印度艾哈迈达巴德地区学校里坐在地板上的孩子的脊柱姿势

Megha Sheth, Nehal Paresh Shah, Yash Ahuja, Zishan Belim Khan, Parth Parmar, Priyasingh Bhagirath Rangey
{"title":"印度艾哈迈达巴德地区学校里坐在地板上的孩子的脊柱姿势","authors":"Megha Sheth, Nehal Paresh Shah, Yash Ahuja, Zishan Belim Khan, Parth Parmar, Priyasingh Bhagirath Rangey","doi":"10.5463/dcid.v31i1.864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In some schools in India, children sit on the floor during class time due to non-availability of furniture. The present study was conducted to assess the spinal postures of school-going children when seated in various positions on the floor. Method: The cross-sectional survey included 62 children by random selection. The boys and girls were from classes 1 - 8. Photographs were taken in four positions: A-standing; B-sitting on the floor while looking at teacher or board; C-sitting on the floor and looking down while writing in books; D-sitting on the floor and copying from the blackboard. Markers were placed on anatomical points: tragus, canthus, C7 vertebra, T12 vertebra, greater trochanter and the lateral malleolus. Craniovertebral angle (CVA), gaze angle, trunk angle and sway angle in degrees were measured using Surgimap software. Differences in mean angles in various positions were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Post-hoc analysis was performed using Dunn-Sidak correction test. Results: Mean CVA in position A (standing) was 54.11 + 7.0 degrees; in position B it was 41.7 + 9.2 degrees; in position C it was 43.60 + 43.09 degrees; and, in position D it was 8.8 + 16.85 degrees. Mean gaze angle in position A was 20.01 + 9.18 degrees; in position B it was 26.99 + 10.15 degrees; gaze angle could not be measured in position C (when the students looked into their books); and, in position D it was 35.08 + 9.164 degrees. Mean trunk angle in position A was 147.95 + 9.6 degrees; in position B it was 132.80 + 10.11 degrees; in position C it was 132.80 + 10.69 degrees; and, in position D it was 128.64 + 10.80 degrees. Mean sway angle was 160.91 + 7.70 degrees in standing position. Statistics showed significant difference between the angles in all the different positions (p<0.001). Conclusion: In schools without appropriate furniture, sitting on the floor leads to a significant alteration in spinal postures among school-going children. Increased stress on the neck and back may predispose these children to early degenerative changes. Suitable furniture needs to be provided and good posture needs to be taught to children. Limitations: Detailed pain assessment and comparison between higher and lower classes could not be done.","PeriodicalId":179630,"journal":{"name":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal Postures of Children seated on the floor in Schools in Ahmedabad District, India\",\"authors\":\"Megha Sheth, Nehal Paresh Shah, Yash Ahuja, Zishan Belim Khan, Parth Parmar, Priyasingh Bhagirath Rangey\",\"doi\":\"10.5463/dcid.v31i1.864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: In some schools in India, children sit on the floor during class time due to non-availability of furniture. The present study was conducted to assess the spinal postures of school-going children when seated in various positions on the floor. Method: The cross-sectional survey included 62 children by random selection. The boys and girls were from classes 1 - 8. Photographs were taken in four positions: A-standing; B-sitting on the floor while looking at teacher or board; C-sitting on the floor and looking down while writing in books; D-sitting on the floor and copying from the blackboard. Markers were placed on anatomical points: tragus, canthus, C7 vertebra, T12 vertebra, greater trochanter and the lateral malleolus. Craniovertebral angle (CVA), gaze angle, trunk angle and sway angle in degrees were measured using Surgimap software. Differences in mean angles in various positions were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Post-hoc analysis was performed using Dunn-Sidak correction test. Results: Mean CVA in position A (standing) was 54.11 + 7.0 degrees; in position B it was 41.7 + 9.2 degrees; in position C it was 43.60 + 43.09 degrees; and, in position D it was 8.8 + 16.85 degrees. Mean gaze angle in position A was 20.01 + 9.18 degrees; in position B it was 26.99 + 10.15 degrees; gaze angle could not be measured in position C (when the students looked into their books); and, in position D it was 35.08 + 9.164 degrees. Mean trunk angle in position A was 147.95 + 9.6 degrees; in position B it was 132.80 + 10.11 degrees; in position C it was 132.80 + 10.69 degrees; and, in position D it was 128.64 + 10.80 degrees. Mean sway angle was 160.91 + 7.70 degrees in standing position. Statistics showed significant difference between the angles in all the different positions (p<0.001). Conclusion: In schools without appropriate furniture, sitting on the floor leads to a significant alteration in spinal postures among school-going children. Increased stress on the neck and back may predispose these children to early degenerative changes. Suitable furniture needs to be provided and good posture needs to be taught to children. Limitations: Detailed pain assessment and comparison between higher and lower classes could not be done.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v31i1.864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v31i1.864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在印度的一些学校,由于没有家具,孩子们上课时坐在地板上。目前的研究是为了评估学龄儿童在地板上以不同的姿势坐着时的脊柱姿势。方法:横断面调查随机抽取62例儿童。这些男孩和女孩来自1 - 8班。照片以四种姿势拍摄:站立;坐在地板上看着老师或黑板;——坐在地板上低头写字;d.坐在地板上抄黑板。在解剖点:耳屏、眦、C7椎、T12椎、大转子和外踝上放置标记。采用Surgimap软件测量颅椎角(CVA)、凝视角、躯干角和摇摆角(以度计)。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同位置平均角度的差异。事后分析采用Dunn-Sidak校正检验。结果:A位(站立)CVA平均值为54.11±7.0度;在位置B是41.7 + 9.2度;C位为43.60 + 43.09度;在位置D是8.8 + 16.85度。A位平均凝视角度为20.01 + 9.18度;位置B为26.99 + 10.15度;在位置C(当学生看书时)无法测量凝视角度;D位为35.08 + 9.164度。A位平均干角为147.95±9.6度;位置B为132.80 + 10.11度;位置C为132.80 + 10.69度;位置D为128.64 + 10.80度。站立时的平均摇摆角为160.91 + 7.70度。不同体位的角度差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:在没有适当家具的学校,坐在地板上会导致学龄儿童脊柱姿势的显著改变。颈部和背部的压力增加可能使这些儿童易发生早期退行性变化。需要提供合适的家具,并教孩子们正确的姿势。局限性:不能进行详细的疼痛评估和高低班比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spinal Postures of Children seated on the floor in Schools in Ahmedabad District, India
Purpose: In some schools in India, children sit on the floor during class time due to non-availability of furniture. The present study was conducted to assess the spinal postures of school-going children when seated in various positions on the floor. Method: The cross-sectional survey included 62 children by random selection. The boys and girls were from classes 1 - 8. Photographs were taken in four positions: A-standing; B-sitting on the floor while looking at teacher or board; C-sitting on the floor and looking down while writing in books; D-sitting on the floor and copying from the blackboard. Markers were placed on anatomical points: tragus, canthus, C7 vertebra, T12 vertebra, greater trochanter and the lateral malleolus. Craniovertebral angle (CVA), gaze angle, trunk angle and sway angle in degrees were measured using Surgimap software. Differences in mean angles in various positions were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Post-hoc analysis was performed using Dunn-Sidak correction test. Results: Mean CVA in position A (standing) was 54.11 + 7.0 degrees; in position B it was 41.7 + 9.2 degrees; in position C it was 43.60 + 43.09 degrees; and, in position D it was 8.8 + 16.85 degrees. Mean gaze angle in position A was 20.01 + 9.18 degrees; in position B it was 26.99 + 10.15 degrees; gaze angle could not be measured in position C (when the students looked into their books); and, in position D it was 35.08 + 9.164 degrees. Mean trunk angle in position A was 147.95 + 9.6 degrees; in position B it was 132.80 + 10.11 degrees; in position C it was 132.80 + 10.69 degrees; and, in position D it was 128.64 + 10.80 degrees. Mean sway angle was 160.91 + 7.70 degrees in standing position. Statistics showed significant difference between the angles in all the different positions (p<0.001). Conclusion: In schools without appropriate furniture, sitting on the floor leads to a significant alteration in spinal postures among school-going children. Increased stress on the neck and back may predispose these children to early degenerative changes. Suitable furniture needs to be provided and good posture needs to be taught to children. Limitations: Detailed pain assessment and comparison between higher and lower classes could not be done.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信