技术绝缘液体中的高速灾难性事件

A. Jaksts, G. Blanchet
{"title":"技术绝缘液体中的高速灾难性事件","authors":"A. Jaksts, G. Blanchet","doi":"10.1109/ELINSL.2006.1665263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As liquid breakdown modeling is still in its infancy, dielectric breakdown tests remain one source of input regarding the design of an insulation system for power apparatus. The relevance of small scale tests has long been known to be limited. It is known that designers would never dare to use the strengths seen in such tests. The paper argues that one aspect that may describe the reason for the discrepancy is that the physics controlling the breakdown are different for the small scale tests when comparing to the breakdowns observed in large technical insulation systems. Experimental data are presented showing that catastrophic events of technical interest arise in different liquids at different voltage levels. Voltage differences obtained with the impulse overvoltage method are not seen when 'traditional' small scale breakdown tests are performed","PeriodicalId":427638,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High speed catastrophic events in technical insulating liquids\",\"authors\":\"A. Jaksts, G. Blanchet\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ELINSL.2006.1665263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As liquid breakdown modeling is still in its infancy, dielectric breakdown tests remain one source of input regarding the design of an insulation system for power apparatus. The relevance of small scale tests has long been known to be limited. It is known that designers would never dare to use the strengths seen in such tests. The paper argues that one aspect that may describe the reason for the discrepancy is that the physics controlling the breakdown are different for the small scale tests when comparing to the breakdowns observed in large technical insulation systems. Experimental data are presented showing that catastrophic events of technical interest arise in different liquids at different voltage levels. Voltage differences obtained with the impulse overvoltage method are not seen when 'traditional' small scale breakdown tests are performed\",\"PeriodicalId\":427638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINSL.2006.1665263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINSL.2006.1665263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

由于液体击穿模型仍处于起步阶段,介质击穿测试仍然是电力设备绝缘系统设计的一个输入来源。长期以来,小规模试验的相关性一直被认为是有限的。众所周知,设计师永远不敢使用在此类测试中看到的优势。本文认为,造成这种差异的一个原因是,与在大型技术绝缘系统中观察到的击穿相比,在小规模试验中控制击穿的物理特性是不同的。实验数据表明,在不同的电压水平下,不同的液体会产生技术上感兴趣的灾难性事件。当进行“传统”小规模击穿试验时,用脉冲过电压法获得的电压差是看不到的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High speed catastrophic events in technical insulating liquids
As liquid breakdown modeling is still in its infancy, dielectric breakdown tests remain one source of input regarding the design of an insulation system for power apparatus. The relevance of small scale tests has long been known to be limited. It is known that designers would never dare to use the strengths seen in such tests. The paper argues that one aspect that may describe the reason for the discrepancy is that the physics controlling the breakdown are different for the small scale tests when comparing to the breakdowns observed in large technical insulation systems. Experimental data are presented showing that catastrophic events of technical interest arise in different liquids at different voltage levels. Voltage differences obtained with the impulse overvoltage method are not seen when 'traditional' small scale breakdown tests are performed
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信