波斯人以斯帖"米德拉什"

A. Silverstein
{"title":"波斯人以斯帖\"米德拉什\"","authors":"A. Silverstein","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198797227.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that there are particularly “Persian” interpretations of, and ideas about, Esther (and other, related, biblical books more generally) that are at odds with “Western” ideas on the subject. The chapter examines the entries on “Haman” and “Haman-Suz” (“the burning of Haman”) in a highly influential, twentieth-century Persian dictionary, where it is stated that Haman and Abraham were brothers. While it would appear that this statement is a mere error, it is shown that Jews and Muslims in Persia, from ancient to modern times, understood Esther, Haman, Abraham, and the latter’s brother Haran, in ways that make a sibling relationship between Abraham and Haman entirely feasible. That these sources are culturally “Persian” yet cross confessional boundaries, raises the possibility that there was a particularly “Persian” midrashic tradition.","PeriodicalId":308769,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Scholarship Online","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Persian Esther “Midrash”\",\"authors\":\"A. Silverstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198797227.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter argues that there are particularly “Persian” interpretations of, and ideas about, Esther (and other, related, biblical books more generally) that are at odds with “Western” ideas on the subject. The chapter examines the entries on “Haman” and “Haman-Suz” (“the burning of Haman”) in a highly influential, twentieth-century Persian dictionary, where it is stated that Haman and Abraham were brothers. While it would appear that this statement is a mere error, it is shown that Jews and Muslims in Persia, from ancient to modern times, understood Esther, Haman, Abraham, and the latter’s brother Haran, in ways that make a sibling relationship between Abraham and Haman entirely feasible. That these sources are culturally “Persian” yet cross confessional boundaries, raises the possibility that there was a particularly “Persian” midrashic tradition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Scholarship Online\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Scholarship Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198797227.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Scholarship Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198797227.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章认为,对《以斯帖记》(以及其他更广泛的、相关的圣经书籍)的特别“波斯人”的解释和观点,与“西方”对这一主题的看法不一致。本章检查了一本极具影响力的二十世纪波斯语词典中关于“哈曼”和“哈曼-苏兹”(“哈曼的燃烧”)的条目,其中说哈曼和亚伯拉罕是兄弟。虽然这句话似乎只是一个错误,但它表明,从古代到现代,波斯的犹太人和穆斯林都理解以斯帖、哈曼、亚伯拉罕和后者的兄弟哈兰,从而使亚伯拉罕和哈曼之间的兄弟关系完全可行。这些来源在文化上是“波斯的”,但跨越了忏悔的界限,提出了一种特别“波斯的”米德拉什传统的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Persian Esther “Midrash”
This chapter argues that there are particularly “Persian” interpretations of, and ideas about, Esther (and other, related, biblical books more generally) that are at odds with “Western” ideas on the subject. The chapter examines the entries on “Haman” and “Haman-Suz” (“the burning of Haman”) in a highly influential, twentieth-century Persian dictionary, where it is stated that Haman and Abraham were brothers. While it would appear that this statement is a mere error, it is shown that Jews and Muslims in Persia, from ancient to modern times, understood Esther, Haman, Abraham, and the latter’s brother Haran, in ways that make a sibling relationship between Abraham and Haman entirely feasible. That these sources are culturally “Persian” yet cross confessional boundaries, raises the possibility that there was a particularly “Persian” midrashic tradition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信