走向生态安全?

M. McDonald
{"title":"走向生态安全?","authors":"M. McDonald","doi":"10.1017/9781009024495.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change is increasingly identified as a first-order security issue. It has been debated in the United Nations Security Council, has found its way into states’ national security strategies and has been linked to large-scale conflict in Darfur and Syria. While policy practitioners and policy-oriented think tanks have clearly promoted this relationship between security and climate change, academic scholarship has also increasingly embraced the idea that climate change constitutes a threat to security. In a recent survey of scholars of international relations, albeit conducted prior to the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, climate change was three times more likely to be identified as the most pressing threat to global security than the next most significant threat (McDonald 2017; see also Harrington and Shearing 2017:18). Of course, only a small and ever-dwindling number of sceptics would deny that climate change is a significant problem. The increasing concentration of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere since the preindustrial era has driven an increase in the earth’s average temperatures, already at over 1 degree Celsius. While the scale of change and its effects have been different and experienced differently across the world, manifestations of this change include rising sea levels, changing rainfall patterns, desertification, an increase in vector-borne disease and an increase in the frequency and intensity of natural disasters, among other effects. These manifestations have, in turn, driven biodiversity loss, an increase in disease, economic privation, population displacement and the loss of arable land, again among many other implications. While these effects are clearly significant, business-asusual emissions scenarios pointing to a likely increase of 3–4 degrees by the end of the century would be truly catastrophic, rendering large parts of the currently populated earth uninhabitable and killing off a sizeable percentage of the earth’s living beings (Christoff ed. 2013; Burke 2019).","PeriodicalId":228289,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Security","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Ecological Security?\",\"authors\":\"M. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781009024495.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Climate change is increasingly identified as a first-order security issue. It has been debated in the United Nations Security Council, has found its way into states’ national security strategies and has been linked to large-scale conflict in Darfur and Syria. While policy practitioners and policy-oriented think tanks have clearly promoted this relationship between security and climate change, academic scholarship has also increasingly embraced the idea that climate change constitutes a threat to security. In a recent survey of scholars of international relations, albeit conducted prior to the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, climate change was three times more likely to be identified as the most pressing threat to global security than the next most significant threat (McDonald 2017; see also Harrington and Shearing 2017:18). Of course, only a small and ever-dwindling number of sceptics would deny that climate change is a significant problem. The increasing concentration of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere since the preindustrial era has driven an increase in the earth’s average temperatures, already at over 1 degree Celsius. While the scale of change and its effects have been different and experienced differently across the world, manifestations of this change include rising sea levels, changing rainfall patterns, desertification, an increase in vector-borne disease and an increase in the frequency and intensity of natural disasters, among other effects. These manifestations have, in turn, driven biodiversity loss, an increase in disease, economic privation, population displacement and the loss of arable land, again among many other implications. While these effects are clearly significant, business-asusual emissions scenarios pointing to a likely increase of 3–4 degrees by the end of the century would be truly catastrophic, rendering large parts of the currently populated earth uninhabitable and killing off a sizeable percentage of the earth’s living beings (Christoff ed. 2013; Burke 2019).\",\"PeriodicalId\":228289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Security\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024495.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024495.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化日益被视为首要安全问题。它在联合国安理会(United Nations Security Council)进行了辩论,已被纳入各国的国家安全战略,并与达尔富尔和叙利亚的大规模冲突联系在一起。虽然政策实践者和政策导向的智库已经明确提出了安全与气候变化之间的关系,但学术研究也越来越多地接受了气候变化对安全构成威胁的观点。在最近对国际关系学者进行的一项调查中,尽管是在冠状病毒大流行爆发之前进行的,但气候变化被视为全球安全最紧迫威胁的可能性是第二大威胁的三倍(McDonald 2017;另见Harrington and Shearing 2017:18)。当然,只有少数怀疑论者会否认气候变化是一个重大问题,而且人数在不断减少。自前工业化时代以来,大气中温室气体浓度的增加推动了地球平均气温的上升,目前地球平均气温已超过1摄氏度。虽然变化的规模及其影响各不相同,世界各地的经历也各不相同,但这种变化的表现形式包括海平面上升、降雨模式改变、荒漠化、媒介传播疾病增加以及自然灾害的频率和强度增加等影响。这些现象反过来又造成生物多样性丧失、疾病增加、经济贫困、人口流离失所和可耕地丧失,以及其他许多影响。虽然这些影响显然是显著的,但一切照常的排放情景表明,到本世纪末可能会增加3-4度,这将是真正的灾难性的,使目前人口众多的地球的大部分地区无法居住,并使地球上相当大比例的生物灭绝(Christoff主编,2013;伯克2019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Ecological Security?
Climate change is increasingly identified as a first-order security issue. It has been debated in the United Nations Security Council, has found its way into states’ national security strategies and has been linked to large-scale conflict in Darfur and Syria. While policy practitioners and policy-oriented think tanks have clearly promoted this relationship between security and climate change, academic scholarship has also increasingly embraced the idea that climate change constitutes a threat to security. In a recent survey of scholars of international relations, albeit conducted prior to the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, climate change was three times more likely to be identified as the most pressing threat to global security than the next most significant threat (McDonald 2017; see also Harrington and Shearing 2017:18). Of course, only a small and ever-dwindling number of sceptics would deny that climate change is a significant problem. The increasing concentration of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere since the preindustrial era has driven an increase in the earth’s average temperatures, already at over 1 degree Celsius. While the scale of change and its effects have been different and experienced differently across the world, manifestations of this change include rising sea levels, changing rainfall patterns, desertification, an increase in vector-borne disease and an increase in the frequency and intensity of natural disasters, among other effects. These manifestations have, in turn, driven biodiversity loss, an increase in disease, economic privation, population displacement and the loss of arable land, again among many other implications. While these effects are clearly significant, business-asusual emissions scenarios pointing to a likely increase of 3–4 degrees by the end of the century would be truly catastrophic, rendering large parts of the currently populated earth uninhabitable and killing off a sizeable percentage of the earth’s living beings (Christoff ed. 2013; Burke 2019).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信