带有弹簧/磁体返回机构的触控触发探针的二维凸度特性

Yanhua Chen, Houde Liu, Xueqian Wang, Bin Liang
{"title":"带有弹簧/磁体返回机构的触控触发探针的二维凸度特性","authors":"Yanhua Chen, Houde Liu, Xueqian Wang, Bin Liang","doi":"10.1109/IMCCC.2015.358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Touch trigger probes are most widely used on coordinate measuring machines (CMM) and machine tools. Due to the tripod structure, pretravel of the probe varies when it triggers in different directions, which has been acknowledged as a key error source resulting in large measurement uncertainty. Return mechanism is one of the key factors affecting the probes' pretravel variation and repeatability. Currently, spring and magnet are two main return methods employed in trigger probes. Typical products are TP20 from RENISHAW with a spring return mechanism and T2 from TELES with a magnet return mechanism. Lobbing characteristics of those two kinds of touch trigger probes in the XY plane was studied analytically in this paper. Experiments were carried out on a high precision CMM to exam the mathematical model. Results show that theoretical model is in good consistent with the experiments, Both of the two kinds of probes have obvious lobbing characteristics especially when the stylus is relatively short. Long stylus leads to shrinkage PTV. Overall, TP20 (spring return) has a better performance in experiments, but investigation from probe users show that T2 (magnet return) stands longer due to its noncontact return mechanism.","PeriodicalId":438549,"journal":{"name":"2015 Fifth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2D Lobbing Characteristics of Touch Trigger Probes with Spring/Magnet Return Mechanism\",\"authors\":\"Yanhua Chen, Houde Liu, Xueqian Wang, Bin Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMCCC.2015.358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Touch trigger probes are most widely used on coordinate measuring machines (CMM) and machine tools. Due to the tripod structure, pretravel of the probe varies when it triggers in different directions, which has been acknowledged as a key error source resulting in large measurement uncertainty. Return mechanism is one of the key factors affecting the probes' pretravel variation and repeatability. Currently, spring and magnet are two main return methods employed in trigger probes. Typical products are TP20 from RENISHAW with a spring return mechanism and T2 from TELES with a magnet return mechanism. Lobbing characteristics of those two kinds of touch trigger probes in the XY plane was studied analytically in this paper. Experiments were carried out on a high precision CMM to exam the mathematical model. Results show that theoretical model is in good consistent with the experiments, Both of the two kinds of probes have obvious lobbing characteristics especially when the stylus is relatively short. Long stylus leads to shrinkage PTV. Overall, TP20 (spring return) has a better performance in experiments, but investigation from probe users show that T2 (magnet return) stands longer due to its noncontact return mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Fifth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Fifth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCCC.2015.358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Fifth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCCC.2015.358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

触控触发探头在三坐标测量机(CMM)和机床上的应用最为广泛。由于三脚架结构,在不同方向触发时,探头的预行程会发生变化,这是导致测量不确定度较大的主要误差来源。返回机构是影响探针预行程变化和可重复性的关键因素之一。目前,弹簧和磁体是触发探头的两种主要返回方式。典型的产品是雷尼绍的TP20带弹簧复位机构和TELES的T2带磁铁复位机构。本文对这两种触控触发探头在XY平面上的球动特性进行了分析研究。在高精度三坐标测量机上对数学模型进行了验证。结果表明,理论模型与实验结果吻合较好,两种探针在针尖较短时均具有明显的叶状特征。笔长导致PTV缩水。总体而言,TP20(弹簧回路)在实验中具有更好的性能,但从探头用户的调查中发现,T2(磁铁回路)由于其非接触回路机制,使用时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2D Lobbing Characteristics of Touch Trigger Probes with Spring/Magnet Return Mechanism
Touch trigger probes are most widely used on coordinate measuring machines (CMM) and machine tools. Due to the tripod structure, pretravel of the probe varies when it triggers in different directions, which has been acknowledged as a key error source resulting in large measurement uncertainty. Return mechanism is one of the key factors affecting the probes' pretravel variation and repeatability. Currently, spring and magnet are two main return methods employed in trigger probes. Typical products are TP20 from RENISHAW with a spring return mechanism and T2 from TELES with a magnet return mechanism. Lobbing characteristics of those two kinds of touch trigger probes in the XY plane was studied analytically in this paper. Experiments were carried out on a high precision CMM to exam the mathematical model. Results show that theoretical model is in good consistent with the experiments, Both of the two kinds of probes have obvious lobbing characteristics especially when the stylus is relatively short. Long stylus leads to shrinkage PTV. Overall, TP20 (spring return) has a better performance in experiments, but investigation from probe users show that T2 (magnet return) stands longer due to its noncontact return mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信