简·亚当斯和公共管理

P. Shields
{"title":"简·亚当斯和公共管理","authors":"P. Shields","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544518.013.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the progressive era, two models of public administration emerged in the United States. One, crafted by male reformers, was a reaction to corruption and inefficiencies of crony political hiring practices. Their goal was to separate politics and administration and uncover a science of administration. The second model, developed by settlement women, had a social justice reform agenda. These women, who themselves could not vote, advocated for children, women, and immigrants as they sought municipal (e.g., cleaner cities, playgrounds, juvenile justice) and industrial (e.g., safer workplaces, child labor laws) reform. Jane Addams led the effort and through her social democracy, social ethics, and feminist pragmatism provided a sound theoretical underpinning to the undertaking. The settlement model failed to receive recognition in the male-dominated field of public administration. In the early 2000s, public administration scholars rediscovered the buried settlement model, which contained two themes—municipal housekeeping and industrial citizenship. Of the two, industrial citizenship is less well articulated. This chapter describes industrial citizenship and Jane Addams’s role in its development.","PeriodicalId":191932,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jane Addams and Public Administration\",\"authors\":\"P. Shields\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544518.013.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the progressive era, two models of public administration emerged in the United States. One, crafted by male reformers, was a reaction to corruption and inefficiencies of crony political hiring practices. Their goal was to separate politics and administration and uncover a science of administration. The second model, developed by settlement women, had a social justice reform agenda. These women, who themselves could not vote, advocated for children, women, and immigrants as they sought municipal (e.g., cleaner cities, playgrounds, juvenile justice) and industrial (e.g., safer workplaces, child labor laws) reform. Jane Addams led the effort and through her social democracy, social ethics, and feminist pragmatism provided a sound theoretical underpinning to the undertaking. The settlement model failed to receive recognition in the male-dominated field of public administration. In the early 2000s, public administration scholars rediscovered the buried settlement model, which contained two themes—municipal housekeeping and industrial citizenship. Of the two, industrial citizenship is less well articulated. This chapter describes industrial citizenship and Jane Addams’s role in its development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544518.013.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544518.013.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在进步时代,美国出现了两种公共行政模式。一个是由男性改革者精心设计的,是对腐败和低效的裙带政治雇佣行为的反应。他们的目标是将政治与行政分开,揭示一门行政科学。第二种模式是由定居妇女制定的,有一项社会正义改革议程。这些妇女本身没有投票权,她们主张为儿童、妇女和移民争取市政(例如,更清洁的城市、游乐场、少年司法)和工业(例如,更安全的工作场所、童工法)改革。简·亚当斯领导了这一努力,并通过她的社会民主主义、社会伦理和女权主义实用主义为这项事业提供了坚实的理论基础。定居模式未能在男性主导的公共行政领域得到承认。在21世纪初,公共管理学者重新发现了埋藏的定居模式,它包含两个主题——市政管理和工业公民。在这两者中,工业公民没有得到很好的阐述。本章描述了工业公民和简·亚当斯在其发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jane Addams and Public Administration
During the progressive era, two models of public administration emerged in the United States. One, crafted by male reformers, was a reaction to corruption and inefficiencies of crony political hiring practices. Their goal was to separate politics and administration and uncover a science of administration. The second model, developed by settlement women, had a social justice reform agenda. These women, who themselves could not vote, advocated for children, women, and immigrants as they sought municipal (e.g., cleaner cities, playgrounds, juvenile justice) and industrial (e.g., safer workplaces, child labor laws) reform. Jane Addams led the effort and through her social democracy, social ethics, and feminist pragmatism provided a sound theoretical underpinning to the undertaking. The settlement model failed to receive recognition in the male-dominated field of public administration. In the early 2000s, public administration scholars rediscovered the buried settlement model, which contained two themes—municipal housekeeping and industrial citizenship. Of the two, industrial citizenship is less well articulated. This chapter describes industrial citizenship and Jane Addams’s role in its development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信