Iman Hosseini, Mohammed N. Najafi Ashtiani, F. Bahrpeyma
{"title":"西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分与膝关节骨关节炎患者稳定性指标的相关性","authors":"Iman Hosseini, Mohammed N. Najafi Ashtiani, F. Bahrpeyma","doi":"10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to assess the correlation between the stability metrics related to the center of pressure excursion measurements and the WOMAC questionnaire scores. Method and Materials: Fourteen patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis and fourteen age-matched individuals were participated to stand with open and closed eyes, and on firm and rocking support on a force platform. The WOMAC questionnaire was obtained from the patient group. One-way ANOVA was utilized to determine the effects of knee osteoarthritis, vision, and support on postural stability metrics. Spearman’s correlation was also used to indicate the correlation between the stability metrics and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) sub scores. Findings: The anterior-posterior variability of the center of pressure was significantly greater in patients (2.7 mm, p=.003). Elimination of the visual feedback and the rocking support affected the sway area and the AP (p<.001), and the ML variability (p<.024). The pain subscore of the WOMAC questionnaire was negatively and strongly correlated to the AP total mean velocity (open-eyes: r=-.466, closed-eyes: r=-.779). The pain was positively and strongly correlated to the AP variability (open-eyes: r=.796, closed-eyes: r=.744). Patients with knee osteoarthritis showed more postural instabilities. Conclusion: The instability in the anterior-posterior was more eminent than in the lateral direction. The pain was the most role-playing factor in the destabilization of the posture among the patients with knee osteoarthritis but may be disregarded in physically-difficult conditions of standing.","PeriodicalId":122814,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between the Western Ontario and \\nMcMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) \\nScores and the Stability Metrics in Patients with Knee \\nOsteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"Iman Hosseini, Mohammed N. Najafi Ashtiani, F. Bahrpeyma\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the present study was to assess the correlation between the stability metrics related to the center of pressure excursion measurements and the WOMAC questionnaire scores. Method and Materials: Fourteen patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis and fourteen age-matched individuals were participated to stand with open and closed eyes, and on firm and rocking support on a force platform. The WOMAC questionnaire was obtained from the patient group. One-way ANOVA was utilized to determine the effects of knee osteoarthritis, vision, and support on postural stability metrics. Spearman’s correlation was also used to indicate the correlation between the stability metrics and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) sub scores. Findings: The anterior-posterior variability of the center of pressure was significantly greater in patients (2.7 mm, p=.003). Elimination of the visual feedback and the rocking support affected the sway area and the AP (p<.001), and the ML variability (p<.024). The pain subscore of the WOMAC questionnaire was negatively and strongly correlated to the AP total mean velocity (open-eyes: r=-.466, closed-eyes: r=-.779). The pain was positively and strongly correlated to the AP variability (open-eyes: r=.796, closed-eyes: r=.744). Patients with knee osteoarthritis showed more postural instabilities. Conclusion: The instability in the anterior-posterior was more eminent than in the lateral direction. The pain was the most role-playing factor in the destabilization of the posture among the patients with knee osteoarthritis but may be disregarded in physically-difficult conditions of standing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是评估与压力偏移中心测量相关的稳定性指标与WOMAC问卷得分之间的相关性。方法与材料:选取14例中度膝骨性关节炎患者和14例年龄相匹配的个体,分别在一个受力平台上以睁眼和闭眼站立,在坚固和摇晃的支撑下站立。WOMAC问卷从患者组中获取。采用单因素方差分析来确定膝关节骨关节炎、视力和支持对姿势稳定性指标的影响。Spearman相关也用于表明稳定性指标与西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)分值之间的相关性。结果:患者压力中心的前后变异性明显更大(2.7 mm, p= 0.003)。视觉反馈和摇摆支撑的消除影响了摇摆区域和AP (p< 0.001),以及ML变异性(p< 0.024)。WOMAC问卷疼痛分值与AP总平均速度(睁眼:r=-)呈显著负相关。466,闭上眼睛:r=- 0.779)。疼痛与AP变异性呈正相关(睁眼:r=。796,闭上眼睛:r=.744)。膝关节骨性关节炎患者表现出更多的姿势不稳定。结论:前后椎体失稳比外侧椎体失稳更明显。疼痛是膝关节骨性关节炎患者姿势不稳定的最重要因素,但在站立困难的情况下可能被忽视。
Correlation between the Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Scores and the Stability Metrics in Patients with Knee
Osteoarthritis
The aim of the present study was to assess the correlation between the stability metrics related to the center of pressure excursion measurements and the WOMAC questionnaire scores. Method and Materials: Fourteen patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis and fourteen age-matched individuals were participated to stand with open and closed eyes, and on firm and rocking support on a force platform. The WOMAC questionnaire was obtained from the patient group. One-way ANOVA was utilized to determine the effects of knee osteoarthritis, vision, and support on postural stability metrics. Spearman’s correlation was also used to indicate the correlation between the stability metrics and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) sub scores. Findings: The anterior-posterior variability of the center of pressure was significantly greater in patients (2.7 mm, p=.003). Elimination of the visual feedback and the rocking support affected the sway area and the AP (p<.001), and the ML variability (p<.024). The pain subscore of the WOMAC questionnaire was negatively and strongly correlated to the AP total mean velocity (open-eyes: r=-.466, closed-eyes: r=-.779). The pain was positively and strongly correlated to the AP variability (open-eyes: r=.796, closed-eyes: r=.744). Patients with knee osteoarthritis showed more postural instabilities. Conclusion: The instability in the anterior-posterior was more eminent than in the lateral direction. The pain was the most role-playing factor in the destabilization of the posture among the patients with knee osteoarthritis but may be disregarded in physically-difficult conditions of standing.