L. Hamieh, N. Mehdi, Ghazalah Omeirat, A. Chehab, A. Kayssi
{"title":"延迟和IDDT测试在检测纳米CMOS加法器电阻性开路缺陷中的有效性","authors":"L. Hamieh, N. Mehdi, Ghazalah Omeirat, A. Chehab, A. Kayssi","doi":"10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of different testing schemes in detecting resistive-open defects in adder circuits implemented using different CMOS technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm and 16 nm). We assess the detection capabilities of four testing techniques taking into consideration the wide process variations associated with the different nanometer technologies. The first three techniques are based on the transient supply current, iDDT, and the fourth technique is based on delay testing. The first iDDT method uses the RMS value of the wavelet transform of the transient power supply or ground currents. The second one uses the normalized RMS value of the wavelet transform. The third one uses the peak value of iDDT. The fourth technique measures the primary input-to-output delay. The experimental results show that the delay test is the most effective among all tests. The iDDT test with normalized RMS value of wavelet transform comes second. The other two tests were less effective than the first two, especially in the case of smaller technologies (22 and 16 nm).","PeriodicalId":167786,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of delay and IDDT tests in detecting resistive open defects for nanometer CMOS adder circuits\",\"authors\":\"L. Hamieh, N. Mehdi, Ghazalah Omeirat, A. Chehab, A. Kayssi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of different testing schemes in detecting resistive-open defects in adder circuits implemented using different CMOS technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm and 16 nm). We assess the detection capabilities of four testing techniques taking into consideration the wide process variations associated with the different nanometer technologies. The first three techniques are based on the transient supply current, iDDT, and the fourth technique is based on delay testing. The first iDDT method uses the RMS value of the wavelet transform of the transient power supply or ground currents. The second one uses the normalized RMS value of the wavelet transform. The third one uses the peak value of iDDT. The fourth technique measures the primary input-to-output delay. The experimental results show that the delay test is the most effective among all tests. The iDDT test with normalized RMS value of wavelet transform comes second. The other two tests were less effective than the first two, especially in the case of smaller technologies (22 and 16 nm).\",\"PeriodicalId\":167786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effectiveness of delay and IDDT tests in detecting resistive open defects for nanometer CMOS adder circuits
In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of different testing schemes in detecting resistive-open defects in adder circuits implemented using different CMOS technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm and 16 nm). We assess the detection capabilities of four testing techniques taking into consideration the wide process variations associated with the different nanometer technologies. The first three techniques are based on the transient supply current, iDDT, and the fourth technique is based on delay testing. The first iDDT method uses the RMS value of the wavelet transform of the transient power supply or ground currents. The second one uses the normalized RMS value of the wavelet transform. The third one uses the peak value of iDDT. The fourth technique measures the primary input-to-output delay. The experimental results show that the delay test is the most effective among all tests. The iDDT test with normalized RMS value of wavelet transform comes second. The other two tests were less effective than the first two, especially in the case of smaller technologies (22 and 16 nm).