国际财务报告准则实施中影响印尼上市公司资产重估的因素

Yossi Diantimala, S. Syahnur, R. Ridwan
{"title":"国际财务报告准则实施中影响印尼上市公司资产重估的因素","authors":"Yossi Diantimala, S. Syahnur, R. Ridwan","doi":"10.2991/AGC-18.2019.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of financial factors on companies’ decision to apply assets revaluation method or to stay with cost model during the mandatory implementation of IFRSs in Indonesia. The adoption of IFRSs accounting standards and non IFRSs-based accounting standards differs in emphasis on applying asset revaluation. Non-IFRSs accounting standards do not require asset revaluation. The implementation of IFRSs-based standards requires companies to use asset revaluation method to value their fixed assets. Therefore, all listed companies must apply asset revaluation. In fact, not all listed companies in Indonesia apply asset revaluation. This study intends to test firms’ decision to implement asset revaluation or to stay with cost model under the condition of the company has implemented IFRSs. This study uses a standards logistic model to examine the effect of financial factors on firm decision to revalue their fixed assets. Sample firms used in this study are the firms listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periods 2013 – 2016. Sample firms consist of 850 firms stay with cost model and 262 firms choose asset revaluation. Therefore, the observation is relatively large 1112 firms – years. The results show that the companies that implement asset revaluation are the companies with higher leverage and lower investment opportunities two years before the companies applied asset revaluation. The findings also present that the companies decide to implement asset revaluation when their financial liquidity and fixed assets intention one year before are higher. From the firm size perspective, bigger firms are more likely to choose asset revaluation. However, smaller firms stay with cost model to revalue their fixed assets. As general, this finding has succeeded to support the hypothesis and previous literatures. Keywords— Financial determination; Asset revaluation; Cost model, IFRSs","PeriodicalId":258200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Asset Revaluation by Indonesian Listed Companies in IFRSs Implementation\",\"authors\":\"Yossi Diantimala, S. Syahnur, R. Ridwan\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/AGC-18.2019.68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of financial factors on companies’ decision to apply assets revaluation method or to stay with cost model during the mandatory implementation of IFRSs in Indonesia. The adoption of IFRSs accounting standards and non IFRSs-based accounting standards differs in emphasis on applying asset revaluation. Non-IFRSs accounting standards do not require asset revaluation. The implementation of IFRSs-based standards requires companies to use asset revaluation method to value their fixed assets. Therefore, all listed companies must apply asset revaluation. In fact, not all listed companies in Indonesia apply asset revaluation. This study intends to test firms’ decision to implement asset revaluation or to stay with cost model under the condition of the company has implemented IFRSs. This study uses a standards logistic model to examine the effect of financial factors on firm decision to revalue their fixed assets. Sample firms used in this study are the firms listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periods 2013 – 2016. Sample firms consist of 850 firms stay with cost model and 262 firms choose asset revaluation. Therefore, the observation is relatively large 1112 firms – years. The results show that the companies that implement asset revaluation are the companies with higher leverage and lower investment opportunities two years before the companies applied asset revaluation. The findings also present that the companies decide to implement asset revaluation when their financial liquidity and fixed assets intention one year before are higher. From the firm size perspective, bigger firms are more likely to choose asset revaluation. However, smaller firms stay with cost model to revalue their fixed assets. As general, this finding has succeeded to support the hypothesis and previous literatures. Keywords— Financial determination; Asset revaluation; Cost model, IFRSs\",\"PeriodicalId\":258200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/AGC-18.2019.68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/AGC-18.2019.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是考察财务因素对公司在印度尼西亚强制实施国际财务报告准则期间采用资产重估方法或保留成本模型的决定的影响。采用国际财务报告准则的会计准则和采用非国际财务报告准则的会计准则在强调应用资产重估方面有所不同。非国际财务报告准则会计准则不要求资产重估。国际财务报告准则的实施要求企业采用资产重估法对其固定资产进行估值。因此,所有上市公司都必须进行资产重估。事实上,并不是所有的印尼上市公司都采用资产重估。本研究旨在检验企业在实施国际财务报告准则的情况下实施资产重估或继续使用成本模型的决策。本研究采用标准逻辑模型检验财务因素对企业固定资产重估决策的影响。本研究中使用的样本公司是2013 - 2016年期间在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的公司。样本企业中选择成本模型的有850家,选择资产重估的有262家。因此,观测值比较大,为1112家公司-年。结果表明,实施资产重估的公司是在实施资产重估前两年杠杆率较高、投资机会较低的公司。研究结果还表明,当企业一年前的财务流动性和固定资产意愿较高时,企业决定实施资产重估。从企业规模来看,规模较大的企业更有可能选择资产重估。然而,规模较小的企业仍然采用成本模型对其固定资产进行重估。总的来说,这一发现成功地支持了假设和以前的文献。关键词:财务决策;资产重估;成本模型,国际财务报告准则
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing Asset Revaluation by Indonesian Listed Companies in IFRSs Implementation
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of financial factors on companies’ decision to apply assets revaluation method or to stay with cost model during the mandatory implementation of IFRSs in Indonesia. The adoption of IFRSs accounting standards and non IFRSs-based accounting standards differs in emphasis on applying asset revaluation. Non-IFRSs accounting standards do not require asset revaluation. The implementation of IFRSs-based standards requires companies to use asset revaluation method to value their fixed assets. Therefore, all listed companies must apply asset revaluation. In fact, not all listed companies in Indonesia apply asset revaluation. This study intends to test firms’ decision to implement asset revaluation or to stay with cost model under the condition of the company has implemented IFRSs. This study uses a standards logistic model to examine the effect of financial factors on firm decision to revalue their fixed assets. Sample firms used in this study are the firms listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periods 2013 – 2016. Sample firms consist of 850 firms stay with cost model and 262 firms choose asset revaluation. Therefore, the observation is relatively large 1112 firms – years. The results show that the companies that implement asset revaluation are the companies with higher leverage and lower investment opportunities two years before the companies applied asset revaluation. The findings also present that the companies decide to implement asset revaluation when their financial liquidity and fixed assets intention one year before are higher. From the firm size perspective, bigger firms are more likely to choose asset revaluation. However, smaller firms stay with cost model to revalue their fixed assets. As general, this finding has succeeded to support the hypothesis and previous literatures. Keywords— Financial determination; Asset revaluation; Cost model, IFRSs
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信