{"title":"道德困境中的道德虚伪","authors":"Lin Zhumei, Zhu Liqi","doi":"10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moral hypocrisy is a phenomenon in which individuals evaluating other people's moral transgressions differ from their evaluations of the same transgressions enacted by themselves. The present study examined whether there is a moral hypocrisy when participants take different roles in moral dilemma. We found that although participants' decisions were no different when they taking different roles in moral dilemmas, the participants in the role of a protagonist took more time to make a decision. These results demonstrated that there may be an implicit moral hypocrisy in moral dilemmas and supported the view that it is the volitionally-guided justifications that results i n hypocrisy.","PeriodicalId":306383,"journal":{"name":"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral hypocrisy in moral dilemma\",\"authors\":\"Lin Zhumei, Zhu Liqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moral hypocrisy is a phenomenon in which individuals evaluating other people's moral transgressions differ from their evaluations of the same transgressions enacted by themselves. The present study examined whether there is a moral hypocrisy when participants take different roles in moral dilemma. We found that although participants' decisions were no different when they taking different roles in moral dilemmas, the participants in the role of a protagonist took more time to make a decision. These results demonstrated that there may be an implicit moral hypocrisy in moral dilemmas and supported the view that it is the volitionally-guided justifications that results i n hypocrisy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Moral hypocrisy is a phenomenon in which individuals evaluating other people's moral transgressions differ from their evaluations of the same transgressions enacted by themselves. The present study examined whether there is a moral hypocrisy when participants take different roles in moral dilemma. We found that although participants' decisions were no different when they taking different roles in moral dilemmas, the participants in the role of a protagonist took more time to make a decision. These results demonstrated that there may be an implicit moral hypocrisy in moral dilemmas and supported the view that it is the volitionally-guided justifications that results i n hypocrisy.