争议产品对巴西三个不同研究领域学生的冒犯性

João Lucas Hana Frade, Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira, Janaina de Moura Engracia Giraldi
{"title":"争议产品对巴西三个不同研究领域学生的冒犯性","authors":"João Lucas Hana Frade, Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira, Janaina de Moura Engracia Giraldi","doi":"10.5902/1983465955122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: investigate the offensiveness of controversial products in Brazil, especially the influence of the field of study.\nDesign/methodology/approach: a questionnaire with 11 controversial products was conventionally answered by a sample of 368 college students from the three most popular fields of study in Brazil (i.e. Human Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences, and Exact and Technological Sciences). The offensiveness of each controversial product was measured and compared across those fields of study through t-tests.\nFindings: Controversial products did not easily offend respondents being guns, weight-loss medicine, and female underwear the most offensive ones. In general, students of Human Sciences are the most easily offended and those of Exact and Technological Sciences the least offended. In addition, results showed differences and similarities between people from each field of study.\nOriginality/value: Improvement of our knowledge about controversial products in Brazil, especially about the influence of the field of study in the offensiveness of controversial products.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Offensiveness of controversial products for students of three different fields of study in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"João Lucas Hana Frade, Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira, Janaina de Moura Engracia Giraldi\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1983465955122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: investigate the offensiveness of controversial products in Brazil, especially the influence of the field of study.\\nDesign/methodology/approach: a questionnaire with 11 controversial products was conventionally answered by a sample of 368 college students from the three most popular fields of study in Brazil (i.e. Human Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences, and Exact and Technological Sciences). The offensiveness of each controversial product was measured and compared across those fields of study through t-tests.\\nFindings: Controversial products did not easily offend respondents being guns, weight-loss medicine, and female underwear the most offensive ones. In general, students of Human Sciences are the most easily offended and those of Exact and Technological Sciences the least offended. In addition, results showed differences and similarities between people from each field of study.\\nOriginality/value: Improvement of our knowledge about controversial products in Brazil, especially about the influence of the field of study in the offensiveness of controversial products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Administração da UFSM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465955122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465955122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查有争议的产品在巴西的冒犯性,特别是研究领域的影响。设计/方法/方法:按照惯例,368名来自巴西最受欢迎的三个研究领域(即人文科学、生物与健康科学、精确与技术科学)的大学生回答了一份包含11种有争议产品的问卷。每个有争议的产品的冒犯性是通过t检验在这些研究领域进行测量和比较的。调查结果:有争议的产品不容易冒犯受访者,其中枪支、减肥药和女性内衣最具冒犯性。一般来说,人文科学专业的学生最容易被冒犯,而精确科学和技术科学专业的学生最不容易被冒犯。此外,研究结果还显示了不同研究领域的人之间的差异和相似之处。原创性/价值:提高我们对巴西有争议产品的认识,特别是研究领域对有争议产品冒犯性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Offensiveness of controversial products for students of three different fields of study in Brazil
Purpose: investigate the offensiveness of controversial products in Brazil, especially the influence of the field of study. Design/methodology/approach: a questionnaire with 11 controversial products was conventionally answered by a sample of 368 college students from the three most popular fields of study in Brazil (i.e. Human Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences, and Exact and Technological Sciences). The offensiveness of each controversial product was measured and compared across those fields of study through t-tests. Findings: Controversial products did not easily offend respondents being guns, weight-loss medicine, and female underwear the most offensive ones. In general, students of Human Sciences are the most easily offended and those of Exact and Technological Sciences the least offended. In addition, results showed differences and similarities between people from each field of study. Originality/value: Improvement of our knowledge about controversial products in Brazil, especially about the influence of the field of study in the offensiveness of controversial products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信