学生对远程教育非论文硕士课程的看法

Ö. F. Tutkun, DUYGU GÜR ERDOĞAN, Z. Demirtaş
{"title":"学生对远程教育非论文硕士课程的看法","authors":"Ö. F. Tutkun, DUYGU GÜR ERDOĞAN, Z. Demirtaş","doi":"10.15345/IOJES.2014.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of the study is to evaluate the functionality of curriculum Distance Education Nonthesis Master according to students’ opinions. Based on the main aim of the research, the subproblems are how much teaching-learning process is reached its objectives and what the benefits, quality, and gains of the Distance Education Non-thesis Master are according to students’ opinions. The study group of the research was consisted of 23 students. Research method is triangulation method. For quantitative data “Non- thesis Master’s Program Evaluation Questionnaire” which was developed by researchers. For qualitative data structured interview was used. The following results were obtained: 1- The quality of the program is high. 2- The contribution of the program concentrated mostly on increasing of the student perspective. 3- The students enrolled in the program for the reason of improving themselves. 4- There is no meaningful difference between the quality and gains of the program and the causes of the enrollment in the program in terms of gender, marital status, workplace, age, current status and length of work. 5- The most advantageous feature of the program is that there is no time and place limitation. The most disadvantageous feature is that the program is superficial and it does not give a chance to face-to-face interaction. 6- The participants’ views on the expectation and satisfaction level are the increase of educational qualification and gaining more than the expectations. 7- The contributions of the program to the participants are the increase of teaching profession and the increase of the interest to the field.","PeriodicalId":358961,"journal":{"name":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Opinions of Students toward Curriculum of Distance Education Non- Thesis Master\",\"authors\":\"Ö. F. Tutkun, DUYGU GÜR ERDOĞAN, Z. Demirtaş\",\"doi\":\"10.15345/IOJES.2014.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main aim of the study is to evaluate the functionality of curriculum Distance Education Nonthesis Master according to students’ opinions. Based on the main aim of the research, the subproblems are how much teaching-learning process is reached its objectives and what the benefits, quality, and gains of the Distance Education Non-thesis Master are according to students’ opinions. The study group of the research was consisted of 23 students. Research method is triangulation method. For quantitative data “Non- thesis Master’s Program Evaluation Questionnaire” which was developed by researchers. For qualitative data structured interview was used. The following results were obtained: 1- The quality of the program is high. 2- The contribution of the program concentrated mostly on increasing of the student perspective. 3- The students enrolled in the program for the reason of improving themselves. 4- There is no meaningful difference between the quality and gains of the program and the causes of the enrollment in the program in terms of gender, marital status, workplace, age, current status and length of work. 5- The most advantageous feature of the program is that there is no time and place limitation. The most disadvantageous feature is that the program is superficial and it does not give a chance to face-to-face interaction. 6- The participants’ views on the expectation and satisfaction level are the increase of educational qualification and gaining more than the expectations. 7- The contributions of the program to the participants are the increase of teaching profession and the increase of the interest to the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15345/IOJES.2014.02.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15345/IOJES.2014.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是根据学生的意见来评估远程教育非论文硕士课程的功能。基于本研究的主要目的,子问题包括教学过程达到了多少目标,以及学生认为远程教育非论文硕士的效益、质量和收益如何。本研究的学习小组由23名学生组成。研究方法为三角测量法。在定量数据方面,研究人员编制了《硕士项目非论文评价问卷》。定性数据采用结构化访谈法。结果如下:1-课程质量高。这个项目的贡献主要集中在增加学生的视角上。学生们参加这个项目是为了提高自己。4-项目的质量和收益与入读项目的原因在性别、婚姻状况、工作地点、年龄、现状、工作年限等方面无显著差异。这个项目最大的优点是没有时间和地点的限制。最不利的特点是节目肤浅,不给面对面交流的机会。6-参与者对期望和满意度的看法是学历的提高和获得超过期望。7-该计划对参与者的贡献是教学专业的增加和对该领域的兴趣的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Opinions of Students toward Curriculum of Distance Education Non- Thesis Master
The main aim of the study is to evaluate the functionality of curriculum Distance Education Nonthesis Master according to students’ opinions. Based on the main aim of the research, the subproblems are how much teaching-learning process is reached its objectives and what the benefits, quality, and gains of the Distance Education Non-thesis Master are according to students’ opinions. The study group of the research was consisted of 23 students. Research method is triangulation method. For quantitative data “Non- thesis Master’s Program Evaluation Questionnaire” which was developed by researchers. For qualitative data structured interview was used. The following results were obtained: 1- The quality of the program is high. 2- The contribution of the program concentrated mostly on increasing of the student perspective. 3- The students enrolled in the program for the reason of improving themselves. 4- There is no meaningful difference between the quality and gains of the program and the causes of the enrollment in the program in terms of gender, marital status, workplace, age, current status and length of work. 5- The most advantageous feature of the program is that there is no time and place limitation. The most disadvantageous feature is that the program is superficial and it does not give a chance to face-to-face interaction. 6- The participants’ views on the expectation and satisfaction level are the increase of educational qualification and gaining more than the expectations. 7- The contributions of the program to the participants are the increase of teaching profession and the increase of the interest to the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信