 [8%]). E. coli (29 [55.7%]) was most commonly associated with urinary tract infection; however, the frequency of K. pneumoniae (18 [48.6%]), K. oxytoca (5 [41.6%]) and Citrobacter koseri (20 [33%]) was higher in lower respiratory tract, bloodstream and surgical site infections, respectively. Phenotypically, prevalence of ESBL, AmpC and MBL amongst Enterobacteriaceae members was 50.2%, 36.6% and 12.3%, respectively. However, blaCTX-M and blaAmpC genes were detected in 48% and 32.4% of members, respectively. BlaTEM and blaSHV were not detected in any of the isolates. The average hospital stay of ICU patients was 21 days and was associated with 48.5% mortality. Conclusion: There is a great need for informed antibiotic treatment guided by not only routine antimicrobial susceptibility but also by knowledge of ESBL, AmpC and MBL status of the isolate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信