基于外围生理信号的端到端情绪识别

M. Pidgeon, N. Kanwal, N. Murray, M. Asghar
{"title":"基于外围生理信号的端到端情绪识别","authors":"M. Pidgeon, N. Kanwal, N. Murray, M. Asghar","doi":"10.14236/ewic/hci2022.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of emotion recognition from physiological signals has seen a huge growth in recent decades. Studies initially used traditional machine learning classification to estimate either discrete emotions or combinations of arousal and valence. However, different feature engineering techniques such as Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) Analysis for electroencephalography (EEG) signals and statistical calculations for peripheral signals are used prior to machine learning. Also, several sensors needed to be worn by participants to predict the emotions. This study aims to investigate whether arousal and valence can be predicted from a single peripheral signal using deep learning. The Galvanic Skin Response(GSR), Respiration (RSP), Blood Volume Pulse (BVP) and Temperature (Temp) signals from the DEAP dataset are used. The signals are downsampled to approximately three hertz (Hz) and input to a convolutional network (CNN) to predict arousal and valence. GSR, RSP and BVP had similar F1 and accuracy results. BVP had an F1 result of 0.673 and 0.632 and accuracies of 63.5% and 61.1% respectively for arousal and valence. RSP’s F1 results were 0.677 and 0.669 and accuracies were 61.3% and 64.2% for arousal and valence respectively. GSR had F1 results of 0.699 and 0.663 and accuracies of 62.5% and 60.2% respectively for arousal and valence. Using raw signals and examining the peripheral signals individually, we were able to identify which sensors showed the best potential for further research to bring emotion classification into a real-world scenario using non-invasive sensors.","PeriodicalId":413003,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Workshops in Computing","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-to-End Emotion Recognition using Peripheral Physiological Signals\",\"authors\":\"M. Pidgeon, N. Kanwal, N. Murray, M. Asghar\",\"doi\":\"10.14236/ewic/hci2022.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of emotion recognition from physiological signals has seen a huge growth in recent decades. Studies initially used traditional machine learning classification to estimate either discrete emotions or combinations of arousal and valence. However, different feature engineering techniques such as Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) Analysis for electroencephalography (EEG) signals and statistical calculations for peripheral signals are used prior to machine learning. Also, several sensors needed to be worn by participants to predict the emotions. This study aims to investigate whether arousal and valence can be predicted from a single peripheral signal using deep learning. The Galvanic Skin Response(GSR), Respiration (RSP), Blood Volume Pulse (BVP) and Temperature (Temp) signals from the DEAP dataset are used. The signals are downsampled to approximately three hertz (Hz) and input to a convolutional network (CNN) to predict arousal and valence. GSR, RSP and BVP had similar F1 and accuracy results. BVP had an F1 result of 0.673 and 0.632 and accuracies of 63.5% and 61.1% respectively for arousal and valence. RSP’s F1 results were 0.677 and 0.669 and accuracies were 61.3% and 64.2% for arousal and valence respectively. GSR had F1 results of 0.699 and 0.663 and accuracies of 62.5% and 60.2% respectively for arousal and valence. Using raw signals and examining the peripheral signals individually, we were able to identify which sensors showed the best potential for further research to bring emotion classification into a real-world scenario using non-invasive sensors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Workshops in Computing\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Workshops in Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2022.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Workshops in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2022.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,从生理信号中识别情绪的研究取得了巨大的发展。研究最初使用传统的机器学习分类来估计离散的情绪或唤醒和效价的组合。然而,不同的特征工程技术,如脑电图(EEG)信号的集成经验模式分解(EEMD)分析和外围信号的统计计算,在机器学习之前被使用。此外,参与者需要佩戴几个传感器来预测情绪。本研究旨在探讨是否可以使用深度学习从单个外周信号预测唤醒和效价。使用来自DEAP数据集的皮肤电反应(GSR)、呼吸(RSP)、血容量脉冲(BVP)和温度(Temp)信号。信号被降采样到大约3赫兹(Hz),并输入到卷积网络(CNN)来预测唤醒和价态。GSR、RSP和BVP具有相似的F1和准确度结果。BVP对唤醒和效价的F1值分别为0.673和0.632,准确率分别为63.5%和61.1%。RSP的F1结果分别为0.677和0.669,唤醒和效价的准确率分别为61.3%和64.2%。GSR对唤醒和效价的F1值分别为0.699和0.663,准确率分别为62.5%和60.2%。通过使用原始信号和单独检查外围信号,我们能够确定哪些传感器显示出最佳的进一步研究潜力,从而使用非侵入性传感器将情感分类带入现实世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
End-to-End Emotion Recognition using Peripheral Physiological Signals
The study of emotion recognition from physiological signals has seen a huge growth in recent decades. Studies initially used traditional machine learning classification to estimate either discrete emotions or combinations of arousal and valence. However, different feature engineering techniques such as Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) Analysis for electroencephalography (EEG) signals and statistical calculations for peripheral signals are used prior to machine learning. Also, several sensors needed to be worn by participants to predict the emotions. This study aims to investigate whether arousal and valence can be predicted from a single peripheral signal using deep learning. The Galvanic Skin Response(GSR), Respiration (RSP), Blood Volume Pulse (BVP) and Temperature (Temp) signals from the DEAP dataset are used. The signals are downsampled to approximately three hertz (Hz) and input to a convolutional network (CNN) to predict arousal and valence. GSR, RSP and BVP had similar F1 and accuracy results. BVP had an F1 result of 0.673 and 0.632 and accuracies of 63.5% and 61.1% respectively for arousal and valence. RSP’s F1 results were 0.677 and 0.669 and accuracies were 61.3% and 64.2% for arousal and valence respectively. GSR had F1 results of 0.699 and 0.663 and accuracies of 62.5% and 60.2% respectively for arousal and valence. Using raw signals and examining the peripheral signals individually, we were able to identify which sensors showed the best potential for further research to bring emotion classification into a real-world scenario using non-invasive sensors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信