清洁能源创新融资中的风险投资:来自2005-2014年美国市场的洞察

V. Rai, Erik Funkhouser, Trevor C Udwin, D. Livingston
{"title":"清洁能源创新融资中的风险投资:来自2005-2014年美国市场的洞察","authors":"V. Rai, Erik Funkhouser, Trevor C Udwin, D. Livingston","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2676216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since emerging as a capital destination in the late 1990s, the experience of venture capital (VC) in clean energy technologies (CET) has been checkered. Haphazard investment activity in the early 2000s paired with high-profile failures of once-promising CET ventures to produce a general reticence toward CETs in the investment community. Since then, attitudes regarding the potential for financial venture capital or public policy to meaningfully reintroduce vigor in CET innovation have been characterized by skepticism, in no small part due to notions of capital intensity and policy risk formed during the initial waves of CET investment. Despite its importance, there has been little systematic research of CETs vis-a-vis venture capital, public policy, or the broader investment system. In this paper we revisit this area of inquiry, focusing on the role of venture capital in funding innovation in clean energy, especially in light of the lessons learned over the past decade in the U.S. The core data for our analysis comes from a series of in-depth, semi-structured expert interviews with individuals from venture capital firms, relevant public agencies, corporate venture capital entities, as well as for-profit and not-for-profit investment houses, all of whom were active in the CET space before, during, and after the peak of CET in the late 2000s. We reevaluate common notions regarding the drivers and barriers of VC and strategic corporate investment in CETs and uncover several nuanced insights that inform approaches for addressing barriers to unlocking the full potential of VC in funding clean energy innovation.","PeriodicalId":338013,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venture Capital in Clean Energy Innovation Finance: Insights from the U.S. Market during 2005-2014\",\"authors\":\"V. Rai, Erik Funkhouser, Trevor C Udwin, D. Livingston\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2676216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since emerging as a capital destination in the late 1990s, the experience of venture capital (VC) in clean energy technologies (CET) has been checkered. Haphazard investment activity in the early 2000s paired with high-profile failures of once-promising CET ventures to produce a general reticence toward CETs in the investment community. Since then, attitudes regarding the potential for financial venture capital or public policy to meaningfully reintroduce vigor in CET innovation have been characterized by skepticism, in no small part due to notions of capital intensity and policy risk formed during the initial waves of CET investment. Despite its importance, there has been little systematic research of CETs vis-a-vis venture capital, public policy, or the broader investment system. In this paper we revisit this area of inquiry, focusing on the role of venture capital in funding innovation in clean energy, especially in light of the lessons learned over the past decade in the U.S. The core data for our analysis comes from a series of in-depth, semi-structured expert interviews with individuals from venture capital firms, relevant public agencies, corporate venture capital entities, as well as for-profit and not-for-profit investment houses, all of whom were active in the CET space before, during, and after the peak of CET in the late 2000s. We reevaluate common notions regarding the drivers and barriers of VC and strategic corporate investment in CETs and uncover several nuanced insights that inform approaches for addressing barriers to unlocking the full potential of VC in funding clean energy innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Innovation (Economic) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

自20世纪90年代末作为资本目的地出现以来,风险投资(VC)在清洁能源技术(CET)领域的经验一直是曲折的。21世纪初的偶然投资活动,加上曾经前景光明的CET项目高调失败,导致投资界对CET普遍保持沉默。从那时起,对于金融风险投资或公共政策有意地重新引入科技创新活力的潜力,人们的态度一直以怀疑为特征,这在很大程度上是由于在科技投资的最初浪潮中形成的资本强度和政策风险的概念。尽管CETs很重要,但很少有系统的研究将其与风险资本、公共政策或更广泛的投资体系相比较。在本文中,我们重新审视了这一调查领域,重点关注风险资本在资助清洁能源创新方面的作用,特别是根据过去十年在美国吸取的经验教训。我们分析的核心数据来自于对风险投资公司、相关公共机构、企业风险投资实体以及营利性和非营利性投资机构的个人进行的一系列深入、半结构化的专家访谈。他们都在2000年代后期CET高峰之前、期间和之后活跃于CET空间。我们重新评估了风险投资和企业战略投资在清洁能源领域的驱动因素和障碍,并揭示了一些细微的见解,为解决风险投资在清洁能源创新融资中释放全部潜力的障碍提供了方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Venture Capital in Clean Energy Innovation Finance: Insights from the U.S. Market during 2005-2014
Since emerging as a capital destination in the late 1990s, the experience of venture capital (VC) in clean energy technologies (CET) has been checkered. Haphazard investment activity in the early 2000s paired with high-profile failures of once-promising CET ventures to produce a general reticence toward CETs in the investment community. Since then, attitudes regarding the potential for financial venture capital or public policy to meaningfully reintroduce vigor in CET innovation have been characterized by skepticism, in no small part due to notions of capital intensity and policy risk formed during the initial waves of CET investment. Despite its importance, there has been little systematic research of CETs vis-a-vis venture capital, public policy, or the broader investment system. In this paper we revisit this area of inquiry, focusing on the role of venture capital in funding innovation in clean energy, especially in light of the lessons learned over the past decade in the U.S. The core data for our analysis comes from a series of in-depth, semi-structured expert interviews with individuals from venture capital firms, relevant public agencies, corporate venture capital entities, as well as for-profit and not-for-profit investment houses, all of whom were active in the CET space before, during, and after the peak of CET in the late 2000s. We reevaluate common notions regarding the drivers and barriers of VC and strategic corporate investment in CETs and uncover several nuanced insights that inform approaches for addressing barriers to unlocking the full potential of VC in funding clean energy innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信