地方政府横行?国家官员考虑地方优先购买权的指南

Adam A. Millsap, Michael D. Farren
{"title":"地方政府横行?国家官员考虑地方优先购买权的指南","authors":"Adam A. Millsap, Michael D. Farren","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3126804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Mississippi laws preempting local control of minimum wages and Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) reasserted the authority of state government to overrule local regulations. This raises the question: What circumstances should motivate the use of state authority to interfere with local rule-making? This chapter will provide a framework to guide state officials who are considering local preemption. We will use this framework to analyze four issues that are relevant in Mississippi: 1. The sharing economy; 2. Labor market regulations; 3. Land use regulations; and 4. Tax and expenditure limits. We conclude that state preemption is warranted in situations where local governments enact non-general policies interfering with free exchange via price controls or similar restrictions.","PeriodicalId":381915,"journal":{"name":"TransportRN: Transportation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Governments Run Amok? A Guide for State Officials Considering Local Preemption\",\"authors\":\"Adam A. Millsap, Michael D. Farren\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3126804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Mississippi laws preempting local control of minimum wages and Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) reasserted the authority of state government to overrule local regulations. This raises the question: What circumstances should motivate the use of state authority to interfere with local rule-making? This chapter will provide a framework to guide state officials who are considering local preemption. We will use this framework to analyze four issues that are relevant in Mississippi: 1. The sharing economy; 2. Labor market regulations; 3. Land use regulations; and 4. Tax and expenditure limits. We conclude that state preemption is warranted in situations where local governments enact non-general policies interfering with free exchange via price controls or similar restrictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TransportRN: Transportation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TransportRN: Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3126804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TransportRN: Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3126804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

密西西比州的法律优先于地方对最低工资和运输网络公司(TNCs)的控制,重申了州政府推翻地方法规的权威。这就提出了一个问题:在什么情况下应该促使使用国家权力来干预地方法规的制定?本章将提供一个框架来指导正在考虑地方优先购买权的州官员。我们将使用这个框架来分析与密西西比州相关的四个问题:1。共享经济;2. 劳动力市场监管;3.土地使用条例;和4。税收和支出限制。我们的结论是,在地方政府通过价格控制或类似限制制定非一般性政策干扰自由交换的情况下,国家优先购买权是有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local Governments Run Amok? A Guide for State Officials Considering Local Preemption
The Mississippi laws preempting local control of minimum wages and Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) reasserted the authority of state government to overrule local regulations. This raises the question: What circumstances should motivate the use of state authority to interfere with local rule-making? This chapter will provide a framework to guide state officials who are considering local preemption. We will use this framework to analyze four issues that are relevant in Mississippi: 1. The sharing economy; 2. Labor market regulations; 3. Land use regulations; and 4. Tax and expenditure limits. We conclude that state preemption is warranted in situations where local governments enact non-general policies interfering with free exchange via price controls or similar restrictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信