第106(2)判例法中的TFEU:福利与市场利益的内部化与定制化平衡

Martina Melcher
{"title":"第106(2)判例法中的TFEU:福利与市场利益的内部化与定制化平衡","authors":"Martina Melcher","doi":"10.25364/01.6:2019.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU law on public services is characterized by the need to reconcile competing EU and Member States interests as well as to accommodate both market and welfare interests. This paper explores how the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the Commission conduct this multi-level balancing of interests in the context of Article 106 (2) TFEU. To provide a full picture, this balancing is assessed by looking into both the requirements for the derogation and its scope of application. In essence, it is suggested that the EU has internalized the aforementioned struggle of interests. On the one hand, the EU, represented by the CJEU and the Commission, has assumed an increasingly dominant role by gradually limiting the autonomy and margin of discretion of the Member States regarding the provision, commission and financing of public services. On the other hand, it is argued that Article 106 (2) TFEU allows only a ‘customized and limited derogation’ from market and competition rules and has to be construed in consideration of the ‘general compatibility test’ which identifies economic activities in the first place. As a whole, Article 106 (2) TFEU constitutes a working system that reconciles potentially conflicting interests in favour of functioning public services. However, it is crucial that its premises and limits are respected.","PeriodicalId":258698,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Law Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article 106 (2) TFEU in Case Law: Internalization and Customized Balancing of Welfare and Market Interests\",\"authors\":\"Martina Melcher\",\"doi\":\"10.25364/01.6:2019.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The EU law on public services is characterized by the need to reconcile competing EU and Member States interests as well as to accommodate both market and welfare interests. This paper explores how the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the Commission conduct this multi-level balancing of interests in the context of Article 106 (2) TFEU. To provide a full picture, this balancing is assessed by looking into both the requirements for the derogation and its scope of application. In essence, it is suggested that the EU has internalized the aforementioned struggle of interests. On the one hand, the EU, represented by the CJEU and the Commission, has assumed an increasingly dominant role by gradually limiting the autonomy and margin of discretion of the Member States regarding the provision, commission and financing of public services. On the other hand, it is argued that Article 106 (2) TFEU allows only a ‘customized and limited derogation’ from market and competition rules and has to be construed in consideration of the ‘general compatibility test’ which identifies economic activities in the first place. As a whole, Article 106 (2) TFEU constitutes a working system that reconciles potentially conflicting interests in favour of functioning public services. However, it is crucial that its premises and limits are respected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austrian Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austrian Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25364/01.6:2019.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25364/01.6:2019.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

欧盟关于公共服务的法律的特点是需要调和相互竞争的欧盟和成员国的利益,并兼顾市场和福利利益。本文探讨了欧盟法院(CJEU)和欧盟委员会如何在TFEU第106(2)条的背景下进行这种多层次的利益平衡。为了提供全面的情况,我们通过研究减损的要求及其适用范围来评估这种平衡。从本质上讲,这表明欧盟已经将上述利益斗争内化了。一方面,以欧洲法院和欧盟委员会为代表的欧盟,通过逐步限制成员国在公共服务的提供、委托和融资方面的自主权和自由裁量权,发挥了越来越大的主导作用。另一方面,有人认为,第106(2)条TFEU只允许对市场和竞争规则进行“定制和有限的克减”,并且必须考虑首先确定经济活动的“一般兼容性测试”来解释。作为一个整体,第106(2)条构成了一个工作系统,它调和了有利于正常运作的公共服务的潜在冲突利益。然而,尊重其前提和限度是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Article 106 (2) TFEU in Case Law: Internalization and Customized Balancing of Welfare and Market Interests
The EU law on public services is characterized by the need to reconcile competing EU and Member States interests as well as to accommodate both market and welfare interests. This paper explores how the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the Commission conduct this multi-level balancing of interests in the context of Article 106 (2) TFEU. To provide a full picture, this balancing is assessed by looking into both the requirements for the derogation and its scope of application. In essence, it is suggested that the EU has internalized the aforementioned struggle of interests. On the one hand, the EU, represented by the CJEU and the Commission, has assumed an increasingly dominant role by gradually limiting the autonomy and margin of discretion of the Member States regarding the provision, commission and financing of public services. On the other hand, it is argued that Article 106 (2) TFEU allows only a ‘customized and limited derogation’ from market and competition rules and has to be construed in consideration of the ‘general compatibility test’ which identifies economic activities in the first place. As a whole, Article 106 (2) TFEU constitutes a working system that reconciles potentially conflicting interests in favour of functioning public services. However, it is crucial that its premises and limits are respected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信