{"title":"重大事故医疗管理绩效指标——质量控制的可能工具?","authors":"A. Rüter, P. Örtenwall, T. Wikström","doi":"10.1080/15031430410023355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective was to determine the outcome when applying a set of proposed performance indicators on previously published reports from major incidents. Methods: A set of 20 different performance indicators were proposed. These indicators were applied to 13 reports from major incidents issued by the KAMEDO organization. Results: The most frequently reported problems were command and control at the scene (11/13) followed by communication and command and control at the strategic level. In 25% of the published reports there was enough information available to apply the performance indicators, and in these the goal and/or objective was met in 67%. Conclusion: Performance indicators for the medical management of major incidents and disaster can to a limited extent be applicable to retrospective studies. Performance indicators might be a tool for evaluating the medical response if reports are made with a different template. Further studies are needed in order to validate which indicators to use.","PeriodicalId":257480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Indicators for Major Incident Medical Management – A Possible Tool for Quality Control?\",\"authors\":\"A. Rüter, P. Örtenwall, T. Wikström\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15031430410023355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective was to determine the outcome when applying a set of proposed performance indicators on previously published reports from major incidents. Methods: A set of 20 different performance indicators were proposed. These indicators were applied to 13 reports from major incidents issued by the KAMEDO organization. Results: The most frequently reported problems were command and control at the scene (11/13) followed by communication and command and control at the strategic level. In 25% of the published reports there was enough information available to apply the performance indicators, and in these the goal and/or objective was met in 67%. Conclusion: Performance indicators for the medical management of major incidents and disaster can to a limited extent be applicable to retrospective studies. Performance indicators might be a tool for evaluating the medical response if reports are made with a different template. Further studies are needed in order to validate which indicators to use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Disaster Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Disaster Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15031430410023355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15031430410023355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance Indicators for Major Incident Medical Management – A Possible Tool for Quality Control?
Objective: The objective was to determine the outcome when applying a set of proposed performance indicators on previously published reports from major incidents. Methods: A set of 20 different performance indicators were proposed. These indicators were applied to 13 reports from major incidents issued by the KAMEDO organization. Results: The most frequently reported problems were command and control at the scene (11/13) followed by communication and command and control at the strategic level. In 25% of the published reports there was enough information available to apply the performance indicators, and in these the goal and/or objective was met in 67%. Conclusion: Performance indicators for the medical management of major incidents and disaster can to a limited extent be applicable to retrospective studies. Performance indicators might be a tool for evaluating the medical response if reports are made with a different template. Further studies are needed in order to validate which indicators to use.