探索参与性伙伴关系:由边缘化青年、为边缘化青年和与边缘化青年共同做出具有公平后果的决定

Edna Tan, Angela Calabrese Barton, Myunghwan Shin, Carmen Turner
{"title":"探索参与性伙伴关系:由边缘化青年、为边缘化青年和与边缘化青年共同做出具有公平后果的决定","authors":"Edna Tan, Angela Calabrese Barton, Myunghwan Shin, Carmen Turner","doi":"10.1145/3003397.3003398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we investigated the role youth participatory ethnography played as a pedagogical approach to supporting youth in making. To do so, we examined in-depth cases of youth makers from traditionally marginalized communities in two makerspace clubs in two different mid-sized US cities over the course of three years. Drawing from mobilities of learning studies and participatory frameworks, our findings indicate that participatory ethnography as pedagogical practice repositioned youth and making by helping to foreground youths' relationality to people, communities, activities and timescales in collaborative, critical and connected ways. This pedagogical stance centralized co-making (including the co-production of design problems and solutions with a wide range of stake holders across setting and time). Three pedagogical principles emerged from analysis of these two interrelated findings: Participatory ethnography as pedagogy 1) emphasized youth participation, not just as respondents, but as people who contribute to the research by bringing in their concerns; 2) situated knowledge production within local contexts in decolonizing ways, and 3) contributed to the improvement of conditions for youth. We conclude with a discussion of how these pedagogical principles can inform the equity agenda in making.","PeriodicalId":296670,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probing participatory partnerships: Equitably-consequential making by, for and with marginalized youth\",\"authors\":\"Edna Tan, Angela Calabrese Barton, Myunghwan Shin, Carmen Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3003397.3003398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we investigated the role youth participatory ethnography played as a pedagogical approach to supporting youth in making. To do so, we examined in-depth cases of youth makers from traditionally marginalized communities in two makerspace clubs in two different mid-sized US cities over the course of three years. Drawing from mobilities of learning studies and participatory frameworks, our findings indicate that participatory ethnography as pedagogical practice repositioned youth and making by helping to foreground youths' relationality to people, communities, activities and timescales in collaborative, critical and connected ways. This pedagogical stance centralized co-making (including the co-production of design problems and solutions with a wide range of stake holders across setting and time). Three pedagogical principles emerged from analysis of these two interrelated findings: Participatory ethnography as pedagogy 1) emphasized youth participation, not just as respondents, but as people who contribute to the research by bringing in their concerns; 2) situated knowledge production within local contexts in decolonizing ways, and 3) contributed to the improvement of conditions for youth. We conclude with a discussion of how these pedagogical principles can inform the equity agenda in making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003397.3003398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003397.3003398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们调查了青年参与性民族志作为一种支持青年决策的教学方法所起的作用。为此,我们在三年的时间里深入研究了美国两个不同中型城市的两个创客空间俱乐部中来自传统边缘化社区的青年创客的案例。根据学习研究的流动性和参与性框架,我们的研究结果表明,参与性人种学作为一种教学实践,通过以协作、批判和联系的方式,帮助突出青年与人、社区、活动和时间尺度的关系,重新定位了青年。这种教学立场集中于共同制作(包括跨环境和时间与广泛的利益相关者共同制作设计问题和解决方案)。通过对这两个相互关联的发现的分析,出现了三个教学原则:作为教育学的参与式民族志1)强调青年的参与,不仅仅是作为受访者,而是作为通过带来他们的关注来为研究做出贡献的人;2)以非殖民化的方式将知识生产置于当地环境中,3)有助于改善青年的条件。最后,我们讨论了这些教学原则如何在制定过程中为公平议程提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probing participatory partnerships: Equitably-consequential making by, for and with marginalized youth
In this paper we investigated the role youth participatory ethnography played as a pedagogical approach to supporting youth in making. To do so, we examined in-depth cases of youth makers from traditionally marginalized communities in two makerspace clubs in two different mid-sized US cities over the course of three years. Drawing from mobilities of learning studies and participatory frameworks, our findings indicate that participatory ethnography as pedagogical practice repositioned youth and making by helping to foreground youths' relationality to people, communities, activities and timescales in collaborative, critical and connected ways. This pedagogical stance centralized co-making (including the co-production of design problems and solutions with a wide range of stake holders across setting and time). Three pedagogical principles emerged from analysis of these two interrelated findings: Participatory ethnography as pedagogy 1) emphasized youth participation, not just as respondents, but as people who contribute to the research by bringing in their concerns; 2) situated knowledge production within local contexts in decolonizing ways, and 3) contributed to the improvement of conditions for youth. We conclude with a discussion of how these pedagogical principles can inform the equity agenda in making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信