国际货物买卖中根本违约的定义

Uroš Zdravković
{"title":"国际货物买卖中根本违约的定义","authors":"Uroš Zdravković","doi":"10.5937/zrpfn0-34163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental breach of contract is defined in Article 25 of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), which states: \"A breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it results in such detriment to the other party as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result.\" When a fundamental breach of contract occurs, the deprived party (seller or buyer) has a right to avoid a contract. Avoidance of contract is the last resort remedy applicable in case other remedies are ineffective. Pursuant to Article 25 of the CISG, there are two criteria which must be fulfilled for a fundamental breach of contract to exist. The first criterion is objective; it comprises two conditions: a) there is a breach of obligation defined in the contract or in the CISG; and b) such a breach substantially deprives the other party of what the party is entitled to expect under the contract. The second criterion is subjective: the breaching party has to foresee such a result. Although this criterion is essentially subjective, it contains an objective element, embodied in the use of the reasonable person standard. Hence, even when the breaching party has not foreseen substantial deprivation of the other party as a result of breach, a substantial breach of contract will be deemed to exist if a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances could have foreseen such a result.","PeriodicalId":192224,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Definition of fundamental breach of contract on international sale of goods\",\"authors\":\"Uroš Zdravković\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/zrpfn0-34163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fundamental breach of contract is defined in Article 25 of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), which states: \\\"A breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it results in such detriment to the other party as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result.\\\" When a fundamental breach of contract occurs, the deprived party (seller or buyer) has a right to avoid a contract. Avoidance of contract is the last resort remedy applicable in case other remedies are ineffective. Pursuant to Article 25 of the CISG, there are two criteria which must be fulfilled for a fundamental breach of contract to exist. The first criterion is objective; it comprises two conditions: a) there is a breach of obligation defined in the contract or in the CISG; and b) such a breach substantially deprives the other party of what the party is entitled to expect under the contract. The second criterion is subjective: the breaching party has to foresee such a result. Although this criterion is essentially subjective, it contains an objective element, embodied in the use of the reasonable person standard. Hence, even when the breaching party has not foreseen substantial deprivation of the other party as a result of breach, a substantial breach of contract will be deemed to exist if a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances could have foreseen such a result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-34163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-34163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(CISG)第25条对根本违约作出了定义,该条规定:“一方当事人的违约行为,如果对另一方造成损害,实质上剥夺了他根据合同有权期待的东西,则构成根本违约,除非违约方没有预见到这种结果,而在同样情况下,同类的通情达理的人也不会预见到这种结果。”当根本违约发生时,被剥夺权利的一方(卖方或买方)有权避免签订合同。在其他救济无效的情况下,规避合同是最后的救济手段。根据《销售公约》第25条,存在根本违约必须满足两个标准。第一个标准是客观的;它包括两个条件:a)违反了合同或《销售公约》所规定的义务;b)这种违约实质上剥夺了另一方根据合同有权期望的东西。第二个标准是主观的:违约方必须预见到这样的结果。虽然这一标准本质上是主观的,但它也包含客观因素,具体体现在合理人标准的使用上。因此,即使违约方没有预见到另一方因违约而遭受重大损失,如果在相同情况下,同类的理性人能够预见到这种结果,则将被视为存在重大违约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Definition of fundamental breach of contract on international sale of goods
The fundamental breach of contract is defined in Article 25 of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), which states: "A breach of contract committed by one of the parties is fundamental if it results in such detriment to the other party as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract, unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result." When a fundamental breach of contract occurs, the deprived party (seller or buyer) has a right to avoid a contract. Avoidance of contract is the last resort remedy applicable in case other remedies are ineffective. Pursuant to Article 25 of the CISG, there are two criteria which must be fulfilled for a fundamental breach of contract to exist. The first criterion is objective; it comprises two conditions: a) there is a breach of obligation defined in the contract or in the CISG; and b) such a breach substantially deprives the other party of what the party is entitled to expect under the contract. The second criterion is subjective: the breaching party has to foresee such a result. Although this criterion is essentially subjective, it contains an objective element, embodied in the use of the reasonable person standard. Hence, even when the breaching party has not foreseen substantial deprivation of the other party as a result of breach, a substantial breach of contract will be deemed to exist if a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances could have foreseen such a result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信