巴塞尔协议下指定2B股权证券的市场流动性:来自南非商业银行的经验证据

Samuel Tabot Enow, S. Kasse, J. Dubihlela
{"title":"巴塞尔协议下指定2B股权证券的市场流动性:来自南非商业银行的经验证据","authors":"Samuel Tabot Enow, S. Kasse, J. Dubihlela","doi":"10.32602/jafas.2023.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The financial market liquidity of an asset has always been an important concept in banking and financial markets because it keeps leveraging in check. The objective of this study was to investigate the market liquidity of the level 2B common equity in the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Fund Ratio. Market liquidity measures where modelled and tested empirically to validate whether the LCR and NSFR needs to be improved.\nMethodology: This study used a sample period from May 2016 – May 2021, and a fixed effect model to investigate the market liquidity of the selected level 2B High Quality Liquid Assets.\nFindings: The findings of this study indicates that the common equity securities that qualifies to be included in level 2B HQLA category lack market depth. This was evident in the significant relationship between the independent and dependent variables used in this study although there was no significant relationship between transaction cost and price effect. Therefore, there was sufficient evidence that the LCR and NSFR measures for liquidity management in the banking sector needs to be improved. \nOriginality/Value: An improved LCR and NSFR was suggested in addition to a specialist system in order to capture the volatility of the level 2B equity securities and improve the market liquidity of these assets. As per the author’s knowledge, this study is the first study to empirically investigate the liquidity of the selected level 2B HQLAs.\n","PeriodicalId":366129,"journal":{"name":"journal of accounting finance and auditing studies (JAFAS)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Market Liquidity Of Designated 2B Equity Securities Under The Basel Accord: Empirical Evidence From South African Commercial Banks\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Tabot Enow, S. Kasse, J. Dubihlela\",\"doi\":\"10.32602/jafas.2023.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The financial market liquidity of an asset has always been an important concept in banking and financial markets because it keeps leveraging in check. The objective of this study was to investigate the market liquidity of the level 2B common equity in the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Fund Ratio. Market liquidity measures where modelled and tested empirically to validate whether the LCR and NSFR needs to be improved.\\nMethodology: This study used a sample period from May 2016 – May 2021, and a fixed effect model to investigate the market liquidity of the selected level 2B High Quality Liquid Assets.\\nFindings: The findings of this study indicates that the common equity securities that qualifies to be included in level 2B HQLA category lack market depth. This was evident in the significant relationship between the independent and dependent variables used in this study although there was no significant relationship between transaction cost and price effect. Therefore, there was sufficient evidence that the LCR and NSFR measures for liquidity management in the banking sector needs to be improved. \\nOriginality/Value: An improved LCR and NSFR was suggested in addition to a specialist system in order to capture the volatility of the level 2B equity securities and improve the market liquidity of these assets. As per the author’s knowledge, this study is the first study to empirically investigate the liquidity of the selected level 2B HQLAs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":366129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"journal of accounting finance and auditing studies (JAFAS)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"journal of accounting finance and auditing studies (JAFAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2023.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of accounting finance and auditing studies (JAFAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2023.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:资产的金融市场流动性一直是银行和金融市场的一个重要概念,因为它可以控制杠杆。本研究的目的是考察流动性覆盖率和净稳定基金比率中2B级普通股的市场流动性。对市场流动性措施进行了建模和实证检验,以验证LCR和NSFR是否需要改进。方法:本研究采用2016年5月至2021年5月为样本期,采用固定效应模型对所选2B级优质流动资产的市场流动性进行考察。研究结果:本研究发现,符合2B级HQLA类别的普通股证券缺乏市场深度。这在本研究中使用的自变量和因变量之间的显著关系中是显而易见的,尽管交易成本和价格效应之间没有显著的关系。因此,有足够的证据表明,银行业流动性管理的LCR和NSFR措施需要改进。原创性/价值:除了专家系统之外,还建议改进LCR和NSFR,以捕捉2B级股权证券的波动性,并改善这些资产的市场流动性。据笔者所知,本研究是第一个对选定的2B级hqla的流动性进行实证研究的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Market Liquidity Of Designated 2B Equity Securities Under The Basel Accord: Empirical Evidence From South African Commercial Banks
Purpose: The financial market liquidity of an asset has always been an important concept in banking and financial markets because it keeps leveraging in check. The objective of this study was to investigate the market liquidity of the level 2B common equity in the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Fund Ratio. Market liquidity measures where modelled and tested empirically to validate whether the LCR and NSFR needs to be improved. Methodology: This study used a sample period from May 2016 – May 2021, and a fixed effect model to investigate the market liquidity of the selected level 2B High Quality Liquid Assets. Findings: The findings of this study indicates that the common equity securities that qualifies to be included in level 2B HQLA category lack market depth. This was evident in the significant relationship between the independent and dependent variables used in this study although there was no significant relationship between transaction cost and price effect. Therefore, there was sufficient evidence that the LCR and NSFR measures for liquidity management in the banking sector needs to be improved. Originality/Value: An improved LCR and NSFR was suggested in addition to a specialist system in order to capture the volatility of the level 2B equity securities and improve the market liquidity of these assets. As per the author’s knowledge, this study is the first study to empirically investigate the liquidity of the selected level 2B HQLAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信