镇静内镜对结直肠腺瘤检出率的影响:一项多中心研究

Jiawei Zhou, Zhen Li, Rui Ji, Pei-zhu Wang, Ai-jun Zhang, Kangkang Wu, Cheng-Xia Liu, Qiong Niu, Y. Chu, Xiu-Feng Su, X. Zuo, Yan-Qing Li
{"title":"镇静内镜对结直肠腺瘤检出率的影响:一项多中心研究","authors":"Jiawei Zhou, Zhen Li, Rui Ji, Pei-zhu Wang, Ai-jun Zhang, Kangkang Wu, Cheng-Xia Liu, Qiong Niu, Y. Chu, Xiu-Feng Su, X. Zuo, Yan-Qing Li","doi":"10.14218/csp.2023.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Studies on the effect of sedated endoscopy on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) remain scarce. The present study aims to determine whether sedation can help improve ADR and AADR. Methods: Colonoscopies conducted in four endoscopy centers from January 2012 to July 2019 were included to create a propensity score-matched cohort, and compare the endoscopic factors. Results: The colonoscopies of 216,400 cases were included. The ADR (32.24% vs. 31.63%, p < 0.05), AADR (5.59% vs. 5.39%, p < 0.05), and polyp (20.61% vs. 20.21%, p < 0.05) increased in the sedated endoscopy group, especially for flat adenomas (44.80% vs. 43.95%, p < 0.05) and adenomas of 0–5 mm (66.99% vs. 66.24%, p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference, in terms of lesion site. Furthermore, the number of biopsies per colonoscopy was significantly higher in the sedated group (0.79 ± 0.93 vs. 0.56 ± 0.80, p < 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant increase in electronic (0.92% vs. 0.83%, p < 0.05) and chemical staining (0.57% vs. 0.45%, p < 0.001) in the sedated group. Conclusions: The ADR, AADR and polyp detection rate increased for sedated colonoscopy, especially for flat adenomas and adenomas of 0–5 mm. In addition, the frequency of staining, image enhancement techniques, and number of biopsies per colonoscopy increased in sedated colonoscopy.","PeriodicalId":273565,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Screening and Prevention","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Sedated Endoscopy on Colorectal Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Study\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Zhou, Zhen Li, Rui Ji, Pei-zhu Wang, Ai-jun Zhang, Kangkang Wu, Cheng-Xia Liu, Qiong Niu, Y. Chu, Xiu-Feng Su, X. Zuo, Yan-Qing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.14218/csp.2023.00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objectives: Studies on the effect of sedated endoscopy on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) remain scarce. The present study aims to determine whether sedation can help improve ADR and AADR. Methods: Colonoscopies conducted in four endoscopy centers from January 2012 to July 2019 were included to create a propensity score-matched cohort, and compare the endoscopic factors. Results: The colonoscopies of 216,400 cases were included. The ADR (32.24% vs. 31.63%, p < 0.05), AADR (5.59% vs. 5.39%, p < 0.05), and polyp (20.61% vs. 20.21%, p < 0.05) increased in the sedated endoscopy group, especially for flat adenomas (44.80% vs. 43.95%, p < 0.05) and adenomas of 0–5 mm (66.99% vs. 66.24%, p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference, in terms of lesion site. Furthermore, the number of biopsies per colonoscopy was significantly higher in the sedated group (0.79 ± 0.93 vs. 0.56 ± 0.80, p < 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant increase in electronic (0.92% vs. 0.83%, p < 0.05) and chemical staining (0.57% vs. 0.45%, p < 0.001) in the sedated group. Conclusions: The ADR, AADR and polyp detection rate increased for sedated colonoscopy, especially for flat adenomas and adenomas of 0–5 mm. In addition, the frequency of staining, image enhancement techniques, and number of biopsies per colonoscopy increased in sedated colonoscopy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Screening and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Screening and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14218/csp.2023.00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Screening and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14218/csp.2023.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:关于镇静内镜对腺瘤检出率(ADR)和晚期腺瘤检出率(AADR)影响的研究尚少。本研究旨在确定镇静是否有助于改善ADR和AADR。方法:纳入2012年1月至2019年7月在四个内镜中心进行的结肠镜检查,创建倾向评分匹配的队列,并比较内镜因素。结果:纳入结肠镜检查21.64万例。镇静内镜组ADR(32.24%∶31.63%,p < 0.05)、AADR(5.59%∶5.39%,p < 0.05)、息肉(20.61%∶20.21%,p < 0.05)发生率均有所增加,其中扁平腺瘤(44.80%∶43.95%,p < 0.05)和0 ~ 5mm腺瘤(66.99%∶66.24%,p < 0.05)发生率最高。但在病变部位上,两组无显著差异。此外,镇静组每次结肠镜检查活检次数明显高于镇静组(0.79±0.93比0.56±0.80,p < 0.001)。此外,镇静组的电子染色(0.92%比0.83%,p < 0.05)和化学染色(0.57%比0.45%,p < 0.001)均显著增加。结论:镇静结肠镜下不良反应(ADR)、AADR及息肉检出率均增加,尤以扁平腺瘤及0 ~ 5mm腺瘤明显增加。此外,在镇静结肠镜检查中,染色频率、图像增强技术和每次结肠镜活检次数增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Sedated Endoscopy on Colorectal Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Study
Background and objectives: Studies on the effect of sedated endoscopy on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) remain scarce. The present study aims to determine whether sedation can help improve ADR and AADR. Methods: Colonoscopies conducted in four endoscopy centers from January 2012 to July 2019 were included to create a propensity score-matched cohort, and compare the endoscopic factors. Results: The colonoscopies of 216,400 cases were included. The ADR (32.24% vs. 31.63%, p < 0.05), AADR (5.59% vs. 5.39%, p < 0.05), and polyp (20.61% vs. 20.21%, p < 0.05) increased in the sedated endoscopy group, especially for flat adenomas (44.80% vs. 43.95%, p < 0.05) and adenomas of 0–5 mm (66.99% vs. 66.24%, p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference, in terms of lesion site. Furthermore, the number of biopsies per colonoscopy was significantly higher in the sedated group (0.79 ± 0.93 vs. 0.56 ± 0.80, p < 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant increase in electronic (0.92% vs. 0.83%, p < 0.05) and chemical staining (0.57% vs. 0.45%, p < 0.001) in the sedated group. Conclusions: The ADR, AADR and polyp detection rate increased for sedated colonoscopy, especially for flat adenomas and adenomas of 0–5 mm. In addition, the frequency of staining, image enhancement techniques, and number of biopsies per colonoscopy increased in sedated colonoscopy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信