基于惯性和磁测量单元的三种手部姿态重建算法的比较

P. J. Kieliba, P. Veltink, T. L. Baldi, D. Prattichizzo, G. Santaera, A. Bicchi, M. Bianchi, B. Beijnum
{"title":"基于惯性和磁测量单元的三种手部姿态重建算法的比较","authors":"P. J. Kieliba, P. Veltink, T. L. Baldi, D. Prattichizzo, G. Santaera, A. Bicchi, M. Bianchi, B. Beijnum","doi":"10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2018.8624929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The correct estimation of human hand kinematics has received a lot of attention in many research fields of neuroscience and robotics. Not surprisingly, many works have addressed hand pose reconstruction (HPR) problem and several technological solutions have been proposed. Among them, Inertial and Magnetic Measurement Unit (IMMU) based systems offer some elegant characteristics (including cost-effectiveness) that make these especially suited for wearable and ambulatory HPR. However, what still lacks is an exhaustive characterization of IMMU-based orientation tracking algorithms performance for hand tracking purposes. In this work, we have developed an experimental protocol to compare the performance of three of the most widely adopted HPR computational techniques, i.e. extended Kalman filter (EKF), Gauss-Newton with Complementary filter (CF) and Madgwick filter (MF), on the same dataset acquired through an IMMU-based sensing glove. The quality of the algorithms has been benchmarked against the ground truth measurement provided by an optical motion tracking system. Results suggest that performance of the three algorithms is similar, though the MF algorithm appears to be slightly more accurate in reconstructing the individual joint angles during static trials and to be the fastest one to run.","PeriodicalId":433345,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Three Hand Pose Reconstruction Algorithms Using Inertial and Magnetic Measurement Units\",\"authors\":\"P. J. Kieliba, P. Veltink, T. L. Baldi, D. Prattichizzo, G. Santaera, A. Bicchi, M. Bianchi, B. Beijnum\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2018.8624929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The correct estimation of human hand kinematics has received a lot of attention in many research fields of neuroscience and robotics. Not surprisingly, many works have addressed hand pose reconstruction (HPR) problem and several technological solutions have been proposed. Among them, Inertial and Magnetic Measurement Unit (IMMU) based systems offer some elegant characteristics (including cost-effectiveness) that make these especially suited for wearable and ambulatory HPR. However, what still lacks is an exhaustive characterization of IMMU-based orientation tracking algorithms performance for hand tracking purposes. In this work, we have developed an experimental protocol to compare the performance of three of the most widely adopted HPR computational techniques, i.e. extended Kalman filter (EKF), Gauss-Newton with Complementary filter (CF) and Madgwick filter (MF), on the same dataset acquired through an IMMU-based sensing glove. The quality of the algorithms has been benchmarked against the ground truth measurement provided by an optical motion tracking system. Results suggest that performance of the three algorithms is similar, though the MF algorithm appears to be slightly more accurate in reconstructing the individual joint angles during static trials and to be the fastest one to run.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2018.8624929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2018.8624929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

手部运动学的正确估计在神经科学和机器人技术的许多研究领域受到广泛关注。不出所料,许多研究已经解决了手部姿态重建问题,并提出了几种技术解决方案。其中,基于惯性和磁测量单元(IMMU)的系统提供了一些优雅的特性(包括成本效益),使其特别适合可穿戴和动态HPR。然而,仍然缺乏的是一个详尽的表征基于immu的方向跟踪算法的性能为手部跟踪的目的。在这项工作中,我们开发了一个实验方案来比较三种最广泛采用的HPR计算技术的性能,即扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF),高斯-牛顿与互补滤波器(CF)和Madgwick滤波器(MF),通过基于immu的传感手套获得相同的数据集。通过光学运动跟踪系统提供的地面真值测量,对算法的质量进行了基准测试。结果表明,这三种算法的性能相似,尽管MF算法在静态试验中重建单个关节角度时似乎更准确,并且是运行最快的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Three Hand Pose Reconstruction Algorithms Using Inertial and Magnetic Measurement Units
The correct estimation of human hand kinematics has received a lot of attention in many research fields of neuroscience and robotics. Not surprisingly, many works have addressed hand pose reconstruction (HPR) problem and several technological solutions have been proposed. Among them, Inertial and Magnetic Measurement Unit (IMMU) based systems offer some elegant characteristics (including cost-effectiveness) that make these especially suited for wearable and ambulatory HPR. However, what still lacks is an exhaustive characterization of IMMU-based orientation tracking algorithms performance for hand tracking purposes. In this work, we have developed an experimental protocol to compare the performance of three of the most widely adopted HPR computational techniques, i.e. extended Kalman filter (EKF), Gauss-Newton with Complementary filter (CF) and Madgwick filter (MF), on the same dataset acquired through an IMMU-based sensing glove. The quality of the algorithms has been benchmarked against the ground truth measurement provided by an optical motion tracking system. Results suggest that performance of the three algorithms is similar, though the MF algorithm appears to be slightly more accurate in reconstructing the individual joint angles during static trials and to be the fastest one to run.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信