甚高多普勒频率补偿系统及性能比较

Changyoung An, H. Ryu
{"title":"甚高多普勒频率补偿系统及性能比较","authors":"Changyoung An, H. Ryu","doi":"10.1109/ComNet47917.2020.9306104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, vehicular communication is very important to provide the broadband data transmission even at the very high speed mobility. The most serious problem is the big Doppler frequency so that the communication system will be degraded due to the big carrier frequency offset (CFO) effect. The low earth orbit (LEO) satellite communication system is typical to show the serious problem since the LEO satellite system moves very fast to keep the orbit altitude. The Doppler effect results in the big carrier frequency offset (CFO) effect, and it can cause the performance degradation in the satellite communication system. So, in this paper, the suppression systems of this very high Doppler frequency are studied and their communication performances are compared. In this paper, 2 kind of Doppler compensation methods are studied: pilot method and phase locked loop (PLL) method. As simulation results show, when the SNR is approximately 5 dB or less, the pilot method provides better performance, compared with the PLL method. However, it sacrifices the data rate because of the insertion of pilot. When the SNR is approximately 6 dB or more, it can be confirmed that the PLL method outperforms than the pilot method, which is almost same to the theoretical performances. However, PLL method does not show good performance in the low SNR range.","PeriodicalId":351664,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)","volume":"1977 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensation Systems and Performance Comparison of the Very High Doppler Frequency\",\"authors\":\"Changyoung An, H. Ryu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ComNet47917.2020.9306104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, vehicular communication is very important to provide the broadband data transmission even at the very high speed mobility. The most serious problem is the big Doppler frequency so that the communication system will be degraded due to the big carrier frequency offset (CFO) effect. The low earth orbit (LEO) satellite communication system is typical to show the serious problem since the LEO satellite system moves very fast to keep the orbit altitude. The Doppler effect results in the big carrier frequency offset (CFO) effect, and it can cause the performance degradation in the satellite communication system. So, in this paper, the suppression systems of this very high Doppler frequency are studied and their communication performances are compared. In this paper, 2 kind of Doppler compensation methods are studied: pilot method and phase locked loop (PLL) method. As simulation results show, when the SNR is approximately 5 dB or less, the pilot method provides better performance, compared with the PLL method. However, it sacrifices the data rate because of the insertion of pilot. When the SNR is approximately 6 dB or more, it can be confirmed that the PLL method outperforms than the pilot method, which is almost same to the theoretical performances. However, PLL method does not show good performance in the low SNR range.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)\",\"volume\":\"1977 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComNet47917.2020.9306104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComNet47917.2020.9306104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近年来,在高速移动的情况下,车载通信对提供宽带数据传输非常重要。最严重的问题是多普勒频率过大,由于载波频偏(CFO)效应大,导致通信系统性能下降。低地球轨道卫星通信系统是典型的表现出严重问题的卫星系统,因为低地球轨道卫星系统移动非常快,以保持轨道高度。在卫星通信系统中,多普勒效应会产生较大的载波频偏效应,导致系统性能下降。因此,本文对这一极高多普勒频率的抑制系统进行了研究,并对其通信性能进行了比较。本文研究了两种多普勒补偿方法:导频法和锁相环法。仿真结果表明,当信噪比约为5 dB或更低时,导频方法比锁相环方法具有更好的性能。但是,由于导频的插入,牺牲了数据速率。当信噪比约为6 dB或更高时,可以证实锁相环方法优于导频方法,且与理论性能基本相同。然而,锁相环方法在低信噪比范围内表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compensation Systems and Performance Comparison of the Very High Doppler Frequency
Recently, vehicular communication is very important to provide the broadband data transmission even at the very high speed mobility. The most serious problem is the big Doppler frequency so that the communication system will be degraded due to the big carrier frequency offset (CFO) effect. The low earth orbit (LEO) satellite communication system is typical to show the serious problem since the LEO satellite system moves very fast to keep the orbit altitude. The Doppler effect results in the big carrier frequency offset (CFO) effect, and it can cause the performance degradation in the satellite communication system. So, in this paper, the suppression systems of this very high Doppler frequency are studied and their communication performances are compared. In this paper, 2 kind of Doppler compensation methods are studied: pilot method and phase locked loop (PLL) method. As simulation results show, when the SNR is approximately 5 dB or less, the pilot method provides better performance, compared with the PLL method. However, it sacrifices the data rate because of the insertion of pilot. When the SNR is approximately 6 dB or more, it can be confirmed that the PLL method outperforms than the pilot method, which is almost same to the theoretical performances. However, PLL method does not show good performance in the low SNR range.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信