{"title":"热氧化速率对SiC的传导型依赖性(0001)","authors":"Takuma Kobayashi, J. Suda, T. Kimoto","doi":"10.1109/IMFEDK.2014.6867060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conduction-type dependent thermal oxidation rate in SiC was discovered. The oxidation was performed for SiC(0001) with nitrogen doping (n-type) in the range from 2.0×10<sup>16</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> to 1.0×10<sup>19</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup>, and aluminum doping (p-type) in the range from 2.0×10<sup>15</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> to 1.0×10<sup>19</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup>, exhibiting a clear dependence. For n-type SiC the oxide thickness increases for higher doping density, and for p-type the thickness decreases. Note that in the case of Si oxidation, there exists very little difference of oxidation rate between the conduction types in such low doping density, and the dependence is peculiar to SiC. The authors speculate the difference originates from the difference in carrier (electron/hole) density during the oxidation, which can reasonably explain the difference in the oxidation rate between Si and SiC.","PeriodicalId":202416,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Meeting for Future of Electron Devices, Kansai (IMFEDK)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conduction-type dependence of thermal oxidation rate on SiC(0001)\",\"authors\":\"Takuma Kobayashi, J. Suda, T. Kimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMFEDK.2014.6867060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conduction-type dependent thermal oxidation rate in SiC was discovered. The oxidation was performed for SiC(0001) with nitrogen doping (n-type) in the range from 2.0×10<sup>16</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> to 1.0×10<sup>19</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup>, and aluminum doping (p-type) in the range from 2.0×10<sup>15</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> to 1.0×10<sup>19</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup>, exhibiting a clear dependence. For n-type SiC the oxide thickness increases for higher doping density, and for p-type the thickness decreases. Note that in the case of Si oxidation, there exists very little difference of oxidation rate between the conduction types in such low doping density, and the dependence is peculiar to SiC. The authors speculate the difference originates from the difference in carrier (electron/hole) density during the oxidation, which can reasonably explain the difference in the oxidation rate between Si and SiC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Meeting for Future of Electron Devices, Kansai (IMFEDK)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Meeting for Future of Electron Devices, Kansai (IMFEDK)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMFEDK.2014.6867060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Meeting for Future of Electron Devices, Kansai (IMFEDK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMFEDK.2014.6867060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conduction-type dependence of thermal oxidation rate on SiC(0001)
The conduction-type dependent thermal oxidation rate in SiC was discovered. The oxidation was performed for SiC(0001) with nitrogen doping (n-type) in the range from 2.0×1016 cm-3 to 1.0×1019 cm-3, and aluminum doping (p-type) in the range from 2.0×1015 cm-3 to 1.0×1019 cm-3, exhibiting a clear dependence. For n-type SiC the oxide thickness increases for higher doping density, and for p-type the thickness decreases. Note that in the case of Si oxidation, there exists very little difference of oxidation rate between the conduction types in such low doping density, and the dependence is peculiar to SiC. The authors speculate the difference originates from the difference in carrier (electron/hole) density during the oxidation, which can reasonably explain the difference in the oxidation rate between Si and SiC.