VANETS中不同信道负载下CSMA与自组织TDMA的稳定时间比较

A. Alonso, C. Mecklenbräuker
{"title":"VANETS中不同信道负载下CSMA与自组织TDMA的稳定时间比较","authors":"A. Alonso, C. Mecklenbräuker","doi":"10.1109/ITST.2012.6425187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traffic safety-related messages have to meet low and predictable delay constraints. For vehicles using IEEE802.11p medium access control (MAC) algorithm the channel access delay increases unpredictably (using random backoff time) every time the channel is sensed busy. In contrast, Self-Organizing Time Division Multiple Access (STDMA) provides an upper bound on channel access delay defined by the selection interval (SI) length. Our contribution studies the performance of both protocols during the start-up phase of the vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET). Results show MAC-to-MAC delay of each correctly decoded packet for lightly-loaded and heavily-loaded scenarios. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of these measurements for a maximum observable MAC-to-MAC delay value of 100ms for different vehicle densities show that both MAC algorithms perform reliably (above 90%) within 60s simulation. We define stabilization time as the time instant from which on the MAC protocol reaches a reliable performance. For lightly-loaded scenarios with 25 vehicles within range, STDMA and the IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm have a stabilization time of 1s and 20ms, respectively. For heavily-loaded scenarios with 400 vehicles within range, STDMA and the IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm have a stabilization time of 1s and 3.2s. In conclusion, STDMA shows a reliable performance and better predictability, regardless of the number of vehicles accessing the channel, and it also provides lower stabilization time in comparison to IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm for vehicle densities higher than 350 vehicles sending periodic messages every 500ms.","PeriodicalId":143706,"journal":{"name":"2012 12th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stabilization time comparison of CSMA and Self-Organizing TDMA for different channel loads in VANETS\",\"authors\":\"A. Alonso, C. Mecklenbräuker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITST.2012.6425187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traffic safety-related messages have to meet low and predictable delay constraints. For vehicles using IEEE802.11p medium access control (MAC) algorithm the channel access delay increases unpredictably (using random backoff time) every time the channel is sensed busy. In contrast, Self-Organizing Time Division Multiple Access (STDMA) provides an upper bound on channel access delay defined by the selection interval (SI) length. Our contribution studies the performance of both protocols during the start-up phase of the vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET). Results show MAC-to-MAC delay of each correctly decoded packet for lightly-loaded and heavily-loaded scenarios. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of these measurements for a maximum observable MAC-to-MAC delay value of 100ms for different vehicle densities show that both MAC algorithms perform reliably (above 90%) within 60s simulation. We define stabilization time as the time instant from which on the MAC protocol reaches a reliable performance. For lightly-loaded scenarios with 25 vehicles within range, STDMA and the IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm have a stabilization time of 1s and 20ms, respectively. For heavily-loaded scenarios with 400 vehicles within range, STDMA and the IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm have a stabilization time of 1s and 3.2s. In conclusion, STDMA shows a reliable performance and better predictability, regardless of the number of vehicles accessing the channel, and it also provides lower stabilization time in comparison to IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm for vehicle densities higher than 350 vehicles sending periodic messages every 500ms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 12th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 12th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2012.6425187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 12th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2012.6425187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

与交通安全相关的信息必须满足低且可预测的延迟约束。对于使用IEEE802.11p介质访问控制(MAC)算法的车辆,每次感知信道繁忙时,信道访问延迟都会不可预测地增加(使用随机后退时间)。相比之下,自组织时分多址(STDMA)提供了由选择间隔(SI)长度定义的信道访问延迟的上界。我们的贡献研究了两种协议在车辆自组织网络(VANET)启动阶段的性能。结果显示了轻负载和重负载场景下每个正确解码数据包的mac到mac延迟。在不同车辆密度下,最大可观察到的MAC- MAC延迟值为100ms,这些测量的累积分布函数(CDF)表明,两种MAC算法在60秒的模拟内都能可靠地执行(90%以上)。我们将稳定时间定义为MAC协议达到可靠性能的时间瞬间。对于范围内有25辆车的轻负载场景,STDMA和IEEE802.11p MAC算法的稳定时间分别为1s和20ms。对于400辆车的重载场景,STDMA和IEEE802.11p MAC算法的稳定时间分别为15秒和3.2秒。综上所述,无论接入信道的车辆数量如何,STDMA都表现出可靠的性能和更好的可预测性,并且在车辆密度大于350辆的情况下,与IEEE802.11p MAC算法相比,STDMA提供了更短的稳定时间,每500ms发送周期性消息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stabilization time comparison of CSMA and Self-Organizing TDMA for different channel loads in VANETS
Traffic safety-related messages have to meet low and predictable delay constraints. For vehicles using IEEE802.11p medium access control (MAC) algorithm the channel access delay increases unpredictably (using random backoff time) every time the channel is sensed busy. In contrast, Self-Organizing Time Division Multiple Access (STDMA) provides an upper bound on channel access delay defined by the selection interval (SI) length. Our contribution studies the performance of both protocols during the start-up phase of the vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET). Results show MAC-to-MAC delay of each correctly decoded packet for lightly-loaded and heavily-loaded scenarios. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of these measurements for a maximum observable MAC-to-MAC delay value of 100ms for different vehicle densities show that both MAC algorithms perform reliably (above 90%) within 60s simulation. We define stabilization time as the time instant from which on the MAC protocol reaches a reliable performance. For lightly-loaded scenarios with 25 vehicles within range, STDMA and the IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm have a stabilization time of 1s and 20ms, respectively. For heavily-loaded scenarios with 400 vehicles within range, STDMA and the IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm have a stabilization time of 1s and 3.2s. In conclusion, STDMA shows a reliable performance and better predictability, regardless of the number of vehicles accessing the channel, and it also provides lower stabilization time in comparison to IEEE802.11p MAC algorithm for vehicle densities higher than 350 vehicles sending periodic messages every 500ms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信