延迟和IDDT测试在检测纳米CMOS加法器电阻性开路缺陷中的有效性

L. Hamieh, N. Mehdi, Ghazalah Omeirat, A. Chehab, A. Kayssi
{"title":"延迟和IDDT测试在检测纳米CMOS加法器电阻性开路缺陷中的有效性","authors":"L. Hamieh, N. Mehdi, Ghazalah Omeirat, A. Chehab, A. Kayssi","doi":"10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of different testing schemes in detecting resistive-open defects in adder circuits implemented using different CMOS technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm and 16 nm). We assess the detection capabilities of four testing techniques taking into consideration the wide process variations associated with the different nanometer technologies. The first three techniques are based on the transient supply current, iDDT, and the fourth technique is based on delay testing. The first iDDT method uses the RMS value of the wavelet transform of the transient power supply or ground currents. The second one uses the normalized RMS value of the wavelet transform. The third one uses the peak value of iDDT. The fourth technique measures the primary input-to-output delay. The experimental results show that the delay test is the most effective among all tests. The iDDT test with normalized RMS value of wavelet transform comes second. The other two tests were less effective than the first two, especially in the case of smaller technologies (22 and 16 nm).","PeriodicalId":167786,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of delay and IDDT tests in detecting resistive open defects for nanometer CMOS adder circuits\",\"authors\":\"L. Hamieh, N. Mehdi, Ghazalah Omeirat, A. Chehab, A. Kayssi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of different testing schemes in detecting resistive-open defects in adder circuits implemented using different CMOS technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm and 16 nm). We assess the detection capabilities of four testing techniques taking into consideration the wide process variations associated with the different nanometer technologies. The first three techniques are based on the transient supply current, iDDT, and the fourth technique is based on delay testing. The first iDDT method uses the RMS value of the wavelet transform of the transient power supply or ground currents. The second one uses the normalized RMS value of the wavelet transform. The third one uses the peak value of iDDT. The fourth technique measures the primary input-to-output delay. The experimental results show that the delay test is the most effective among all tests. The iDDT test with normalized RMS value of wavelet transform comes second. The other two tests were less effective than the first two, especially in the case of smaller technologies (22 and 16 nm).\",\"PeriodicalId\":167786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 6th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2011.6123101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了不同测试方案在检测使用不同CMOS技术(45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm和16 nm)实现的加法器电路中的阻性开放缺陷方面的有效性。我们评估了四种测试技术的检测能力,考虑到与不同纳米技术相关的广泛工艺变化。前三种技术是基于暂态电源电流,iDDT,第四种技术是基于延迟测试。第一种iDDT方法使用暂态电源或地电流的小波变换的均方根值。第二种方法使用小波变换的归一化均方根值。第三种是利用iDDT的峰值。第四种技术测量主要的输入到输出延迟。实验结果表明,延迟测试是所有测试中最有效的。其次是小波变换均方根值归一化的iDDT检测。另外两种测试的效果不如前两种,特别是在较小的技术(22纳米和16纳米)的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of delay and IDDT tests in detecting resistive open defects for nanometer CMOS adder circuits
In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of different testing schemes in detecting resistive-open defects in adder circuits implemented using different CMOS technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm and 16 nm). We assess the detection capabilities of four testing techniques taking into consideration the wide process variations associated with the different nanometer technologies. The first three techniques are based on the transient supply current, iDDT, and the fourth technique is based on delay testing. The first iDDT method uses the RMS value of the wavelet transform of the transient power supply or ground currents. The second one uses the normalized RMS value of the wavelet transform. The third one uses the peak value of iDDT. The fourth technique measures the primary input-to-output delay. The experimental results show that the delay test is the most effective among all tests. The iDDT test with normalized RMS value of wavelet transform comes second. The other two tests were less effective than the first two, especially in the case of smaller technologies (22 and 16 nm).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信