经合组织国家的经验与教育和技能回报:雇主学习的证据?

Stijn Broecke
{"title":"经合组织国家的经验与教育和技能回报:雇主学习的证据?","authors":"Stijn Broecke","doi":"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2015-5JRS3SQRVZG5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC), this paper documents how the returns to education and skill change with experience for a sample of 22 OECD countries. It does this within the framework of the Altonji and Pierret (2001) employer learning model, and therefore also tests the relevance of this theory in a wide range of countries using comparable data and a consistent methodology. Significant heterogeneity is found in the experience profiles of the returns to education and skill across countries, and convincing evidence in support of the employer learning theory is only found in a sub-set of the countries analysed. While these countries vary significantly from one another in terms of their labour market institutions and educational systems, the analysis does seem to suggest that employer learning is most common in those countries where employment protection legislation on temporary contracts is weak. This is consistent with a model in which temporary contracts allow employers to test and learn about young workers, and give them the flexibility to adjust wages in line with observed productivity.JEL codes: J24, J32, D83 Keywords: Employer learning, returns to education, returns to skill","PeriodicalId":416490,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience and the returns to education and skill in OECD countries: Evidence of employer learning?\",\"authors\":\"Stijn Broecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2015-5JRS3SQRVZG5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC), this paper documents how the returns to education and skill change with experience for a sample of 22 OECD countries. It does this within the framework of the Altonji and Pierret (2001) employer learning model, and therefore also tests the relevance of this theory in a wide range of countries using comparable data and a consistent methodology. Significant heterogeneity is found in the experience profiles of the returns to education and skill across countries, and convincing evidence in support of the employer learning theory is only found in a sub-set of the countries analysed. While these countries vary significantly from one another in terms of their labour market institutions and educational systems, the analysis does seem to suggest that employer learning is most common in those countries where employment protection legislation on temporary contracts is weak. This is consistent with a model in which temporary contracts allow employers to test and learn about young workers, and give them the flexibility to adjust wages in line with observed productivity.JEL codes: J24, J32, D83 Keywords: Employer learning, returns to education, returns to skill\",\"PeriodicalId\":416490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2015-5JRS3SQRVZG5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2015-5JRS3SQRVZG5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

利用成人技能调查(PIAAC),本文记录了22个经合组织国家的教育和技能回报如何随经验变化。它在Altonji和Pierret(2001)雇主学习模型的框架内做到了这一点,因此也使用可比数据和一致的方法在广泛的国家中测试了这一理论的相关性。在各国教育和技能回报的经验档案中发现了显著的异质性,支持雇主学习理论的令人信服的证据只在分析的国家的一个子集中找到。虽然这些国家在劳动力市场制度和教育制度方面彼此差别很大,但分析似乎确实表明,雇主学习在临时合同就业保护立法薄弱的国家最为普遍。这与一种模式是一致的,在这种模式下,临时合同允许雇主测试和了解年轻工人,并赋予他们根据观察到的生产率调整工资的灵活性。关键词:雇主学习,教育回报,技能回报
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience and the returns to education and skill in OECD countries: Evidence of employer learning?
Using the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC), this paper documents how the returns to education and skill change with experience for a sample of 22 OECD countries. It does this within the framework of the Altonji and Pierret (2001) employer learning model, and therefore also tests the relevance of this theory in a wide range of countries using comparable data and a consistent methodology. Significant heterogeneity is found in the experience profiles of the returns to education and skill across countries, and convincing evidence in support of the employer learning theory is only found in a sub-set of the countries analysed. While these countries vary significantly from one another in terms of their labour market institutions and educational systems, the analysis does seem to suggest that employer learning is most common in those countries where employment protection legislation on temporary contracts is weak. This is consistent with a model in which temporary contracts allow employers to test and learn about young workers, and give them the flexibility to adjust wages in line with observed productivity.JEL codes: J24, J32, D83 Keywords: Employer learning, returns to education, returns to skill
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信