{"title":"激进教育学的主张,或如何重新思考价值","authors":"E. Manning","doi":"10.4324/9781351256766-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Let classrooms be invitations for study, not knowledge consumption. Beware of the idea that certain things “must be covered.” Study, Fred Moten and Stefano Harney argue, is about creating dissonance. It’s about allowing learning to continue, rather than continuously cutting learning off in the name of what we’ve decided, in advance of our coming together, is worthy of being called knowledge. Don’t look too hard for the through-thread. Don't worry too much about drawing a line. Make learning a weave.","PeriodicalId":183141,"journal":{"name":"Affect in Literacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propositions for a Radical Pedagogy, or How to Rethink Value\",\"authors\":\"E. Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351256766-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Let classrooms be invitations for study, not knowledge consumption. Beware of the idea that certain things “must be covered.” Study, Fred Moten and Stefano Harney argue, is about creating dissonance. It’s about allowing learning to continue, rather than continuously cutting learning off in the name of what we’ve decided, in advance of our coming together, is worthy of being called knowledge. Don’t look too hard for the through-thread. Don't worry too much about drawing a line. Make learning a weave.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affect in Literacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affect in Literacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256766-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affect in Literacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256766-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Propositions for a Radical Pedagogy, or How to Rethink Value
Let classrooms be invitations for study, not knowledge consumption. Beware of the idea that certain things “must be covered.” Study, Fred Moten and Stefano Harney argue, is about creating dissonance. It’s about allowing learning to continue, rather than continuously cutting learning off in the name of what we’ve decided, in advance of our coming together, is worthy of being called knowledge. Don’t look too hard for the through-thread. Don't worry too much about drawing a line. Make learning a weave.